There a lot of people in this documentary that are what is wrong with this world. They showed extreme of both sides, the defenders and the opposition. It makes the documentary more dramatic and interesting. I live in Pennsylvania and I am not a fan of Penn State. I am a Buckeye fan. First off, the wins should never have been vacated to begin with. This scandal did not have anything to do with what happened on the football field or the team itself. If Penn State paid players to come there, different story. As for the people in this film, the fan that loves Penn State and had several pictures of Paterno in his dorm, showed the unhealthiness of culture and hero worship. Other disturbed the same traits. None of them could accept that their hero(es) weren't perfect. Should have Paterno done more, yes he should have. He knew Sandusky was running a charity for children and he could have squashed that. He could have stopped all of this. He was the most powerful man in that town. He could run for mayor and everyone would have voted for him including his opponent. That is why he is more vilified than McQuery, Shultz, Curry, etc. All of those men, and use the term lightly are just as guilty or more. No one did anything. The guy at the statue blamed Paterno more than the people I just named but he was more right than the opposing views we heard. People will drink the Kool-Aid of what the Paterno family claimed we were tricked by Sandusky and Joe did the right thing? If Sandusky pulled th"wool" over their eyes why did Paterno ban him from campus after finding out about the allegations? Joe started out doing the right thing, but failed to protect the kids he claimed he loved and wanted to make into better men all his life. Joe treated Sandusky as if he were an alcoholic or a drug addict which is wrong on both accounts. This was a whole different monster.
http://www.imdb.com/name/nm2604794/
reply
share