Evidence on review
(I also just posted this on the board for the original series. Wasn't aware of this separate board at that time...)
I watched the first of the two new episodes last night, having just finished the original series just last week.
It was a little awkward for the filmmakers that most of the evidence now being challenged -- and which the defense is now characterizing as the most damning --had been almost completely ignored during the previous 8 episodes, which should add to claims of a pro-Peterson bias.
A little coincidence I noticed was that Rudolph's arguments for the retrial were cut short by an alarm triggered by a bomb threat. I recall that his last-minute technical preparations in the court room the night before the trial, 8 years before, were also interrupted by a fire alarm or something similar, weren't they?