MovieChat Forums > The Timber (2015) Discussion > Convoluted, confusing, hard to follow, u...

Convoluted, confusing, hard to follow, unnecessarily mysterious


I found THE TIMBER unnecessarily convoluted, confusing, and difficult to follow. The screenwriter and the director tried to spin a mysterious, Old West yarn that bordered on the horror genre but ended up spinning out of control into the incomprehensible. That's a shame because the movie could have been better. I loved the wintry country and mountain scenes, which must have accurately depicted the American Mountain states in the winters of the 1870s and the 1880s. Historical records show that the winters of that time period were especially harsh-artic frigid, whiteout blizzards, immense deep snowdrifts, and incredible suffering by man and beast-compared to the milder winters of the 21st century that produce minimal snow and less harsh sub-zero temperatures so that the beautiful wintry countryside scenes don't appear any more. But all that was wasted on a movie that tried to too hard to be artsy and mysterious but ended up a pretentious muddle.

reply

I agree.

I wish Redbox had a rating lower than 1.

Renting this movie for $1.62 was $1.61 cents too much.

What a waste of time.
I fast forwarded thru most of it.

There WERE some beautiful scenic compositions - but I coulda watched a National Geographic program if I wanted to see only that.

What was the DEAL with the crazy guy in the cave?


Why did the father act like a Shakesperian actor when he had the son tied up . . .?


What was the DEAL with the two brothers not having an extra wagon wheel, losing horses so easy and having no guns?


What was the DEAL with the weird flashbacks or dreamsWyatt kept having?

What was the DEAL with the colonel and the guy he went to see who had the fake gold? That whole line of insanity went no where.


Also, the colonel looked ridiculous wearing a bowler with such short hair and a just a short blazer in freezing weather & snow.

Who has EVER seen torches mounted around a campfire in any western?
Especially when you're on foot and only have 1 horse toting your few precious, valuable supplies?


So disjointed non-sensical.

The most interesting thing in the movie was the funky fork & knife 'art' hanging on a tee-pee.


And btw, what year was this supposed to be? Because oil meant little to people before trains, etc . .


reply

I'm afraid have to agree with all comments here.
Unnecessarily convoluted indeed!
Beautiful cinematography.
Read a criticism of the editing. Maybe that is what is wrong.
Maybe I'm just stupid & don't "get it"!
😕

reply

Nope.
You're not stupid.

It was, indeed a messed up movie ...

;)

reply