MovieChat Forums > Greedy Lying Bastards (2013) Discussion > Good review by by Rod McLaughlin

Good review by by Rod McLaughlin


A review of Craig Rosebraugh’s documentary “Greedy Lying Bastards” http://wattsupwiththat.com/2013/03/09/a-review-of-craig-rosebraughs-do cumentary-greedy-lying-bastards/

Left-wing American documentaries, like this one, or Michael Moore’s, or one I saw about the evils of Walmart, tend to insult the viewer by bombarding her with one side of the story, and words like “lying”, “greedy” and “bastards”. Watching Rosebraugh’s movie, every time the narrator said that there is lying and greed on the skeptic side of the debate, I wondered whether he’d consider if these vices occur among the promoters of climate change “theory”. He did not.

Unflattering shots of one’s opponents, selective information about funding, tear-jerking anecdotes about sea level rise, and shots of hurricanes and fires, with no statistical analysis to show if these events really did increase during the 20th century. All this Rosebraugh learned from Michael Moore, who has been criticized for “dumbing down the left”. Rosebraugh does the same with environmentalism.


Four More Years! Ha ha ha ha ha ha

reply

Extensive background on Eco-Fascist Craig Rosebraugh.

http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2013/03/greedy-lying-bastards.ph p

There is a new film out, a purported documentary on the environment, called “Greedy Lying Bastards.” Surprisingly, it isn’t about Al Gore. Nor is it about “green energy” executives who parlay connections with the Obama administration into millions of dollars, leaving taxpayers with the tab. And scientists who collect billions in government subsidies while fudging data to make a bogus case for more government power–what a coincidence!–don’t figure in it, either.

No, “Greedy Lying Bastards” is yet another attack on “climate change deniers.” Of course, there isn’t actually any such thing as deniers of climate change: everyone knows that the Earth’s climate has always changed, and always will change until the end of time. The question is whether there is anything that humans have done, or can do, to significantly influence the climate; the answer, I think it is clear, is no.

reply

I wonder which oil mogul paid Mr. McLaughlin to write this nonsense.

"I wondered whether he’d consider if these vices occur among the promoters of climate change “theory”. He did not.


Of course he did not, because that claim is absolutely ridiculous. This is the right-wing misinformation machine's strategy, muddy the waters by accusing the other side of doing exactly what they do. It really is a great distraction and it seems to work on people who have not seen the overwhelming scientific data proving man-made climate change is real. But those of us who have actually read the research, instead of reading what some paid shill wrote about said research, know what's really going on. Real scientists care about the future of our planet, and they get paid a fraction of what the oil company funded "scientists" make. If they really cared more about the money, they'd throw out all their research, become a denier and cash in a fat check from Charles Koch.

reply

"Real scientists care about the future of our planet"

Saving the planet is a religious mission that started 40 years ago. Global warming is just the latest fabricated crisis.

If you were a real scientist, you would be with the skeptics who have won. WUWT carries more science that any Greenie site, and keeps winning bloggies and changing minds.

Four More Years! Ha ha ha ha ha ha

reply

"But those of us who have actually read the research"

Oh, PLEASE. If you gave two *beep* about doing research or applied heavy skepticism to information that's been bought and paid for hby special interests, you wouldn't be here spouting apologetics for an anti-science agitprop made by de facto ecoterrorist sociopaths.

reply

Read the comments. The "peer reviewed" Marcott paper with new hockey shtick was shown to be junk science by Steve McIntyre at climateaudit.org

Peter Foster: Inglorious ­Warmists http://opinion.financialpost.com/2013/03/19/peter-foster-inglorious-%C 2%ADwarmists/

What this tedious film, and its hysterical title, confirm is the frustration from the left that their climate crusade — which was always rooted in hatred and demonization of industrial society — has inevitably crashed. That frustration is also evident in the frenetic campaign against the Keystone XL pipeline.

The movie may break some sort of record for one-sidedness (although its dweebie creator, Craig Scott Rosebraugh, gives us plenty of opportunity to see him phoning for interviews — Michael Moore-style — with the Koch brothers and Exxon’s head, Rex Tillerson).

The movie’s case for the “settled” science is presented by Kevin Trenberth and Michael Mann, prominent figures both in the warmist community and in the Climategate email scandal, which is ritually dismissed as out-of-context “cherrypicking.” You know, cherrypicking the embarrassing bits about lying, cheating and suppressing or destroying inconvenient communications.

reply