MovieChat Forums > $ellebrity (2013) Discussion > 'Waaa, don't take my picture, waaaa!'

'Waaa, don't take my picture, waaaa!'


Buncha spoiled crazy idiots. I would kill to have problems like that. It's like some sort of crazy game. They want to be paid attention to, but if someone takes their photo in public they throw a fit like a four-year-old. Sickening. Homely past-it women like Aniston and J. Lo should be grateful for the paparazzi instead of bitching about it.

"Ass to ass. Ha ha ha ha. ASS TO ASS!"; http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oa5z77EI8y0

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

by One_BigHotMess

Actors don't sign up for not being able to leave there house with their children because some *beep* with a camera is gonna take a *beep* ton of pictures and if the actor tries to do anything about it there the ones who get sued! It's not just randomly taking a picture of someone.


Complete rubbish for 2 reasons,

1) If you don't want to be bothered by the Paparazzi then don't become a Celebrity, If you want your mansion in Hollywood, your top of the range Rolls Royce and millions in the bank? well then you have to put up with them, they must know about them before they start and if it bothered them so much they should have settled for a quieter life

If they didn't want to be photographed out with their children then they should have gotten an average 9-5 job, most 9-5 workers don't have the Paparazzi hanging outside their door, problem solved

2) Celebrities have no problem appearing on plenty of Talk-shows and Magazine Interviews and being photographed 12,000 times at a Movie Premier and collecting millions in paychecks when they have a new Movie out

They also have no problem with the Paparazzi when they are starting an acting career and need the exposure then when they reach a certain level of fame they suddenly start to hate it and then when it starts to slip they like it again


by One_BigHotMess
Do you really think Lindsey Lohan is the way he is because she simply keeps screwing up? ....ah no! Number one it's cause she was raise with *beep* up parents and two is because she was raised around the paparazzi and now they'll do anything to make her *beep* up so they'll have a news story! So then they'll make money cause stupid people find that interesting ...


More like she'll do anything to keep her name in the news, she doesn't have the ability to stay in the limelight for her acting so she gets her name in the news a different way.

BTW I don't actually like the Paparazzi myself, im just sick of all the whining Celebrities do about them


Last games completed: - Homefront (360), - Fallout 3 (PS3)

reply

You are completely brain-dead, Lindsay absolutely has the ability to stay in the limelight because of her acting, she's going quite well in her role on the West End play Speed The Plow, so no she won't do "anything" to keep her name in the news, sites like TMZ will just make crap up about her all the time because they know morons will eat it up like candy whether it's true or not.

Saying "don't become famous" is a lame excuse, what about celebrities kids? They certainly didn't ask for or give consent for people to get in their face and take pictures, what's your excuse for that dipsh*t?

There's a big goddamn difference between sanctioned photographs on red carpet premiers and unauthorized illegal photographs taken in someone's backyard.

Also there's different levels of fame, like Sheryl Crow said in the film, while she was famous people didn't really start aggressively pursuing her until her life took a downward turn with her break-up and cancer diagnosis.

Celebs should not have to get an average job just to get privacy, privacy is a RIGHT not a privilege like you seem to believe, and EVERYONE should have some expectation of privacy regardless of how rich they are.

reply

You are completely brain-dead, Lindsay absolutely has the ability to stay in the limelight because of her acting, she's going quite well in her role on the West End play Speed The Plow, so no she won't do "anything" to keep her name in the news, sites like TMZ will just make crap up about her all the time because they know morons will eat it up like candy whether it's true or not.

Saying "don't become famous" is a lame excuse, what about celebrities kids? They certainly didn't ask for or give consent for people to get in their face and take pictures, what's your excuse for that dipsh*t?

There's a big goddamn difference between sanctioned photographs on red carpet premiers and unauthorized illegal photographs taken in someone's backyard.

Also there's different levels of fame, like Sheryl Crow said in the film, while she was famous people didn't really start aggressively pursuing her until her life took a downward turn with her break-up and cancer diagnosis.

Celebs should not have to get an average job just to get privacy, privacy is a RIGHT not a privilege like you seem to believe, and EVERYONE should have some expectation of privacy regardless of how rich they are.

reply

Actors don't sign up for not being able to leave there house with their children because some *beep* with a camera is gonna take a *beep* ton of pictures and if the actor tries to do anything about it there the ones who get sued! It's not just randomly taking a picture of someone.


This, ^^^, is mostly a big crock of $#!+. Most celebrities know that this is now part of the game -- whether for good or for bad, having a "publicity machine" is what keeps them relevant and in the coin. They actually PAY people to make sure they're being talked about, to make sure they're seen or photographed about town, at restaurants, shopping, club hopping, hanging out, walking the dog, etc. Sometimes, they're even paid appearance or endorsement fees to do so. A celebrity is photographed walking down the street, holding a cup of coffee. Why do you suppose it's always Starbucks and not some other coffee brand? Probably because some kind of deal has been made -- otherwise you'd occasionally see them with a different brand, or they'd be photographed in a way that the Starbucks logo wasn't so prominently displayed.

There's a reason that certain celebrities get wall to wall coverage, while others (who may be even bigger stars) are rarely seen in the media -- it's because their communications team is hard at work determining how, when, where and why they'll get media coverage. Some want publicity any way they can get it, while others fiercely guard their image and grant media coverage only when they're promoting their work or special projects. Either way, it's usually left to their PR teams to manage the details because they know a great deal about how, when and what to exploit regarding their celebrity clients. They have the power and resources to influence what is reported about their clients. And mostly, whatever has been reported has been *planned, executed, and paid for.*

This is true despite the magnitude of the celebrity's status, or whether they're garnering good or bad publicity. Now, I will admit that many instances of bad publicity are a result of bad behavior on the part of the celebrity, but there have also been more than a few notable cases where bad behavior was staged in order to ignite a media storm.

Celebrities crying about the attention they receive simply because they're celebrities are disingenuous, to say the least. They, more than anyone, know the rules of the game.

Ha ha, made you look.

reply

[deleted]

^^^ Spot on, especially the PR team and how their clients have the choice to either become all "papz stalk" or become selective about public appearances (like those that make actual sense).

2012 Most Anticipated - Amour, Zero Dark Thirty

reply

Here is a documentary proving your point

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=flhRzo0_bjo

Starsuckers is a 2009 British documentary film aiming to expose the "shams and deceit involved in creating a pernicious celebrity culture".

Directed by Chris Atkins, director of the 2007 documentary Taking Liberties, it shows the production team planting a variety of celebrity-related stories in the UK media, such as a claim that the singer Avril Lavigne had been seen asleep in a nightclub. A variety of tabloid newspapers accepted the stories without corroboration or evidence.[1]

It launched as part of the British Film Institute's 53rd Film Festival. Thirty minutes of footage from the film were shown to the Leveson Inquiry as part of the evidence presented by the film's director, Chris Atkins.[2]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Starsuckers

reply

Your an idiot, the "rules of the game" do NOT excuse photographers putting lives in danger by chasing after celebs in their cars or harassing them when they're with kids.

reply

Why are you directing your bitching at the women? You know Marc Anothony, who is pretty darn homely/unattractive, and a couple other males were shown in the trailer to..

reply

Nobody would even care about Marc Anthony if he hadn't gotten hitched to J. Lo. LOL.

"Ass to ass. Ha ha ha ha. ASS TO ASS!"; http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oa5z77EI8y0

reply

Who said they want to be paid attention to 24/7? Every person who was ever in a movie automatically wants constant attention? Maybe they just like acting and would like a normal life otherwise.

I think it's pretty disgusting how the paparazzi acts... and then people just buy the sh*t up.

reply

Many of them really want the attention, these actors play the game too. Many of these celebrities call the paparazzi.

http://28.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_ljeiluo0Eb1qikdjao1_500.gif

reply

Not all of them do though, and like the film said, just because some people invite the attention doesn't automatically mean it's open season to go after all the other celebs who DON'T invite attention.

reply

You're a total *beep* you know that?

reply