Seal Team Six vs Zero Dark Thirty


Due to unequal budget, comparing these two movies is a bit unfair.
Anyway, Seal Team Six is a mockery for SEALs and inferior in almost every aspect:

1. The worst - SEAL's appearance, they look like boy scouts
2. Rest of cast is third-rate
3. Impression - pretty much as propaganda for Obama
4. Some facts around assault that are missing from Zero Dark Thirty, are here mentioned, particularly wider air support concept, contact with Pakistani jets and preparedness for clash with Pakistani military. Very interesting was agent's activity on site, around compound, which was not shown in Zero Dark Thirty.

Zero Dark Thirty is better in:

1. Overall cinematography
2. scenery and equipment are very authentic
3. likelihood of events is quite convincible
4. It goes much deeper in details
5. Dialogs sound closer to reality
6. Cast - perfect selection
7. Seal team characters look very authentic. Probably many of us already have seen pictures of real special forces soldiers from multiple sources available from Internet.
8. Maya is awesome - Jessica Chastain did excellent job
9. As we already know - SEAL's combat chatting and assault longevity were ridiculous - unnecessary failure.


Zero Dark Thirty is highly watchable; due to visual luxury and story comprehensiveness, it is multiple times better than Seal Team Six. In spite of missing critical facts shown in Seal Team Six and misrepresented SEAL's combat behavior it is absolute winner

reply

Zero Dark Thirty is far superior

I agree with all your points





When there's no more room in hell, The dead will walk the earth...

reply

I agree.. "Zero" is better.

reply

Boy scouts? You are an idiot! The film was very accurate in terms of seals. It is a million times better than that piece of crap torture film Zero Dark Thirty. It is much more historically accurate. Get better taste in movies you piece of crap!

reply

I agree with this 100%. For so many reasons this is much better than Zero Dark Thirty

reply

"Propaganda for Obama"

LOL, what a stupid comment.

I guess it boils down to his gutsy call to go ahead with this, and the fact that we've been safe for 8 years with this intelligent, classy President. Unlike Bush who had a difficult time putting a coherent sentence together. And unlike under the "Inept Twins," Bush and Cheney, who did nothing to stave-off an attack.

Cheney has wined and cried for 8 years about how unsafe we've been under Obama. When it was Bush and Cheney who were critically stupid, letting us be attacked after they were warned of "...flying planes into buildings," and did nothing. Just like that idiot-in-chief did by not asking a single question when he was briefed on Katrina.

Of course, I'm betting they will be remembered as geniuses after this new moron-in-chief *beep* the country...if we survive the lying douchebag.

reply