Selective casting?

and when I came on here, I glanced at the cast, and found out a majority of them are Americans.

Exactly what I did! I suppose they couldn't find another "Carey Mulligan" or more likely they didn't even bother to look! Some Americans must've been well connected to this project. American film industry have a soft spot for UK, London and the 60's (being their connection to Europe) and for their actors to act with a British accent playing a Brit in a historically important period in history is gonna look well on their film resume. With alot of British actors working in Hollywood and American TV, maybe there is some sort of agreement that American actors will be given more opportunities for British roles.

Not that I have any problems with that, besides American actors and vocal range.

I do have a bit of a problem with it. There's alot of British actors out there who were probably not given a chance with these roles. They probably would've done a better job, though Elle Fanning is indeed very talented. But I guess we can't complain with the large number of Brits in Hollywood.

I still wonder why Stephen Dorff got the role of Stuart Suttclife in Backbeat, although he did try, he lost the Liverpudlian accent and ended up sounding like he was from somewhere else altogether. He was an unknown then, yet the two lead roles in that "British" production was played by Americans.

reply share

add reply

formatting help

So... I should watch a film with a Timothy Spall substitute and be glad of it?

You may not enjoy Mr. Spall's acting as much as I do, but I feel that if they can cast him in a film, then they should.

Don't get me wrong, I think there are serious problems with the Hollywood pay scale, but these won't be tackled by limiting talented actors.

If actors made doctor money it would be fine. Doctors are, generally, millionaires but not billionaires. Sure, point me in the direction of a poor doctor and I'll probably discover a really shoddy doctor. Coincidentally.

I'd cite the Millionaire Next Door, but it's wasted on this crowd.

reply share

add reply

formatting help

[deleted]

Hey, at least Stephen Fry and Hugh Grant weren't in it.

reply share

add reply

formatting help

I saw the trailer and was disgusted, we give the great USA a lot of very good actors who star in their top hitting dramas and films, to the point that Americans think they are American (take Damien Lewis as an example) and then they make a film which should have been laden with the top British talent and use american actors/actresses. I could hear the awful accents from the first 30 seconds and feel insulted,, wouldn't be so bad if they could actually talk like a British person but they quite painfully cannot, whereas our British actors seems to be doing so well that when they win awards in America and it's revealed they are British the Americans literally don't believe it, I guess that's because they can act.

reply share

add reply

formatting help

What exactly is your point?

In an attempt to sound "clever" you've created a selection of words that don't really mean anything when read together.

Your first line: "Am I the only one who finds some film makers redundant in their rather selective use of specific British actors?" is trying so hard to sound profound that it disappears up its own pretentious backside. If you mean are you the only one that thinks some directors are lazy when it comes to casting their movies, just say so.

I'm not saying this purely to be a dick, you have perhaps a valid point in the middle of that over-written post, but it's lost among the film-school, English-lit wankery.

"Timothy Spall is a great actor, but I just can't conceive the thought of limiting the choice of actors here." literally makes no sense. You can "conceive the thought", because that's exactly what you're doing. You may as well have said you can't imagine a purple pineapple. Yes you can, otherwise you wouldn't have been able to write down the thing you thought of, that you say you can't think of.

And when discussing a supposedly selective list of British actors, don't then suggest that there are too many to list. "The list goes on"? Does it? Not that limited then, is it??

"(who funded the budget?)" And you were so quick to call others redundant!

"Not that I have any problems with that, besides American actors and vocal range. " So you don't have a problem with American actors, other than American actors and how they act? Bravo!

As I said, not mentioning all of these things just to be nasty, just suggesting you don't get too involved in the way you make your point to the extent that you then lose the point. And what you've written is of course a thousand times better than some of the *beep* you read on these forums.

And to answer your point, anything that casts Timothy Spall is alright in my book. The man is one of the best actors in this country and improves any movie he's cast in.

reply share

add reply

formatting help

Casting a movie is a part of the directors artistic vision. It is also highly dependent upon budget constraints.

Thankfully, in my opinion, directors can cast the person who best conveys their sense of who the characters are. Not everyone has to sping from the same postal code as the character they play. I am so tired of this regional actor and accent debate, who's from where and how authentic is the accent. It strikes me as the worst kind of political correctness.

Look past it to the performances and the material.

reply share

add reply

formatting help

Tbf, I'm pretty impressed with Elle Fanning's accent. Not sure about Christina hendrick's, as her accent wasn't really shown in the trail.

- We could be men with ven!

reply share

add reply

formatting help