Officially cancelled


ITV just confirmed:
http://renewcanceltv.com/broadchurch-officially-cancelled-no-season-4/

Probably just as well. The quality had fallen off after season 1.

The universe is not only stranger than we imagine, it is stranger than we can imagine.–J.B. Haldane

reply

That's pretty misleading, Chris Chibnall said from day one that he'd always planned Broadchurch as a trilogy, a single story told over three series. There was never any possibility of a fourth series because that is how the story was designed. It wasn't "cancelled" it's come to what was always planned as the end. ITV would love to do more, I'm sure.

reply

Well, based on popularity, such series are sometimes extended to take advantage of that popularity. That way they can keep going until they seem to run out of steam. E.g., Fargo.

The universe is not only stranger than we imagine, it is stranger than we can imagine.–J.B. Haldane

reply

Well, based on popularity, such series are sometimes extended to take advantage of that popularity. That way they can keep going until they seem to run out of steam. E.g., Fargo.

But that was never a possibility with Broadchurch. It's one single story, not a continuing drama serial.

reply

I'm just saying that they can always continue a series if it's popular enough by having more cases/adventures for the existing characters, or having a related spin-off (e.g., Breaking Bad -> Better Call Saul). Creatively that's certainly doable. But the producers apparently didn't want to extend it, probably because it was no longer as popular as it had been at first, or they were just getting tired of it and wanted to move on to other projects.

The universe is not only stranger than we imagine, it is stranger than we can imagine.–J.B. Haldane

reply

That is simply not true. The creator/showrunner/sole writer (who I've known for years) worked on the idea for Broadchurch for a decade before it got on air, and always, always intended it to be a single three-part story. When he first pitched it to ITV he was upfront about saying "but this can only run for three series maximum."

Creatively that's certainly doable.

Hypothetically yes, if you're a money-grabber who's willing to compromise your creative integrity and throw an idea you've planned for a decade out of the window.

But the producers apparently didn't want to extend it, probably because it was no longer as popular as it had been at first, or they were just getting tired of it and wanted to move on to other projects.

Utter nonsense. The "producers" didn't make the decision and the decision certainly wasn't made based on declining popularity or desire to move on. It was 100% Chris' sole decision, it was a creative decision, and one he made years ago and stuck to.

reply

The series did suffer a gradual ratings decline. But if it was never intended to run beyond three seasons, then maybe you should contact the editor and get them to issue an update/retraction. Maybe they would.

The universe is not only stranger than we imagine, it is stranger than we can imagine.–J.B. Haldane

reply

What "editor"? You mean the person who runs the site you linked to?
I did leave a comment on their site, but I'm not especially invested in what some random fansite says.

Literally nothing in the statement they've quoted says that Broadchurch was cancelled, only that series 3 will be the final chapter, which is what everyone involved with the show has been saying since day one.

reply

Hypothetically yes, if you're a money-grabber who's willing to compromise your creative integrity and throw an idea you've planned for a decade out of the window.

pt100 is right. It has nothing to with compromising one's creative integrity or throwing an idea you've planned for a decade out of the window. That's a cop-out. It has to do with not bothering to leverage the creativity of the series into another realm (most likely new plots/series for at least some of the same characters, as happened with the transition from Breaking Bad to Better Call Saul) that will allow additional creativity to flourish.

The fact is that there was a significant ratings decline for Broadchurch after the airing of the first episode of the second season. The premiere episode of series two drew an average of 7.3 million viewers. Ratings dropped significantly afterward. Viewership for the second episode fell to just 6.11 million viewers after accounting for ITV+1 viewership. That was the lowest overnight viewership rating for the series since episode five of series one.

Overnight ratings dropped again for the third episode to just 5.2 million viewers, the lowest for any episode of the series. Overnight viewership dropped again for episode four.

There was an excellent review at the Huffington Post, excerpted below:

"Given how wonderful its first season was, the fact that “Broadchurch” has turned into such a muddle is the bigger disappointment. Despite the usual array of finely calibrated performances, the second season simply doesn’t work, in large part because it consciously and deliberately undoes much of what was powerful about the shattering conclusion to the first season. Four episodes into Season 2, it was hard not to arrive at the conclusion that “Broadchurch” — which was badly translated for the American market with the clunky “Gracepoint” — should have quit while it was ahead and stopped after Season 1."

The full review may be found here:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/03/04/broadchurch-season-2_n_6801732.html

Series three will be the last, not because it was "always planned that way," but because it will probably be limping over the finish line. Leveraging new creative properties off of a highly successful series is not crass commercialism; it's good, smart, entertainment-business strategy. And it can be done with either some of the existing acting, writing and production staff or a new set of players.

There are many examples of how well this can work out. And when people don't take advantage of a show's popularity, it's usually because either the ratings were sagging, or they got tired, or they lost their nerve and didn't want to risk failure, or the staff dispersed onto other projects before management could act.

Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. - Arthur C. Clarke

reply

Well, I think I know more about it having worked closely with Chris and discussed it with him, than Americans making assumptions about British TV. But I'm not interested in arguing with people because I'm obviously not going to change your mind. If you don't believe Chris there's no reason you'd believe me.

reply

To be fair Chris made a true masterpiece with Season 1 but the courtroom drama of Season 2 didn't work for almost anyone

Do you know if he's going back to that fantastic character driven writing for Season 3?

reply

Guys, Broadchurch season 1 is a work of art

I agree that season 2 isn't as good, but it's still quite good in its own right

It only falls when you compare it to season 1

You can't compare the way American TV shows get spin offs to a European show

God knows I think Breaking Bad is the greatest thing that ever happened to storytelling and I'm a Better Call Saul addict

But they're different beasts

In the US there is a much better understanding of how to make art and product work together

Breaking Bad and Better Call Saul are the best example in TV

In Europe we just don't have that

We have a work of art like Broadchurch, and the made-for-money dumb product like Emerdale

You can't expect a European TV show that's serious like Broadchurch to be worked out in spin off, new adventures for the same characters and all that craziness that was mentioned in these posts

They're different beasts, different cultures and different creative processes

OK?

reply

Some of us appreciate the information, thank you!

reply

...Chris Chibnall said from day one that he'd always planned Broadchurch as a trilogy, a single story told over three series. There was never any possibility of a fourth series because that is how the story was designed. It wasn't "cancelled" it's come to what was always planned as the end.
In addition, the BBC announced in January that Chibnall would succeed Steven Moffat as the showrunner of Doctor Who. I should think that the transition was in fact agreed upon well before the announcement.

http://www.radiotimes.com/news/2016-01-22/doctor-who-showrunner-steven-moffat-quits-to-be-replaced-by-broadchurch-creator-chris-chibnall

http://variety.com/2016/tv/news/doctor-who-steven-moffat-quits-leaving-season-10-1201686557/

http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/doctorwho/entries/55e94ef2-0282-494f-a62c-82bd514f02fe

Whatever ITV's desires might be, Broadchurch was never intended to be a long running "cash cow". I dismiss the article cited by the OP as poorly researched or at best, deliberate clickbait. (No reflection on you of course, pt100.)

reply