so many 1 votes...


Why?

do these people wish people with AIDs would die? Are these Fred Phelps family members? Because that is just a horrible thing to wish upon another person who did nothing to you.

Maybe they got AIDs by accident during a health care service or maybe they made a mistake, like having unprotected sex or sharing needles, but do they deserve to suffer and die? Heck No. That's cruelly insane.

You hate people just because they have AIDs and will attempt to keep people from celebrating advances in medicine that save lives? *beep* you.



Change American Politics through VOTE SWAPPING!
https://www.facebook.com/VoteSwap2012

reply

This movie sadly has been trolled and gained a low and undeserved weighted score.

My Music: www.kittysafe.net
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/catnipdream

reply

I don't think it's being trolled per se. It's just rampant homophobia.

reply

tomato tomahto :)



My Music: www.kittysafe.net
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/catnipdream

reply

It's being trolled. Look at this: 100 fresh on Rotten Tomatoes and a low 5 rating on IMDb? Someone is rigging the vote and I place the blame squarely on the right-wing, homophobic, prejudiced, sociopathic ignoramuses.

reply

Any movie that is even slightly controversial (and many that aren't) get a ton of 1 votes, its just the way it goes. To think it is some sign of vast hatred of people with AIDS is more than a little ridiculous though.

I thought it was a fairly good film, although it felt at times more like a commercial for Act Up than an actual documentary (it ended with a URL, for crying out loud). For my taste it was a little too celebratory of the people who barricaded streets and started chants, and not celebratory enough of the people (scientists, researchers, doctors) who actually did the hard, life-saving work on these drugs.

reply

I think it depends on one's definition of "hard work". I think that the term most definitely applies to a lot of the people who were facing (at that time) a terminal diagnosis and in some cases were very ill, marching in the streets, risking arrest, being assaulted by police and standing up against a seemingly unbeatable bureaucracy in an effort to save the lives of others not to mention their own. Which is not to say that the scientists, researchers and doctors did'nt play a significant role themselves. But honestly, at the time I think I'd rather have been a highly paid medical professional living a relatively comfortable existence with all the security and benefits that provides rather than a young person of limited means in an already socially persecuted minority trying to battle the system and at the same time keep my head above water.

reply

I am not questioning that many of those people were passionate and dedicated, but my point was simply, what good does that do? Sure, getting angry and protesting and "raising awareness" is cathartic, but in most cases, it doesn't help in any real way. There are other people whose hard work actually saved thousands of lives, and they were largely ignored in this film.

I am not sure we should be so quick to label someone a hero just because they yell loudly.

reply

Being passionate and dedicated enough enough about a cause to protest (angrily) against a government that is seemingly indifferent to the needs of it's citizens (even the gay ones) in a time of crisis is often the ONLY way of getting that government to address or even acknowledge that the problem exists, which is exactly what happened. The researchers, scientists and medical professionals (mostly, but not exclusively) became involved well after the crisis began and largely at the behest of pharmaceutical companies and the FDA who, as well know, can and will speed the development of any drug if the market demands it and there are profits to be made. The film's title is "how to SURVIVE a plague" and imo the true heroes were and continue to be those trying to SURVIVE. Additionally, although some credit is due to the above mentioned professionals, the harsh reality is that even though some advances have been made in extending life expectancy of those living with HIV, there still is no cure and most of the drugs being used to achieve that extended life expectancy come with a laundry list of sometimes horrific side effects. ACT-UP and other protest groups imo should continue to yell loudly, angrily and yes, heroically until there is a cure.

reply

Fanboy nerds are overrepresented in the IMDB 250. Seeing as some are shut-ins, adolescent in psychology and uncomfortable about sex, it doesn't surprise me in the least that there are down-votes. Who cares? The film is amazing and the courage it documents is so inspiring. Let's hope and pray a horrible plague like AIDS never hits us again.

reply

Eh, what do you mean by "so many" 1 votes. Mind you, I haven't seen it yet so I can't vote on it. I'm here because it was nominated at the Oscars last night. I'm curious about the content. What do you mean by "so many?" It got more 10s..9s..8s..7s..and 6 votes than 1 votes. So the OPs question is.... puzzling.

reply

OP has posted almost 6 months before you do. For relatively new movies as that was at the time, votes come in quickly and thus the landscale changes. it is possible that at the time of his posting the 1s were the largest group, though thnakfully it is not the case now.

---------------------------------------------
Applied Science? All science is applied. Eventually.

reply

There are just as many people, who just vote 10, regardless of how good they thought the film was. The average is just fine.

reply