Didn't Claire Wyden already have three vials of the antidote in her bag before Kate slipped in that extra one prior to George getting on his Chewit advert face on with her?
He'd be poisoned and couldn't do what he later does in the movie!!
Completely pulled me out of a very believable situation that did. Ruined an otherwise highbrow cinematic masterpiece.
WHY???!?!
I kinda get what you're saying, but I kinda don't. Why would he be poisoned? I thought we're talking about antidotes? I thought what you're trying to point out is that Claire already had some antidotes in her possession because she had forced Kate to hand them over. So the ending where Kate and the Rock conceived some spur of the moment plan to slip one in Claire's purse was unnecessary. All they needed to do was make George eat Claire, that dramatic moment of slipping in the antidote didn't make sense since Claire already had some on her. Is that what you're saying?
Unless I missed the part where they explained George needed a certain number of vials? Therefore slipping in the last one was necessary? Or maybe they feared Claire destroyed them?
Were any of the vials ever even used? I didn't get the point of any of that.
shareSeriously? In a movie about a giant gorilla, alligator, and flying wolf wreaking havoc on downtown Chicago THAT'S what ruins your "sense of realism"?
..Joe
[deleted]
[deleted]
I agree. I wanted to use this documentary for my college thesis on human/animal relations in city environments. But if they can't get geographical locations correct how can I trust the rest of the research they preformed????😥😥
share[deleted]