Julia Garner's back!


Damn that girls hot. Don't know why Philip is randomly seeing her again but i'm glad to see her back.

reply

She's just a kid! Lol.

reply

Shes 22 years old.

reply

Really! She looks like she is 17, just like her birthday cake!

reply

I just came here to say YAY KIMMYS BACK.
I guess Phillip has been working her this whole time, because he has to collect the tapes or whatever with that briefcase.
What I don't get is how is the briefcase at the house when Kimmy's dad is not home? If he's working late, wouldn't he still have his case with him?
Oh well suspension of disbelief.
But it reminds us that all the former sources are probably still being worked even if we don't see them every week.
Also, how old is Kimmy turning? it's her b-day. If it is the 18th b-day I wonder if she will start trying to bang Phillip? Like hey I'm legal now...
I mean doesn't she ever wonder why this older guy keeps coming around when she's NOT screwing him? that alone is highly suspicious.

reply

That was her 17th birthday. I don't think Phillip wants any banging of her, even when she turns 18, but I'm thinking, he may have no choice if he wants to keep her as a source.

reply

Oh I know he doesn't want to, but I think she does want to. If it was her 18th birthday she might have renewed her efforts but since it's only her 17th, it's a moot point. At least when she's under 18 he has an excuse to give her but if she had turned 18 it might be harder (for him) to keep saying no.

reply

Isn't the age of consent 16 in DC though?

reply

I think it is 18 in all the US, to have full consent for sex with anyone of any age. There might be some states where it is legal for a 16 yr old to have sex with another 16 yr old (or a 17 yr old). But the same 16 yr old having sex with a 30 yr old would be illegal. The law is trying to avoid large gaps in age while still recognizing that it's pretty normal for teens to have sex with other teens.
But then there are also states where it's legal for a younger teen to get married to an older adult if they have parental consent. So if they can marry then they must be allowed to have sex?
And I don't know if it's still true now, but there used to be different age of consent for girls than for boys in some states. It's probably all the same now but I don't know about the 80's.

reply

It's 16 in DC. Phillip is free and clear to up the ante.

But oddly, if he took nude photos of her, that would still be illegal kiddie porn.

reply

Was it still 16 in the 80's, if the partner was much older?
I am sure he just feels creepy since his daughter is the same age.
That doesn't stop a lot of men from dating or marrying girls younger than their daughters, but it is creepy.

reply

Look, I'm not saying it wouldn't be gross for a 40 year old Phillip to have sex with a 17 year old.....just saying it isn't illegal in DC. (And I doubt the legal age would have gotten lower since the 80s).

Although, are we sure that this girl doesn't live in MD or VA. I think Virginia's might be higher.

reply