Another landmark disgraced


Adding a famous landmark just to try and get more viewers is just another idea to add to the long list of pathetic cringe worthy awful ones that the SYFY channel producers come up with just because they can. I would love to know who is backing this crap. I mean where are they getting the 50 grand or whatever it takes to do crappy CGI and pay Erik Estrada the 4 or 5 Grand he probably gets for 2 weeks worth of phone in non acting. As well as the other unknown B-rate actors who get at least the SAG minimum of 1500 or so a week.I'm betting this movie took a month to film at most and another month to edit and toss it to SYFY.

*beep* , I need to go to one of those film learning institutes where you can get a cert in a year or so and be able to get idiots to throw money at me to direct and act in this crap. *beep* the SAG min is like about 1500 a week for a speaking role. That's more than I make right now and probably get directing pay too.







So, a thought crossed your mind? Must have been a long and lonely journey

reply

Adding a famous landmark...
Are you talking about Estrada's dental work and hair dye job? Without those there's hardly any movie there, unless you squint.


_____________________
Log Lady lives

reply