this is therapy?


Don't get me wrong, I enjoyed watching this documentary.. however, having studied as a therapist I couldn't help but think.. Ehm.. This is just therapy. Marina made some references about her own therapist/psychologist during the course of the documentary (which was a big give away) and in many ways I think that all she really did was try replicate this/her own experience of.. emptiness perhaps. I fail to see this as 'performance art' and to be honest, I feel like she undermined something sacred and pertinent in the name of her performance. Anyone who's ever gone to therapy will understand how it feels like to sit in front of a stranger in silence.. but.. Is this art?

She wasn't there to help people, and yes, people cried.. such is the power of 'presence'.. But she didn't care about these people nor for their individualism, as evident by the heavy security ready to oust anyone who dared to be different.. which for me.. seemed a far and hypocritical cry from her own past endeavours.

The entire thing seemed entirely self indulgent to me.. but having said as much, I hope she found what she was looking for because she seemed so entirely vulnerable, a shadow of the person and of the art that she used to portray.

reply

It's interesting. I am curious to the motivations of the people who went and sat opposite her. My thoughts are that it seemed they wanted to be seen, to have a space to feel unconditionally accepted. And she wanted the people to come to her and show her the love she didn't get when she was a child. I enjoyed it until the security guards began to step in and it started to feel a bit fake and I imagine Marina wouldn't mind the girl stripping etc. but it was probably more the museum requirements about what's appropriate. It's a shame as it spoiled it for me. If you're going to be there in that context then isn't the whole point not to cart people off as soon as they do something a bit unexpected.

reply

You're exactly right, it's therapy. But I think it's art because she's using a very specifically tailored method in each therapeutic act. This film focused on her 2010 piece, but it was also about her life's work, which covered a vast range of themes.

To me (and, I guess she says this specifically, as well), it's about energy-- or, what makes us, us. Who are we? Ultimately, it's a mystery. Sitting across from her wasn't supposed to be about her or how "special" she was, although the cultish following might give that impression. What makes this art, and what I think she's calling attention to, is what we find. The things that anchor us. What do we choose to look at in life?

We're so used to averting eye-contact, too busy avoiding other people-- let alone even taking time to truly sit alone with ourselves... What's that quote? All of men's problems stem from his inability to sit in a room and do nothing? Through her own life challenges & self-inflicted trials of concentration, she's already been there, done that. So, that's all I think she's trying to "enlighten." The first step, to be with yourself. Or, yourself. What does it mean to be yourself?

She provokes all these questions, and that, to me, is art in itself. Her unique method, and in this case even the simple imagery of two people sitting across from each other in chairs, is an artistic vision. Imagery/an experience which stands for something worth a thousand words.

I actually had the opportunity to sit across from her (and I'm in the film like, front and center for a good beat, but I don't want to say when), but because we had to "battle" the people in line, my mind wasn't settled enough and I didn't feel like I was truly in the moment as I could've been. But, I tried. I also broke the rules by giving the sign for "love" with my hand, and mouthing thank you and being generally kinda antsy, which got security riled up, but they didn't jump on me.

Anyway, so I have a personal bias I suppose... But, I couldn't do it. I'm still trying to work on it. Sitting... truly connecting. Working at Starbucks for 8 years has been the perfect playground for energy dynamics and interacting with people... Seeing what gets to the heart of people, of strangers, even in brief moments. I find that when I connect with someone by looking at, finding, the spark in their eye first, ignoring their physical appearance-- you can almost feel a weight lifted from that other person. Especially if they're someone who might feel/be persecuted often. It's amazingly refreshing to connect with people on a level where you don't make up ANY stories about them.

But I think that's what Marina is about. It's about that spark in their eye-- the spirit. We're all the same. It sounds very humdrum and Therapy 101, but it's an insanely difficult message to hit home. When someone gives us the freedom from persecution and expectations... When someone can look at us with a pure heart... Things bubble to our mind and we might be disgusted with what we see. Or maybe we have a revelation. Or maybe you just start crying, and you don't know why. Maybe it's being in awe of something beautiful, intangible, beyond words...

I didn't mean for this to be this long, but I just wanted to respond because you wrote a thoughtful review, and you're a therapist... and thought it was self-indulgent of her. I just can't see it that way.

reply