A clear sign of money not resulting in quality


Non-existent confusing script. Wooden performances. Classic 100% evil (and stupid) villains.

The main character is claimed to be clear-minded, when he's most definitely not. All through the movie people detect him as the "100 year old guy" as if he had a sign saying that. Mixing in performances by foreign actors for no real reason just means they had more money than story to tell.

The only slightly interesting parts were the flashbacks, but they didn't hit the mark nearly as well as e.g. Forrest Gump.

Not even Robert Gustafsson is convincing, despite him doing excellent character roles before (in "Fyra nyanser av brunt" etc).

I'd rather watch Prometheus and Meet the Spartans mixed together in reverse 10 times, than this movie again, and I'm only exaggerating slightly.

And I'm a Swede.

reply

I agree. It is cliche and predictable. This movie is for kids.

reply

Perhaps you shouldn't read the book before watching the movie ;) I strongly disagree on it being predictable and for that matter the 7/10 is too low in my opinion for such a comedy. Perhaps the 100 year old man himself is not acted that good but everything else comes together quite nicely.

reply

I did unfortunally read the book and it also sucks. I'm baffeled that crap like that even went to print, the author should apologize to the trees.

X ~We are the people our parents warned us about

reply

Wow, you must be a really funny person to be around... NOT!

reply

What is so confusing about the script?

reply

@redsmurf, I agree with everything on your post.

X ~We are the people our parents warned us about

reply

Wow! Saw this movie last night with a friend, and we thought it was absolutely delightful!! Smiled all the way through it. We are both avid longtime foreign film goers, so it certainly cannot be that we are not sophisticated. I can see that it would not appeal to everyone, but I hope that those looking for a charming, quirky foreign language film experience will take a chance on this.

reply

I've seen it today and, for me, the problem is that it's constantly trying too hard to be so charming and so endearing... that it fails completely.

reply

Haha really? Because charming and endearing is certainly not what comes to mind when that guy gets blown up and his head comes flying.

When your mind breaks the spirit of your soul.

reply

Everything (specially the "old man"): All the reactions and the dialogues tried to be (in mi opinion, without success). Even in that scene repeating his phrase "which is typical when..."

Oh, heh, how funny the old man being charming even when he is relating he killed a man, he, he (but, wait! he was the merchant who made fortune scamming his mother, then it's ok!!)

I'm sure not everyone will see it the same way, of course, but I spent the two hours thinking for every minute on the film the same thing: It's trying to be something it's not. It's artificial.

reply

I see. I didn't have a problem with it. I mean, the man is 100 years old and it's a comedy so I think it's kind of inevitable that they're gonna play on the "charming" and "endearing" strings.

When your mind breaks the spirit of your soul.

reply

Fair enough. I do think you are too kind to Forrest Gump. Looking back on that film I am pissed off at it's conservative message of "go through life, don't rock the boat, don't ask questions". There were far better films in 1994 that deserved the Oscar. Pulp Fiction, Natural Born Killers, Shawshank Redemption. Speaking of Oscar, A couple of years ago I saw some great Scandinavian short film nominees. One was about a magician falling in love , think it was called Abracadabra. The othe was from Norway and it was spectacular. It was about an old man who lived by the sea and built a giant tuba. That film was outstanding.

reply

Wow, Every swede I meet online doesnt like it but every American ive met loves it. This film is far FAR superior to Forrest Gump. Its a wonderful dark comedy full of random humor. Its only now in the states and is a wonderful break from all the dumb blockbusters and super heroes. One if the best this year. If Swedes think this is bad other films over there must be superb.

reply

This movie is a bunch of cliches lumped together, but compared to any Marvel/DC/Hasbro or other explosion movie it might actually seem good. It could have been profound though, considering the material it was based on.

The only parts I appreciated somewhat were the flashbacks, but the modern day parts were just awful. The worst character was the all evil villain. Such people simply don't exist, and he was just used as a crutch to move the story along.

Looking at the Nordics as a whole we do make much better movies than this. I'm a Swede, but I especially like Danish movies. Swedish movies tend to lean towards theatrics, which in my opinion is a bad thing. We make many police/agent movies, and they become a bit laughable (and cringe-worthy) due to this. This is actually changing (maybe a generation thing), and younger actors tend to act more naturalistic.

And no, it was not better the FG. FG was philosophical in the sense that it challenged the "success is not caused by chance, but through hard work, yada yada" dogma. All FG's successes were through chance and he was almost completely ignorant throughout. People have a tendency to create a cause (luck, effort, right etc) even when the "cause" was completely random and beyond our control. I'm not talking fate. That's something else.

But as we say in Sweden: Smaken är som baken: delad (Taste is like the buttocks: divided; if I remember correctly, Forrest Gump was shot in the buttocks).

reply

Such people simply don't exist,
So you thought this was a realist work?

The realism fetish sucks.

reply

Actually, you think such cartoonish people don't exist, but I guarantee, they do.

They are rare, but they are out there.

reply

I felt the villains were portrayed as multidimensional. Take Ricky for example. The guy was an emotional wreck when his gf dumped him. If you're saying villains such as Alan Ford's character don't exist in real life, I assure you they do. Watching this with my brother and his wife we all loved the scenes with the Pim character in part because he reminds us so much of our dad's brother... The look, the speech. I think it's characteristic of a certain criminal class Londoner fom that generation. Our uncle is a career criminal with a one sided view of life, meaning anything that's not good for him is bad for him. People are objects to use toward an end goal and there are literally no people in his life that are above any of this. When I was a kid he commented about two people he had killed and there was no remorse at all. It was like he was telling me about mailing two letters... In other words, no one matters to him unless they can be used. In his eighties he hasn't mellowed but he's lost his clout within the criminal milieu. Not dangerous anymore but still a man so evil that he would gladly kill anyone in his family, including his children if they crossed him. When he dies, no one will mourn.

As for this fim, I enjoyed the random aspects and the fact that people who didn't know each other the day before are thrust into this crazy journey. total strangers are willing to become accomplices after the fact to murder and even help dispose of dead bodies. I guess I enjoyed the amoral element of the story.

reply

Wow, I can't believe you've been a member here since 1999. I don't think I've seen that before. I've seen 2000 but not someone from the 90's. Huh, crazy.

When your mind breaks the spirit of your soul.

reply

[deleted]

No, but a girlfriend. Or are you saying that I need a man to have any value? What's your problem? I just thought it was interesting and was kind of curious to what the site was like back then but I see you're not one to have a conversation so I'm shocked if you were able to get a partner. But I guess you're too old and boring to understand curiousity if you've been here since 1999.

When your mind breaks the spirit of your soul.

reply

[deleted]

LOL!! I wonder if you even realize how hypocritical you are being. And just as you thought? You started thinking what I was like just from one post. That's just creepy. But thanks for confirming that you are indeed old. However I have no problem with old people overall. Just the ones that get boring and grumpy and you're definetely one of them. Or maybe you always were. I'm quite sure you have always been an a-hole though. If you against all odds have found a partner I would be surprised if you haven't bored her to death by now.

What are you even doing reading articles like that? Just so you can have ammo against lesbians you feel have wronged you? That's just sad. But then again you have been here since '99 and haven't moved on yet so I guess that is expected.

When your mind breaks the spirit of your soul.

reply

I have more than one imdb (forum) membership, and strangely enough - since 1999 but was visiting the site from when it started, and I was visiting here as always, just to read the film info and get a feel from the comments what people felt about a film. I am not bothered either way if they loved or hated the film - and by extension when seeking to defend their POV, tempers flare and comments get overly personal. I am probably going to cause myself problems here and I wish to say up front that giving offense is the last thing I intend.

I am not commenting on personal details of your discussion with the previous poster; but I would like to address one point in general. Your last sentence. What has being a imdb member since 1999 got to do with 'moving on'? Does this mean you expect to get tired of imdb and find some other film forum to express your views a few years from now or that 'old people' should not be using this forum@ Should there be an age disclaimer with every post so that people may have allowances made for their age-related views.....

reply

I am not commenting on personal details of your discussion with the previous poster; but I would like to address one point in general. Your last sentence. What has being a imdb member since 1999 got to do with 'moving on'? Does this mean you expect to get tired of imdb and find some other film forum to express your views a few years from now or that 'old people' should not be using this forum@ Should there be an age disclaimer with every post so that people may have allowances made for their age-related views.....


You can't see what the other poster wrote since he deleted his posts but the guy was a complete douchebag so I was a little extra harsh because of that. I don't know if I need to find another film forum because it's not that important to me to express my views on movies or tv-shows to strangers. I only became a member because when I was looking up info here I was curious to read the message boards you could see at the bottom of the page and you couldn't do that when you were not a member. Many who were regs at the board I frequented when I first joined hasn't been signed in for years and that seems like a healthy thing to do since this place can be addictive and full of d-bags and trolls. So I would say they have all moved on in a sense.

I didn't mean to offend anyone else that has been a member for so long, it was just that guy was so bitter that it just seemed sad that he still hung around here to spread his bitterness after all that time. Like I said, I have nothing against old people in general but some do get bitter and grumpy with age and he was clearly one of them so that's why I brought it up.


When your mind breaks the spirit of your soul.

reply

[deleted]

Thank you for setting record straight, and you do seem to have reason to feel aggrieved, but I personally was not offended by your remarks. I do believe you need to have a certain resilience or thick-skin to be an active commentator on forums in general.

What you said re members not being signed in for years may occasionally be true, but I suspect like myself that members are just 'lurking' online but only reading, not taking part in any discussions. I do this all the time to pick up the 'flavour' and tone of many discussions in order to hopefully see all sides and come to a balanced view of a subject (film). Of course, this totally goes out the window when ensnared by an internet troll.
BTW - deleted post was me - incomplete copy/paste mess.

reply

It might be funnier if one could understand the language with vocal inflections, etc., but the subtitles are definitely not funny.

reply

Sorry, I can't take anybody who uses hyperbole seriously.

"Can you hear them singing?"

reply