MovieChat Forums > Golden Boy (2013) Discussion > Is Theo/Walter the reason this show got ...

Is Theo/Walter the reason this show got cancelled


I have watched this show religiously from the beginning and have come to the personal realization that the weakest actor/character is Theo/Walter which of course is a problem if that actor/character is supposed to be the lead. In my humble opinion, they took a pretty boy and tried to make him into some sort of tough New Yorker. I was getting tired of the angry stares that were supposed to pass for being tough. It just wasn't working that well for me.

Don't kill the show, kill off Clark and let Chi McBride take over as the lead/star. Now that would be a show to watch. All the other actors were outstanding and brought real feelings to the show.



"To know who rules you, find who you are not allowed to criticize." Voltaire

reply

It's being canceled because CBS isn't giving it a fair shake. Started this awesome show in February when everyone's habits are already formed. If they had started this show in September in Vegas' slot it would have been a huge hit. Giving it a second season CBS would have realized that. They are punishing the show when CBS didn't give it a fair fighting chance. Sign the petition to bring it back:

http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/save-golden-boy

reply

I agree. I loved the show and I was really mad that it was canceled having only shown such a few episodes. I don't often get into a show immediately. But, I did with this one. CBS is notorious for cutting a good show before it has time to attract a significant audience.

reply

I think Theo James is a solid actor who fits in great with the rest of the cast. Besides the "youngest police com in history" twist, there really isn't any new ground this show is trying to cover. It's stale. In my opinion, the problem isn't with any of them main actors, but the cliche writing & cliche story lines that have been done to death -and in a better way I might add- on other crime procedural dramas. I just think people are just tired of seeing the same thing over and over, and the ratings reflect that.
But I will miss seeing Theo's gorgeous face every Tuesday night, I'll give you that.

reply

I think the name hurt it. I think he was too pretty for the part, but really viewers just didn't connect with it. It started out with okay ratings, but fell over time. I think the biggest turn off for viewers was probably the constant fighting between his character and Arroyo. People go to work for that kind of tension, they don't want to see it in their crime dramas (divisive homicide units just don't work on TV, the victims are the most important thing there). ;)

The show was always at its best when Arroyo and Clark weren't fighting or undermining each other.

http://chriscolleytvblog.blogspot.com

reply

I agree. I really didn't like that story line

"To know who rules you, find who you are not allowed to criticize." Voltaire

reply

The main problem with the OP's idea is that it would require a complete restructuring of the show, mainly the premise and title. It would invalidate all of the prior "7 years from now" scenes. You could possibly do that and pick up some Walking Dead viewers by calling it Golden Zombie Boy. The tagline could also be changed:
In 7 years, Walter Clark will become the first zombie Police Commissioner. This is his story...



Raylan Givens: You make me pull, and I'll put you down.

reply

That is a show I would definitely watch. Zombie Police Commissioner. Wait, it could be a lead in on how The Walking Dead starts. Zombie Police Squad, Zombie SWAT. They try to take some guy down but he just keeps putting plants in their way.

Quod scripsi, scripsi.
Exsorbeo pubes.

reply

You mean The Walking Dead Golden Boy (Golden Boy in tiny letters).

http://chriscolleytvblog.blogspot.com

reply

Pshh you're view is clearly biased and one sided---Theo was the weakest of the cast because he was a pretty boy? It's not exactly like he can help his looks. His acting was up to par right up there with Chi McBride, even Chi McBride showered him with high compliments. I think it's in poor taste for people like you to sit and complain about actors for being "too pretty" to play roles like cops--you know not every cop out in this world is rugged and hard looking? There are actually some young, attractive and ambitious cops. Regardless of looks, I think the storyline is what kept us attracted to the show, but it was the timing of the showing in which it aired and the nights it aired that killed it. I didn't even know the show was on CBS until after the finale. It had nothing to do with anyone's looks or acting chops but had everything to do with CBS making a dumb move in replacing a show with such an ambitious show as Golden Boy-mid season.

reply

"clearly biased and one sided".... you make that sound like a bad thing. Thats what an opinion is. and I didn't say he was weakest "because" he was a pretty boy. Read it again. I said he was a light weight actor that got hired cause of his looks. there's a difference. and i don't give a Pshh about what real cops look like. I want my entertainment cops to look the part. and its not in poor taste to sit and complain.

having said all that, you may be right about the reasons for canceling the show. you seem to know more about that kind of stuff than i do.

"To know who rules you, find who you are not allowed to criticize." Voltaire

reply

You're probably right, Theo's acting isn't that great, his character isn't that believable or likeable.

That he is pretty is exactly right imho, for the story to work he has to have it all, pretty looks, clever, good partner that boosts him, courage and above all "luck" to become the police commissioner.
Good looking and pretty guys have a distinctive advantage over normal people, it's true not just for women but for men too. You just want them to be successful because they have good genes and it's advantageous for the "larger tribe" for them to be. That's why we like them.

reply

No, this show was cancelled because it didn't really fit CBS's core demographics. I'd always thought it was too "urban" (grittier crimes, a very ethnic cast, script was racially aware, very much of the city--reminded me of a glossier version of "NY Undercover") when compared to other CBS dramas, and it wasn't a procedural.

reply

It's pretty amazing that CBS's core demographics are so screwed up. They practically made the gritty crime drama a thing back in the late 60s-early 70s. But, I guess all the fans of those shows at the time they aired are probably dead.

http://chriscolleytvblog.blogspot.com

reply