MovieChat Forums > Muck (2016) Discussion > Who was AVA?

Who was AVA?

posted 9 years ago by JoeHud
2 replies | jump to latest

Her name seems intentionally blurred out in the ending credits, yet seems to have the exact same breasts as Audra van Hees.

Edit: from the-filmreel.com:

"The film picks up after two people have already been killed, although we never really know what happened to them. This may have something to do with the fact that one of the victims, Ava, is played by a person who has their name blurred out in the end credits. Maybe they watched the film before it was released and realized that they wanted nothing to do with it. That can happen when a movie starts with a five minute credit sequence of a topless girl covered in mud twirling around in a marsh."

Such a mystery!

[–] jeffyoung1 9 years ago

I noticed the same thing, too. It's obvious the actress had second thoughts about her topless scene, which shouldn't have mattered since the camera never shows her face completely. But this has been known to happen in Hollywood where actors and directors either have their names deleted or changed to another name.
I don't think we'll ever know unless someone who knows someone who knows someone in the know fesses up, but that's unlikely to happen. The informant will be easily found out and risk possible legal action.

Like you, it seemed AVA resembled one of the other actresses in the movie. I thought it might have been the other one running around in her black underwear.

[–] claymation39 9 years ago

I think it was the same girl that was in the shower. They probably didn't have another actress so they used her instead, blurred out her name and never shown her face so that we all get this idea thats is a very different girl.