Lots of great information

this movie is just the latest retarded, unscientific, conspiracy-theory laden sh*t-pile to be released.

the average american is dumber than a rock and will believe literally anything if it's presented as "forbidden knowledge." Their stupidity is fueling the birth of a new genre

Hey,

Thought I'd post as there seems to be a real split with these types of programmes. I found this particular one to be a lot tamer than other offerings. I reply to your comment because you took the time to elucidate your thoughts instead of just saying *beep* As per the course of any reasoned debate I will endeavour to answer your points one by one.

1)"The rocks of the pyramids fit to the millimeter: NOT TRUE, go there and enter one you will see."

The hardest stone courses, what we would call today the "superstructure" are indeed perfect, and demonstrate remarkable stonecutting ability. I say stonecutting hesitantly, but I sense you would be hostile to the idea of casting stones, so nm. The imperfections you allude to do indeed exist, but only in what we would today call the tertiary structure of the pyramids. The Giza Plateu has been ransacked for stone, subjected to repeated attempts at destruction (natural and manmade), and even exposed to dynamite by the first "modern" Egyptologist. Yet the Pyramids still stand.

2) Pyramids have 8 faces: NOT TRUE, pyramids have somewhat caved in and part of their outer layer is gone. Remember that most of these monuments were buried in sand. (By the way, nice job advanced people of the past with your giant clock, brilliant enough to have this convoluted scheme but not enough to predict that this clock will be buried anyway in the future.)

Your missing something elementary here. They have not caved in, they have caved out. The sides are not, as you say, concave, but in fact convex, hence the shadow cast in the raf photograph (one quadrant light and one dark). This is simple otpics, and would have to be a design feature (unless an explosive force from inside bulged the sides at perfect right angles). Even had that happened, the structure is thousands of courses of solid granite and would likely not have budged (bear in mind the size of the "chambers"). As to being buried in sand, geological time changes your cornershop into a seabed. In fact I find it remarkable they predicted the location would not disappear under water.

3)Those people are too retarded to have tools to cut rocks: NOT TRUE, there were tools to cut those rocks, there are big stone cutting saws on display in cairo I think. They have just "forgotten" to show them.

The stone cutting saws you speak of are in fact from a much later period (4-600 ad) as masons in the nile delta attempted to repilicate the feats of engineering demonstrated in earlier times. They don't show them in the Cairo museum because they have nothing to do with Ancient Egypt. As for being "too retarded" as you put it, I agree with you, they most certainly were not.

4)Only civilizations with pyramids mummified their bodies: That's not only totally untrue but that's a blatant lie with no basis. Pick a book about mummification, nearly all ancient cultures practiced it, there are even mummies in churches (relics anyone?).

Completely true, there has even been found in China Arian mummies dating from around 1200 BC. Mummification has been a constant theme amongst world cultures and proto-civilizations which ostensibly had no contact with each other. A mystery in itself.

5)Pyramids all are oriented in the same direction: All cultures had the same north. Is it surprising??? Anyway I am not even sure that it in an absolute case anyway, I guess it's pretty easy to check on google map. (oh I forgot, THEY have time on their hands to photoshop pyramid orientations to hide the eye opening truth.)Most ancient FARMS (american homesteads even) are oriented in such manner also to conserve heat and not to put too much windows facing the direction the sun sets.

Again you miss something here, there is a distinction between "orienting" and being right on the money. The diagrammatic representation of the white house and the pyramid was, I was surprised to find, true. the degree of precision is astonishing. I remind you that in universities you can get a value of Pi down to about 12 digits, anything more is a military secret. Similar mathematical values we have only discovered in the last two decades, and are closely guarded secrets (because landing a projectile on someone's head on the other side of the world takes really good math). Is it surprising??? well yes frankly, given that we are speaking of a time when humans were still moving from a hunter/gatherer culture to an agrarian one. These people couldn't have known about electromagnetism surely? without realizing a wooden circle would convey a carriage? (while rolling huge blocks on tree trunks sourced from a desert 500 miles from a quarry, nobody thought of the wheel?) Accomplished without knowing they lived on a sphere? Ok.

6) Pyramids all align!!! Hahaha My house and yours align. On a sphere everything aligns. If you think that because it aligns on a world map (which is a subjective unfolding of the planet with a lot of distortion) it means anything I think you ought to think again.

I agree, I thought this part was highly spurious. Although I did find the similarities between the Easter Island petroglyphs and Mohenjo Daro petroglyphs intruiging (who wouldn't?). As pattern recognizing animals we are inclined to this sort of speculation.

7)All pyramid building civilizations make use of the same techinques: That is just a lie (again). Mexicans (aztecs) and Egyptians do not use remotely similar techniques. The angle are not the same, the building methods are not the same, the pyramid purpose are not the same. Even Egyptian pyramids vary in method and shapes. Most of their pyramids were flat topped.

The Egyptian pyramids on the Giza Plateu vary in size to a perfect mathematical ratio, so that the ratio remains the same to the naked eye viewed from any direction. Before I watched the documentary I was fascinated by the fact that ancient and ostensibly isolated cultures used the same methods of building stone courses. I had never considered the mechanical strength of these methods against earthquakes until I watched this. I was surprised to discover that the (modern) Japanese use similar construction methods for protecting their buildings. As for Pyramids being flat topped, there is variation here. The south American examples for the most part seem to have supported some structure since lost, whilst those pyramids tending towards apex seem to incorporate a pyramidion. I find it highly suspect that the Pyramidion on display at the Giza plateu "disappeared" and was replaced. This is it folks, this is the real apex, feast your eyes. Please. I would be interested in any mineralogical or metalurgical analysis of the original. Long before I watched this documentary I suspected these buildings were never tombs. There's no hieroglyphs, the passages are too functional and uncanny, the "rooms" too deliberate. The writing that exists is proven to be red lead based paint from desperate European adventurers, and the granite in the main rooms is so perfectly polished it wouldn't even tolerate paint. Theres something strange going on here.

I hope I've answered your points, or at least made you think. I'm really not sure why people are so hostile to mysteries, because like it or not they do exist. People tend toward the opinion (in my experience) that our species has only ever gone forwards and not backwards. This is a ridiculous assumption, in our heart of hearts we know it, because we make countless "end of days" films in the 21st century, and what literature we have from the ancient world tells us that civilizations rise and fall. It is a supreme arrogance to assume that "we" are the first and only technological civilization. Especially when the truth is so plain.