Thank you smallpox, except, I am a 'she'.
Yes, that was my point in saying it is a lost opportunity. By making one of the characters gay, you remove any possibility of a threat to the principal couple, therefore the only real 'threesome' is the unusual method of gaining sperm, which is, of course, the result of a crazy night drunk and/or high.
Would this show be any less different if she just asked her gay best friend for sperm and he said 'Ok as long as we all raise the child together' and her loving (sterile) boyfriend is not thrilled but goes along with it?
How many children are being raised with two dads now? Tens of thousands of children in the UK are being raised by non biological father, adding queerness (I am bisexual btw, I am allowed....)and a living together situation does not a subversive comedy make. Being subversive means taking risks. It would have even been more risky if it was another woman and the male impregnated his partners best friend and they decide to raise the child together, watch the sexual tensions, drama, jealousy and all the comic Polygamy gags.... This just another.....young irresponsible people have to grow up now...oooh he doesn't know how to change a nappy does he?? hahaha......standard sitcom.
When something has Threesome in a title it had either be an on going situation, otherwise it is bogus. They may as well have called it 'Did something a bit naughty once huh huh'.
If you love Satan and are 100% proud of it copy this and make your signature!
reply
share