Bloody awful!..


With the notable exception of Jack Farthing (the Hon. Freddie Threepwood), this has been so monumentally miscast, that I seriously doubt anybody involved in this production has ever read the original books. Spall, Saunders, Richards et al are all fine actors in their own way, but floundering here. Plum actually gives quite explicitly detailed descriptions of all the characters at Blandings, in his own inimitable way, and these have been completely ignored (if you want to get a true flavour of Lord Emsworth, Lady Constance & Beach, read Lord Emsworth and the Girl Friend, once described by Rudyard Kipling as the perfect short story-it's only 20 pp long). The language is wrong, the accents are most certainly wrong, and even the wardrobe leaves a lot to be desired. When ITV made Jeeves and Wooster, the main reason for the series' success was that they stuck like glue to dialogue and plotlines. Any fan of Wodehouse will tell you that the true pleasure of reading the books lies in the (by his own admission, already archaic and eccentric at the time of publication) language-the slang. Plum spent hours, days, weeks and even months refining and redrafting his chef d'oevre(s), and yet the BBC, in their infinite wisdom, seem to think they can blithely ignore his efforts, and substitute poorly crafted and ill thought-out dialogue that he would have been mortified to publish. I shall not be watching the rest of this series, and am hugely disappointed. The BBC should be ashamed of themselves-a total waste of licence payers' money!..

I've seen things you people wouldn't believe...

reply

Yes it's not exactly in the same class as the old Ralph Richardson/Stanley Holloway series of yore. On the other hand if it does awaken an interest in Wodehouse then it will not be entirely in vain. Many of his books are out of print as the subjects are considered too old-fashioned to appeal to a modern audience. If this can somehow redress the balance it will have had some saving grace.

reply

[deleted]

For people who have read the books, the series is going to be a disappointment.

However, to the mass majority of the viewers who have never heard of PG Wodehouse, never mind read the books this would be ok although rather silly and enoyable viewing at 6:30 in the evening.

Its that man again!!

reply

Have to agree, I tried sitting this out and watching it, but its too painful to watch! I'm a massive PG Wodehouse fan, and have all of the books and Jeeves and Wooster DVDs. Maybe that was the standard I was hoping for, but unfortunately, this has not lived up to my expectations and is just awful!
I agree, I think that this has totally been miscast as you have said, and looks more like something to a panto.
Its a shame really as I really like all the actors individually and was looking forward to a new Wodehouse series.

reply

Cheerful nonsense.

The problem is that Plum was such a great writer that no movie/stage/whatever adaptation can match him. But the TV version provided a pleasant half hour and you can't say fairer than that.

reply

i consider this a parody and can watch it easily that way

reply

As a long time reader of PG Wodehouse - this has been a monumental disappointment for me.
The characters are too brashly stupid to enjoy -and have absolutely none of the genius and subtlety of the originals. I felt I was watching an damn awful pastiche, put on by sixth form pupils for their drama class.

Timothy Spall and Mark Williams play their parts to understated perfection - the rest are gurning pantomime characters.

I can't imagine anyone being inspired to read the books after seeing this.
I laugh out loud when reading them - but wailed, gnashed my teeth, and wanted to heave a boot through the telly, by the time I'd seen three episodes of this.

reply

Its a pleasant half hour. I have not read the books so not bothered about the miscasting arguments. I doubt there will be a second series though.

Its that man again!!

reply

Not read the books but love this. Highlight of the week.

reply

All credit to the BBC-once you've found a p***-poor format that's universally reviled, ignore the critical reviews, and instead, commission a new series- I cannot honestly believe that they're throwing even more licence payers' money down this drain...

I've seen things you people wouldn't believe...

reply

It is dreadful; I agree. Most of the characters are straight out of cartoonland. The castle is nice. Timothy Spall is lovely, and even though he doesn't match Wodehouse's physical description of Emsworth, I think he's suitable for the part and his sweet ditheriness is pleasant. Thinking back to the books, though, and the absolutely joyous delight they are, I realised nary a smile crossed my face while watching this travesty. Such a shame. As if the script wasn't dreadful and acting OTT enough, I kept wondering what loony decided the bizarre perms and hair teasing on Enfield and Spall looked right.

Jeeves and Wooster with Fry and Laurie: sublime! Then this mess... :(

reply

I still watch Jeeves and Wooster with my 12 year old daughter and we absolutely love it. Unfortunately Blandings has disappointed as it just doesn't have the sheer class or performances as J and W.

Gail - "Oh yes I do love poetry, I memorised all of Pam Ayers."

reply

Agreed, well, its not as if its their money they are wasting, is it? I can understand that the bbc are not supposed to be critically or even ratings driven, but there is a limit. And this is it. If as you say everyone, and thats EVERYONE, pans it, we aren't looking at an emerging classic.

The OP pretty much covered everything for me, apart from Saunders being a fine actor, obviously, and not just miscast, completely and utterly wrong for the part she plays. Jack Farthing (the Hon. Freddie Threepwood) is the only reason I watch it, he does suit the vacant upper class twit part perfectly and does it well, though with not much to work with. Why didn't they look at Jeeves and Wooster by Fry and Laurie to see how its done first? Good as they are, even they are not a patch on the books.

But what a wasted opportunity. I really want to like it, I am watching it, but on the whole, apart from the odd very small PG Wodehouse glimmer of genius, it is awful.

reply

I'm seething!.. It's like watching some hideous slow-motion replay of a car wreck-but I'm unable to tear myself away...Notwithstanding the explanations offered by the production company http://www.pgwodehousesociety.org.uk/tvradio.html, these episodes are riddled with inconsistencies-Hugo Carmody (Max Olesker), employed as Emsworth's secretary, a salaried member of staff, not a guest, and therefore subject to a more hidebound code of dress and behaviour, spent most of this evening's episode with his tie undone at half-mast, and then attended dinner in the same costume, while the Hon. Freddie Threepwood wore a dress suit... This is just so wrong on so many levels I don't know where to start... My main concern is that the newer generations watching this tripe will never be tempted to enjoy the written word...

I've seen things you people wouldn't believe...

reply

I have to agree with most of the posters here. This Blandings series was utterly dreadful, and an insult to fans of Plum's writings...and indeed to Plum himself.

reply

I'm an American who's crazy about P.G. Wodehouse. I've read all of his Blandings books, the entire Jeeves series and other stuff too such as Mr. Mulliner, Ukridge, Psmith, Uncle Fred and most of the stand-alone novels. Twenty years ago I laughed uproariously at Jeeves & Wooster on the telly. I even own a DVD of that old Wodehouse film, A Damsel in Distress, starring Fred Astaire! So when it comes to Pelham Grenville Wodehouse, I pretty much know what I like....

And maybe there's something intrinsically wrong with me---was I dropped on the head as a baby?---but, um, well, I actually LIKE Blandings. A lot. Yes, the show takes a lot of liberties in re the writing. It's based only loosely on the Sacred Texts. It's set up as a sitcom, with four offbeat, dysfunctional main characters in a decrepit old castle. It's over-the-top humor. But hey, its cast couldn't be better, at least in my humble opinion.

Timothy Spall has captured the essential goofiness and dodderingness (is there such a word?) of Clarence, ninth Earl of Emsworth. The pig doesn't look right, she ought to be a black Berkshire, but she's one helluva wonderful bit of bacon all the same. Jennifer Saunders is a magnificent Lady Constance...a somewhat more human Lady Connie than Wodehouse's, I might add. Wodehouse focuses on Connie's snobbery and ego, whereas in the TV series she's depicted more as a harassed woman just trying to restore order to domestic chaos. And Jack Farthing as Freddie is absolutely wonderful, the best thing I've seen yet in any Wodehouse adaptation. Hope to see more of this gifted comedic actor in future. Both versions of Beach work well too, and the actor playing Galahad (in American parlance) hit the ball right outta the park!

Maybe I'm less critical than English viewers because of the dearth of good (scripted) comedy on American TV. What do we, your neighbors across the pond, have that's as funny as Blandings? Only The Big Bang Theory. Oh yeah, and old reruns of Seinfeld and Frasier. Apart from that, though, we really don't have much that's memorable. Selfishly I hope that Blandings stays on the air a long time because it'll leave a great big gap in my heart if and when it departs.

reply

I have to agree. I recently re-read "Pig-hoo-o-o-o-ey" and was struck by its inexhaustible brilliance. The opening scene where Lord Emsworth and Lady Constance talk past each other is already so masterfully crafted, it's begging to be put on screen with the right actors. In the hands of people with great comedic timing, that scene could work so well, there's hardly a need to modify it in adaptation. And similar incidents follow throughout the story.
So I decided to give Blandings a try but I just can't get on board with it. Timothy Spall is a great actor but he just isn't right as Lord Emsworth. He definitely has good moments, as does Jack Farthing, but the dialogues have been exchanged for a puerile mess. I also agree with the other posters that the Jeeves & Wooster series with Fry & Laurie was brilliant, so it clearly isn't a case of Wodehouse's works being that hard to adapt...

reply