MovieChat Forums > 2016: Obama's America (2012) Discussion > I am so sick of this administration

I am so sick of this administration

posted 10 years ago by herbsuperb
14 replies | jump to latest

http://www.cnn.com/2014/09/11/world/meast/kerry-mideast-visit-isis/ind ex.html?hpt=hp_t2

This man is beyond ridiculous. This whole government is beyond ridiculous. Let's see. We're sending special forces to shoot them, or tell others how to shoot them. We've got spy planes trying to spot them so that armed aircraft can drop bombs on them and shoot missiles at them. SOUNDS LIKE A ****ING WAR TO ME JOHN KERRY! Why is this government such a bunch of ****ing ****ies?

"Significant counter-terrorism operation"!!!

How is that any different, or better than "WAR!!!", which is what this is? What is John Kerry so afraid of that he can't just call **** exactly what it is? What is Obama so afraid of? Why can these ****ing jokers not call things what they are. This is "overseas contingency operation" all over again. These people are ****ing clowns.

America. Please elect somebody with some ****ing ****s next time. I'm so sick of this pantywaist bull****. The guys who cut James Foley and Steven Sotloff's heads off are laughing their barbarian ***es off tonight listening to this ****. They'll draw strength and confidence knowing that they are up against imbeciles who are afraid of their own shadows. This is NOT how you defeat an enemy. You don't combat savage barbarism by conveying weakness and indecision. You win it with decisive, consistent, and palpable words, combined with strong and decisive action to back it up. This is exactly the kind of mentality that ensures that wars last a decade or more these days, and they never end in a decisive victory for either side. Perpetual mediocrity will rule the day. Thanks Obama.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2014/09/12/dont-call-it-war-administra tion-hit-for-refusing-to-use-w-word-for-isis-mission/

Guess he's trying to justify his ridiculous Nobel Peace Prize, while making the US out to be weaklings and cowards in the eyes of those who would slaughter every last one of us if they could. Way to go!

[–] AckbartheHutt 10 years ago

I hope George finds those WMD's on his next vacation.

At the World Trade Center site in Lower Manhattan, 2,753 people are killed when hijacked American Airlines Flight 11 and United Airlines Flight 175 are intentionally crashed in the north and south towers.
Of those who perish during the initial attacks and the subsequent collapses of the towers, 343 are New York City firefighters, another 23 are New York City police officers and 37 others are officers at the Port Authority.
The victims range in age from two to 85 years. Approximately 75-80 percent of the victims are men.
At the Pentagon in Washington, 184 people are killed when hijacked American Airlines Flight 77 crashes into the building.
Near Shanksville, Pennsylvania, 40 passengers and crew members aboard United Airlines Flight 93 die when the plane crashes into a field. It is believed that the hijackers crashed the plane in that location, rather than their unknown target, after the passengers and crew attempted to retake control of the flight deck.

[–] herbsuperb 10 years ago

ISIS already got them, and gassed some innocent Kurds with them.

http://www.foxnews.com/world/2014/10/13/gruesome-photos-may-show-isis- using-chemical-weapons-on-kurds-says-report/

But don't worry, it's not a war. It's a 'significant biochemilogical event'. Obama stopped all the terrorists by being really, really nice to them and apologizing for all the evils of America. Remember?

[–] herbsuperb 10 years ago

Why do liberals and Obama drones insist on beating this 'THERE WERE NO WMD'S IN IRAQ AND BUSH LIED AND IS A WAR CRIMINAL' drum?

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2014/10/15/us-troops-wounded-by-decade s-old-chemical-weapons-during-iraq-war-report-claims/

Obviously there were chem weapons there. Saddam had used them before, and was simply good at hiding what was left of them and keeping them from weapons inspectors/US soldiers. Now because of pacifists in congress, insane religious nutballs have their hands on dangerous chemical agents. Great. Thanks Obama. Good job.

[–] AckbartheHutt 10 years ago

US Defence Secretary Donald Rumsfeld helped Saddam Hussein build up his arsenal of deadly chemical and biological weapons, it was revealed last night.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-153210/Rumsfeld-helped-Iraq-ch emical-weapons.html

http://pilgrimakimbo.files.wordpress.com/2007/01/rummy-and-sadam.jpg

Fox News is obsessed with Benghazi. That's not secret. But here's a fact buried in Politico Magazine national editor Michael Hirsh's article discussing the "Benghazi-Industrial Complex": the word Benghazi has been mentioned on no fewer than 1,101 Fox News programs in the past year.

[–] herbsuperb 10 years ago

US Defence Secretary Donald Rumsfeld helped Saddam Hussein build up his arsenal of deadly chemical and biological weapons, it was revealed last night

"Revealed last night..."?

That's no secret. The US picked a horse in that race. At that time the right one. It was important to deter Iranian aggression. Revolutions tend to get ugly. If the Iranians had seized Iraqi/Kuwaiti oil they could have locked the worlds supply up and used it in any number of wretched ways. Propping up one group of savages against the other is an age old method for maintaining peace. Sadly it does mean getting into bed with a lot of savages. At the time it made sense. Your hindsight means nothing.

Fox News is obsessed with Benghazi.

Everybody SHOULD be interested in what happened there. The US administrations response to that outrageous assault was beyond appalling. Yet to this day nobody that had control over that situation has owned up to it, and are actively impeding any efforts to discover the truth. And no, just because republican administrations have done the same thing (and they have), DOES NOT MAKE IT OKAY!!!!

That bull**** that Susan Rice spewed to the nation after that happened was absolutely beyond lunacy. Lying little *****. Whoever gave her those orders should never serve in a public capacity again. It was disgusting.

When a terrorist murders an American Ambassador in an American Embassy, there must be a reckoning. The Obama administration has done everything it can to avoid one, because it would out the fact that they bumbled the whole thing, and four good men are dead because of it.

[–] AckbartheHutt 10 years ago

Prior to Benghazi, were there 13 attacks on embassies and 60 deaths under President George W. Bush?

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2014/may/12/john-ga ramendi/prior-benghazi-were-there-13-attacks-embassies-and/

I am confused here, I thought you hated Obama but yet you are ok with Republicans supplying mustard gas to Iraq? How many Iranians died because of this just action? You do realize that both parties are evil and shouldn't be trusted.

[–] herbsuperb 10 years ago

Prior to Benghazi, were there 13 attacks on embassies and 60 deaths under President George W. Bush?

No ****. You say that like it's news. Tell me something though. Did George Bush EVER try (repeatedly, and with great vigor) to blame it on anybody other than who it was, in order to alleviate himself of responsiblity for it. He was fighting a war. The scum we fight are low enough to attack embassies and diplomats. Scum of the earth that they are.

I thought you hated Obama

Nope. Just think he is really bad president.

you are ok with Republicans supplying mustard gas to Iraq?

At the time I probably would have been. Nations in the wake of revolution can be dangerous. Maintaining a balance of power in such an economically fragile, and vital, part of the world is important. Iran was threatening the oil supply through the Strait of Hormuz, and that cannot be tolerated. Saddam offered a counterbalance. He turned out to be a monster, no argument there. But your perfect hindsight was unavailable at the time.

How many Iranians died because of this just action?

Don't really care. Nothing to do with me, or you.

You do realize that both parties are evil and shouldn't be trusted.

Yep. Drag them into the streets and shoot them. Good riddance.

[–] 10 years ago

[deleted]

[–] herbsuperb 10 years ago

I'd love to see moderates and sane people from both parties abandon the republicans and democrats to form a centrist party with some real clout. Sadly the quality of the American people has declined so greatly that no honest and decent person can be elected president. The political atmosphere is so polarized that only candidates that pander to their base have any chance of winning, and far too many people prefer now to rely on others rather than themselves for their livelihood, so they elect those that will placate them in exchange for their vote. Revolution is coming, and it will be ugly. Too soon the dregs will be able to outvote the producers in this country, and the producers will say 'NO MORE!!!'. Desperation will take hold, and bloodshed will ensue.

America is a nation in decline due to decades, perhaps generations of decadence. We live too well to be able to take care of ourselves when things get really bad. When the world loses faith in the US dollar, our economy will see a sharp decline, and those that cannot fend for themselves, will begin to eat each other.

Buy guns, learn to use them, and keep them close. When democracy no longer functions, a (probably liberal) government will try to assert control by seizing privately held firearms so they can seize monetary assets to placate the dreggish hoards that put them in power more easily. Then it is war.

I sincerely hope my apocalyptic pessimism is unfounded. But my faith in the American political system is shaken far more often than it is reaffirmed.

[–] FirstBlood1982 9 years ago

The problem with a "centrist" president is that essentially says you want candidates that are both trying to move to the center, hence they're as much alike as possible...if that's going to be our president, why bother an election at all?

A 'centrist party' would just be throwing a third member into that idea.

A genuine conservative that isn't registered with either party would be great, I'd love a viable candidate outside of the two party system.
What the republican party is meant to stand for and what most of its candidates claim to stand for is generally good and pro-american, the problem with the party is that it puts candidates in there that don't truly represent the values and are just typical political puppets.

With the democratic party, it's so disgustingly corrupt and has such a dangerously ignorant base that blatant anti-americanism can be flaunted in their faces and they'll keep cheering it on anyway. Not only are the politicians the problem, the base is. Obama is the ultimate symbol of that.

+++by His wounds we are healed. - Isaiah 53:5+++

[–] AckbartheHutt 9 years ago

Just weeks before 9/11, while spending a holiday at his ranch in Crawford, Texas, Mr Bush received a memo from the CIA entitled, "Bin Laden Determined To Strike in US". While the President cannot respond to every single threat presented to the country, the timing and nature of this particular warning will forever blight his legacy.

[–] herbsuperb 9 years ago

the timing and nature of this particular warning will forever blight his legacy.

Probably. And that is unfortunate. Do you believe that if a political leadership figure, like Mr. Bush knows, and takes seriously advice brought to him by those who should know that says 'Bin Laden Determined To Strike in US' he should be able to use that advice to stop every possible in-progress terrorist attack?

If you believe that, you are not well.

There is a world of difference between having strong suspicions, or even proof, that a terrorist organization wants to kill you, and know exactly where, when, and in what manner that attack will materialize.

People see this quote, and combine that with the fact that the 9/11 attacks did in fact happen, and then from that basis, claim the president was negligent, and perhaps 'allowed' it to happen unopposed.

That is among the most ridiculous bull**** leaps in logic I've ever seen the left come up with, and they come up with such garbage all the time.

[–] AckbartheHutt 9 years ago

Nine eleven was a coup against the constitution. Additional reports released this week make clear some of the reasons Bush lied to the American people, to congress, our military and our allies, “Obama’s Director for National Intelligence, James Clapper, has declassified new documents that reveal how the NSA was first given the green light to start collecting bulk communication data in the hunt for Al-Qaeda terrorists after 9/11. President Barack Obama’s administration has for the first time publicly confirmed ‘the existence of collection activities authorized by President George W. Bush,’ such as bulk amounts of Internet and phone metadata, as part of the ‘Terrorist Surveillance Program’ (TSP). The disclosures are part of Washington's campaign to justify the NSA’s surveillance activities, following massive leaks to the media about the classified programs by former NSA contractor Edward Snowden. Clapper explained on Saturday that President George W. Bush first authorized the spying in October 2001, just weeks after the September 11 attacks.”

We can prove Bush was fully criminally culpable in covering the tracks of those responsible for 9/11.

[–] Bubbathegut (17220) 7 years ago

thank u for your patriotism