I am about to post one of the most unpopular suggestions ever on how to fix Detroit. Ready? Here it goes.
There's a reason why there's a lack of jobs in Detroit and why everything there is in shambles. It's the people. I guarantee you that if we were to replace 90% of the people in Detroit with---say---hardworking Chinese immigrants, the housing prices will spring up over night. New small businesses would rapidly open up. Crime would be reduced. People from other places would move to Detroit and the city will experience a renaissance that has never been seen before. Nothing would have changed but the people.
But of course, you're not going to kick out the people already living there. What I would do is wall-off Detroit with only a couple of ways to leave and enter. I would then install outdoor cameras on every block and have every person who want to live in Detroit be implanted with a chip that only tracks their GPS location and nothing more. Visitors to Detroit would need to register to get into the city and wear a tracker around their neck at all times. What's the purpose of all this you may ask? Well, if you can eliminate violent crime to almost zero and can claim the title of America's safest city or even safest city in the world, people are going to willingly move to Detroit. Thugs who commit violent crimes do it because they think they can get away with it. But if someone is shot or raped under my version of Detroit, police would only have to see who was in proximity of the victim's tracker at the time of the crime or where the body was found and use surveillance footage from cameras as further evidence as to who done it. All this will add up to be the ultimate deterrence in stopping crime before it starts. Why would you ever shoot someone if you know you'll be ID'd with little effort in a matter of a hour or less?
When crime drastically goes down, real gentrification will take place. People will want to move in. Not just flower planting hipsters, but couples with children who want to move to Detroit for the still cheap real-estate and the safety there. These people will be the ones who'll create the businesses and be the pillar of their communities. They will be the ones who are going to lay down the foundation for further generations to come.
Now I know what you're all thinking: "It's oppressing, it's totalitarian, it's 1984!". Listen, you're already carrying a tracker in the form of a smartphone anyway; The Feds could track you down through your phone's GPS if they really wanted to. Yes, people hate surveillance cameras. It's even politically correct to hate on them. But if you think about it, they probably brought more criminals to justice and done more good for society than bad. In fact, I'm betting that you or someone you know have a surveillance system setup to protect a business.
So to sum it up, I think a safe place to live and the abundance of cheap real estate (within city limits no less) is more than enticing to bring people and jobs to Detroit, even at the cost of each other's GPS whereabouts and outdoor privacy. That is a trade off I would do and that's how I'd fix Detroit.
reply
share