MovieChat Forums > O Som ao Redor (2013) Discussion > The ending (spoilers ofcourse)

The ending (spoilers ofcourse)


I really enjoyed the movie, but the neding was weird. Why was it neccessary with the plottwist about the old man (can't recall his name) being responsible for the death of the father of the two guards?

The whole movie worked perfectly fine with describing the everyday lives of the characters. The thing which worked really well was that it described it through different "trivial" things like the Bia buying a new tv, Dinho giving João the wrong stereo etc.

At no point we heard anything about the death of the guard's father and the incident isn't explained in any other way then it's said "do you remember a certain day in 1984?".

So what's the point with the plottwist? It's rather out of context, we don't know if the old guy deserved to be punished, we don't know how his family reacted etc?

reply

The climax was too ambiguous and opaque for my tastes. I saw the film tonight at the L.A. Film Festival. Also, the dream sequences seemed odd - not that dreams always are logical, but how do they fit into this narrative? I suspect that the director was trying to pull off something ambitious and emotionally complex - and to some extent succeeded - but the movie was a mixed bag for me. I would have liked to see more of ne'er-do-well Dinho, as well.

reply

From what I understood, that final twist ment that the rural life from which the characters (specially that old man, who actually lived there) try to run away, managed to find them in the privacy of their "perfect" and "secure" urban lives. It's not so important why the security men wanted to kill the boss, but that they represented a danger from rural towns (shown in the opening images) that gained his trust and entered his private urban circle, and all of that just so they could kill him.

reply

Yes, that's the way I understood it as well. I think the whole security setup was a scam to get access to the neighborhood, and gain the older man's confidence. And, my thought is that at the end of the movie, the revenge killing was on its way, and would take place in a few moments. It's interesting that the older man couldn't even remember the event until they reminded him. Then he realized who the two guards were, and why they had chosen this method of revenge. Red-125

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

I hardly think the ending is "Marxist," which is far too simplistic a reading of the complex history the entire story captures. As the opening stills suggest, the past history of Recife (and Brazil) hovers over and behind the present.

Thus the class and color differences the film portrays, the distinct and differing ways the characters work or don't, the anomie and ennui the wealthier characters display vs. the simmering anger and resentment the poorer people show, and so forth. The past even invades the dreams of the wealthier characters, such as when João and Sofia go to the engenho (sugar mill), or when the girl has the nightmare of the thieves invading.

The one direct link is the final payback involving Clodoaldo and his brother from Paraná. (That the brother has come back from Paraná parallels the historical movement of people from the rural and urban northeast of Brazil to the far wealthier south-central (São Paulo, Minas Gerais, whose capitals are mentioned at one point) and southern (Paraná, Santa Catarina, Rio Grande do Sul) states.)

I did think the ending left too many loose ends. The impressionism and associativeness was fine, but I only wish there had been a few more threads, strands or bows tied together, even if not so neatly.

"Neighboring Sounds" is very provocative, distinctive film by any measure.

reply

The ending made sense to the context of Neighbouring Sounds. It was obvious the security guards had a secret agenda (as some of the neighbors suspected), so the plot twist was no surprise. As for the surreal moments some feel are out of place, they clearly are character introspection. They offer an insight into their emotions adding to Neighbouring Sounds's context.

I'd rather be hated for who I am, than loved for who I am not.

reply

They didn't took revenge because he was a wealthy capitalist. They did it because the Coronel* killed their father and uncle over a misplaced fence dispute. The typical Coronel was above the law in the old days.

* http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coronelismo

reply

Guys, this was about the rich and the poor. The easy going life of the protagonist (our hero?) was the result of the manslaughter his grandfather did back in the day (this was hinted by the blood waterfall). So, altought he is not to blame, is it fair that he has this easy life even tought the reason why he has it ment destroying other families?

reply