Captain Phillips


How would you compare this to the movie by Paul Greengrass?

reply

Based on each movie's trailer, it should make an interesting comparison. Hard to believe the Dane's didn't prep/train for pirates. They were Vikings, at one time.

The take away seems to be, hope for best, prep for worst, keep a Seal Team on retainer.

reply

The pirates were Somalian who are known for not looking like Vikings.



reply

He meant the Danes were vikings at one time.

reply

This was during the early days of the attacks and imo a much better film than Capt Phillips which was exaggerated as usual by Hollywood.


Vikings sigh...They got their arse's kicked by the then tiny Romans (most of whom were 5-5'6 feet tall)and no I am not a size crazy yank but a fellow decedent of the barbarians myself LOL I was born and raised in Germany. But my point is size really does NOT matter in a fight or battle the Romans, Red Chinese and Koreans and the Vietnamese proved that. And in 1994 so did the Somalis where Rangers,Delta Forces and Seals were dealt a serious blow I know due to political reasons but still as in Iraq and Afghanistan even the most highly skilled can be killed by a lesser enemy. I minored in Historical warfare..

I have or had relatives both on my US and German sides of the family who are in the military and both sides served in the sandbox as they called it. Ask a Seal or any real SF's or ordinary combat soldier they well tell you never to never underestimate any enemy.

The real world is very different than these movies Navy Seals, SAS, KSK or whatever are NOT indestructible...Lastly I have a cousin who lost 2 legs to a IED in Afghanistan back in 2011 he's a US Marine so that war was very close to home for my whole family.

Dr.Nichole A. MD. AKA Nicky was here.

I never revisit posts. Too busy and mature to argue.

reply

Most of the best Danish Vikings went to England, which is why half of England was once a Danish colony, and one reason why Britain now wins most of the sailing competitions.

reply

I'm surprised more people haven't discussed this. Obviously I haven't seen Captain Phillips yet, but I'm expecting it to be significantly more "Hollywood-ized".

Just based on the trailer there's a lot more "action" - did you see the lifeboat plunge into the water towards the end of the trailer??

I loved how the majority of this film focused on the negotiation tactics at the shipping company and then life on the boat. I have a feeling the Greengrass film will have significantly less focus on the negotiation and instead focus more on Tom Hanks and his crew.

The two certainly seem related, I wonder if Tobias Lindholm got any credit from Sony? It appears the Captain Phillips film is based on a US ship though, so it's doubtful he deserves any.

reply

Well, now that Captain Phillips is released, your theory is wrong. A significant portion of Captain Phillips does focus on the negotiation.

reply

It does, but is definitely Hollywood style negotiations, while this felt more grounded due in part to the cinema vérité style camerawork, grounded performances, and realistic dialogue. It is hard to say which is better as a hijacking movie since Captain Phillips is a tale of one man's survival with some focus on the negotiations, while A Hijacking is the opposite. I will give the slight nod to A Hijacking though, how about you?

2014 Rankings: imdb.com/list/mOL23rGRrh
2014/2013 Oscar Predictions: imdb.com/list/zPd-s4IUZMs/

reply

I just saw Captain Phillips and Kapringen back to back. I really enjoyed Captain Phillips and think it was a far superior movie. There wasn't as much tension in this movie as there was in Captain Phillips.

reply

Oh no. I didn't like Captain Phillips that much and the trailer for this seemed more exciting.

reply

I saw Kapringen a couple months ago. I did enjoy it. The negotiations scene with the CEO of the shipping line were good. As were some of the interactions between the crew and the pirates. I liked 'the negotiator' especially.

I loved Captain Phillips. Kept me on the edge of my seat. The actors playing the pirates were frighteningly convincing. Tom Hanks is one of my favorite actors to watch, and he turned in a solid performance. My only real complaint was the shaky cam which I REALLY could have done without. But I got used to it after about 20 minutes, and don't feel I missed much on account of it.

All that being said. They are simply too different to really compare. I liked Captain Phillips more I guess, but Kapringen was excellent too, in different ways. The negotiations aspect wasn't dealt with much in CP, because in reality it wasn't really done much. Not about money anyways. I liked the actions sequences around the boarding, which was skipped in Kapringen, probably because it would have cost too much and they didn't want it to be the focal point of the film.

They both had strengths, and anybody who liked one, should see the other.

Note to Paul Greengrass......BUY SOME ****ING STEADY CAMS AND LEARN HOW TO USE THEM!!!

reply

[deleted]

I too have watched both. Captain Phillips based on the actual events of the Maersk Alabama made was a sure-fire thriller, especially for those who knew/know very little on the subject.

Kapringen (A Hijacking) being fictional inspired by the whole Somaili Piracy thing could have easily been more thrilling.

If we're to assume that it's set in the same universe but in 2012 and not 2009, then surely some talk of military involvement could have made mention on the successful rescue of the crew of the Maersk Alabama and that there was no ransom paid.

Alternatively, if it is set in it's own world, just have the military talk, and the foregone conclusion that doing a military style operation would just have all hostages killed, so the ship is "quarantined" and some sort of exclusion zone for any ships is set up (which I'm sure was done in the movie anyways).

The Danish Royal family should offer their prayers and support for the hostages, whilst the Prime Minister acknowledges that military intervention is not possible and that any ransom money paid is up to the shipping company.

Omar the interpreter should also double as the leader of the pirates, only revealing himself in the end as being both. As for the Captain, his death in the end was not necessary (although somewhat surprising and shocking). It would have been more shocking if he was killed somewhere in the middle. Perhaps when the cook is supposedly shot. A great idea would have been Omar agreeing with Peter's assertion that he can offer at most 5 million, where Omar executes the Captain (in the same room as the cook, where it was a choice between one or the other). That's where the press goes crazy and the board threatens to remove Peter as negotiator and bring in the expert (which they now truly believe they should have done with in the beginning.

The film ends not with Peter driving his flashy Mercedes outside of the company garage (well in relief at least, where in the original the Captain dies by accident at the end in disgrace, having been fired by the board for mishandling the negotiation (he sees the negotiations to the end) and with regards to the Captain's death.

You kill one of the most valuable hostages, therefore the value of the ransom goes down and it actually makes the bosses of the shipping company get things rolling.

In essence, being totally fictional, set in a real world there could have easily have been more shocks and tension, there was some here and there in the final film, but there could have been more.

reply

Lord David, A HIJACKING was not "totally fictional." It's based on a true story of the same Danish ship named in the movie being held for ransom by pirates a few years ago. The ship's controller, Juma, had a cameo appearance in the movie and was interviewed in the DVD bonus scenes.

reply

Not really based on a true story... though the ship in the movie is an actual ship that was hijacked.

That said, the story has strong resemblance to the hijacking of Danica White in 2007.

reply

Captain Phillips never really addresses the "company" side of the situation. The negotiations are done with the US government, not the shipping exec board.


Captain Phillips has more gripping pacing but Hijacking grows on you if you can get past the first 20 minutes of slowness. I thought the film was just going to be a cheap ripoff of Phillips but that is no longer my opinion after watching the film.


Both films, in my opinion, have good to excellent acting.

reply

I'm glad you reconsidered your previous opinion that A Hijacking was a 'cheap ripoff' of Captain Philips - since A Hijacking was released a year before Captain Philips. 

reply

i liked kapringen slightly more, because it seemed more realistic and not just an over-dramatized hollywood production "based on a true story".

so if you're looking for a more action laden hollywood-drama, captain phillips will probably better fit your needs, but as a movie that's slightly less than what you've already seen a hundred times and slightly more interesting as a consequence, kapringen wins out for me, albeit only by a small margin.

reply