II vs III
As much as I absolutely love Diablo III, there are a few things that I was disappointed in. The main thing was that I thought they got really lazy at the end. The game starts out and it's awesome. Act I is amazing, as is Act II. Act II is so long and great it really makes you remember how great the Diablo series is and how much we all fell in love with it. Then comes Act III. Then (really fast after) is Act IV. Then you fight Diablo. It feels like they rushed the end of the game. It's nothing like how the end of D2 was, which was way longer. Anyone agree? If not that's ok, it's just my opinion. Even before seeing Diablo, in 2, you have to do things, ie unlock the seals. After unlocking the seals, you fight a sh!t load of enemies. In D3, all you did was locate the places to find Diablo, and that's it. It seems like the creators spent too much time on the graphics and stuff to make a solid ending/story. In Diablo 2 there just seemed to be more to do (quest wise) than at the end of 3.
I'd like to hear your thoughts:
Do you agree/disagree?
Did you think it was fine the way it was?
What would you change?
What would you like to see in the game?
What things did you not like about D3?
Also, I didn't like how there were only a limited amount of spots to use skills. You should be able to make whichever button on the keyboard you want. Just a minor issue with the game. Still think it's awesome, though. Maybe they'll make a patch/update later and it'll extend/change the game in the future.