Tom? Tom? TOM! TOM!


I'm posting just to vent about the things I could not handle. As a movie fan, particularly of the thriller/horror genre, I have no problems with having to work the answers out for myself, an ambiguous ending, and subtle things that not everyone picks up on. That has nothing to do with why I did not care for this movie. A list:

-Well obviously, I felt that the actress screamed and said the name "Tom" far too often. She also screamed EVERY SINGLE TIME something remotely spooky happens, which is a shame because silence can really instill actual fear in the viewer until they are startled by an obnoxious scream. Once in awhile is fine, but I swear every time anything happened this chick began mouth breathing through her ugly teeth and then screaming once or twice, and then shouting, "Tom! Tom?!" over and over again. It was pretty aggravating. I heard they didn't have a script? Well, sometimes having a script can stop annoying repetitive things from happening in your movies. Just saying.

-I enjoyed the idea of a maze luring potential victims to a hotel that may or may not exist, whether or not the maze is supernatural or just some psycho out there changing all the signs on you. It's a good idea for a horror movie. My only problem with it is that it just happened to be placed right in the middle of a blackout zone for the GPS. Are there devices this guy could have used to cause this to happen? If so, that makes sense. I just found it weird and TOO thought provoking as a viewer when the GPS suddenly sprang back to life. I would have also enjoyed seeing how she got out of the maze, but oh well. That's just nitpicking.

-Opening the gate with the huge chain on it was just one of those things that your average person is just not going to accept at face value. Can I accept that this is a horror film and people do dumb things in horror films? Yes. But I can't imagine booking a room at this motel and not being weird-ed out by the "guide" who just points and drives off (never even meets them, actually! How did they even know he was a guide?), and then they STILL have to unlock this gate to drive into the area the motel is supposed to be in? Who would really fall for that? Apparently....TOM!

-It was quite obvious to me from the second Max (Max? I think that was his name. We'll call him Psycho Man) got in the car that he was the big bad wolf. That scene could have been great and suspenseful, but the way Tom kept looking in the mirror with his mouth hanging open in what appeared to be shock and awe, was just...ODD. Like, I kept asking myself, "Why does he have that look on his face?" You might think it's because he was in on this whole thing and couldn't believe his co-conspirator had showed up, but then it seems he doesn't know anything after all, because he ends up dead. So why the face? Little things like that really grate my cheese...If they can't act without a script, give them a script.

-Speaking of, they could not hide in a dark forest to save their lives, clearly. Turn off the freaking flashlights, nimrods.

-The incident in the pub. I think we were supposed to think it was more than it was, and that was just annoying when I found out that 1: I'd never get to find out what really happened and 2: a lot of time was wasted on that repetitive conversation they had about it in the car, during which Tom's name was again said several times. Honestly, that was about the only thread of a plot this movie even had, so losing it was not a good move.

-The car is out of gas, there's a psycho chasing me, I don't know where my sort of boyfriend is, and now here I am back at the car which I insist on getting in and out of multiple times and THERE'S GAS. OMG. Better use it, I'm sure it's not to get me to keep driving through this death maze. Sure, her other option was to just sit there and rot and potentially be attacked later on, but if there's one thing you should probably have in your set of survival skills it's knowing whether or not you are being duped by the person who has been stalking you through the woods for hours. Especially when they conveniently leave the very thing you desire the most for your escape.

-I just didn't care. I didn't care that Tom was dead. What did I know about him? That he had been dating this tooth girl for 2 weeks? That he lied about some weird thing that apparently never happened in a pub? That he doesn't like light on him while he's taking a whiz outside? Nothing. Same with the chick. I just did not care about either one of them. Poor job on the actors' parts, methinks. Furthermore, even if I didn't need to know anything about Psycho Man to understand his motives, which is fine, I can use my imagination, he wasn't even remotely scary. Actually, he was kind of goofy. Plus he laughed when the car scene was over and he got out, in a way that made me wonder if this was all some elaborate prank. So they lost all of the tension when he was revealed.

I'm sure I have a lot more to say, even though I've already said a lot, but I just had to get it out. Nothing makes me angrier than a bunch of people talking about how "scary" and "atmospheric" and "eerie" a movie is and then watching it and being distracted by terrible acting, directionless story, SCREAMING, and a big collection of no scares. A couple of jump scares? Yes, you will find those in this movie. But nothing that would chill you to the bone. In Fear is only worth watching if it's free. You'll need an imagination to fill in the holes, and I am okay with that, but no amount of imagination can take care of annoying performances or sheer stupidity. That's all!

reply

I can't believe I paid for this. Dumb move not to check ratings here.

I agree with all of the above. I guess the reason I'm bummed is cause as you pointed out, it could have been much better.

reply

Yeah they didn't have a full script. Only Allen Leech knew everything, Ian and Alice had no idea what was going to happen each day they got on set therefore her constant screaming whilst completely irritating was a genuine reaction though I agree the film was weird in places due to certain reaction such as Tom gaping mouthed during Max's fist few scenes but apparently Tom was meant to be in a state of shock.

It seemed fairly clear that was the guide to the hotel because he had the hotel name and logo on the back of his truck and they had arranged to meet someone from the hotel at that time in that place so else would they assume when he pulled up?

The closed gate is odd though as there a lots of gates closed with chains in the countryside and they do comment that it was strange at the time. I've stayed on camp sites where you have to get out of your car to unchain a gate whenever you want to leave the site. I guess my point is they may have assumed the hotel was on a private road or something.

The Pub incident was just a red herring. What I admired about the film is that for along while you really don't know whats going on, whether its a group of people, a madman, one of them is involved, they are both dead, they are being haunted. I agree though they did build the pub thing up too much to the point that even though we know it had nothing to do with the plot we still wonder what actually happened. I think Max's version was correct and that Tom spilled the other man's drink. He was getting far to agitated when the topic of the pub was brought up and plus when they first leave the pub he looked pretty dry.

Finding the gas in the car is blatantly a set up I agree but what could she do at that point? Stay on foot and run? She pretty much backed into a corner there (metaphorically)

If you were not aware of the motivation it is this. Max is fascinated with this experiment in which he wants to try to see what it would take to provoke a complete stranger into attacking him to the point of killing him. He loves standing in front of cars to see what will happen and is fascinated by the idea of finding the one person who will not swerve so basically terrorises some people before hand and then gives them the opportunity to kill him to see what they will do. Also he has this notion that if they become violent with him first then he can claim self defence (according to the dvd extras) which is why he laughs at them in the car and walks away. They should have just got the hell out of there at that point but Tom chose to go after him into the woods and start a fight which was a risk that cost him as it turned out Max was the better fighter.

I mean clearly there's something odd with me because I like the film even with all of its fault and I'm not oblivious to them though who knows why we are attracted to certain thing. I wont say its scary i'll just say I enjoyed it. But I think it definitely is atmospheric. not sure what a "no scare" is Does that mean not scary or that there was no threat behind it?

reply

it was just an abysmal film.

there are no explanations. it just sucked.

reply

After I saw this movie I walked around the house going Tom? Tom? Tom! Then I came and saw your post and LMAO. Ha!

reply

Same here! I was yelling, "Shut up, for cripes sake, Lucy!"

reply

I just laughed so hard when you said that Tom apparently doesn't like light on him when he's peeing! I was sitting there going, "Why the hell was he screaming at her to turn the light off?". I mean, I saw Max there behind him, but it took me out of the moment that was supposed to be scary because of the stupidity of the script/acting.

I agree with pretty much everything you said though. The script was horrible. The female's acting seemed so forced. The guy who played Tom wasn't too bad, but because of the script, I didn't give a damn about what happened to him. The twists were predictable. When she went to get her coat out of the trunk, and she came back and just stood there having a conversation with Tom from outside of the car, I just shook my head for about a minute straight because I knew that she was going to get grabbed. I too knew that as soon as Max got in the car that he was the bad guy or he was involved somehow. It was too easy! The ending was just idiotic. It was like the writer was trying for a thought provoking ending because Max told the story about the kid who jumped in front of the car, and we're supposed to be left wondering if she ran him down or swerved. Ugh... Pure stupidity. Awful movie.

reply

Tom was a total chump. First of all how you gonna let a stranger into your car and not pull his ass out of it right away? He had plenty of chances to knock the piss out of that guy,but wussed out instead. And Lucy just sitting there in the passenger seat while she had the chance to jump in the drivers seat and bail? Weak moves all around.

reply

I found it very watchable but full of gormless holes. I wondered whether the director was being deliberately obtuse.

reply

^This nailed it. Well done.

reply