Axed! Thank God.


I think the subject says it all.

reply

Actually Cinemax will continue it....

reply

If the article in TVWise is correct: "I am now being told that, while moving the series forward in its current format is not possible due to the nature of the co-production agreement with the BBC, the network is looking to move forward with the story of Sam Hunter in some manner."

So, Cinemax may be continuing it, but "not in its current format." I expect you'll see only American actors and locations in it and the story will be cut back sharply to reduce costs.

IOW, a shoddy product made even cheaper. Good luck with that.

reply

The show as it now exists is canceled. Cinemax is essentially rebooting it--maybe. There's no mention of Cinemax picking up Hunted on the official website, on Spotnitz's blog, or in the major U.S. entertainment trade publications. We have comments published in two entertainment blogs to go on here, and only one of those sites is even half-reliable (seeing as TVWise was telling us just recently, based on their 'inside sources', that BBC1 was sure to renew Hunted). Deadline's reliability has never been 100% either, but we can be sure nobody's making anything up--just possibly overstating how committed Cinemax is at this point. No new contracts have been signed, and probably there's a lot to be ironed out, and it is NOT a certainty by any means that Hunted will come back on Cinemax, which until a few weeks ago, was going to be producing a show with William Petersen, that is now basically dead in the water.

I strongly suspect that Cinemax just wants to avoid a cancellation notice here in the U.S., which might negatively impact the already horrible ratings for Hunted. We probably won't hear anything definitive from them until well after they've aired the last episode of this season.





reply

Well despite all the nagativity surrounding series of one of Hunted, I am actually enjoying watching it. Currently catching up with episode 2 off of my digi box. I am annoyed that it has been dropped by the BBC - they should give it more of a chance to shine than one series. But I guess that's all it takes these days - no show is safe.

The final episode of Hunted airs on BBC1 in the UK on Thursday 22nd November 2012 @ 9pm.

reply

The ratings were bad, the reviews were bad, fewer and fewer people were watching--why exactly do you think it would have helped to bring it back for another go?

These days, a show that has a bad first season is much MORE likely to get renewed--not less.

Go back a few decades and even major HITS on BBC only ran a few years, because they didn't believe in milking things dry.

reply

I don't understand why anyone thinks it should be given more of a chance. This isn't Firefly, it's not liked by the majority, it's not getting decent ratings. The argument that TV companies cancel things too quickly can only extend so far. It certainly doesn't extend to Hunted.

reply

It's not Firefly in the sense that unlike Firefly, there is no fanatical cult willing to do anything to try and bring it back--I had a guy offer to buy me the entire series on DVD, just to convince me I liked it, which I already knew I did not, and do not, and never will, even though I liked Buffy (the first few seasons), and am a fan of the space opera genre. The decent (hardly awe-inspiring) sales of the DVD set depended largely on a handful of people inflicting copies of it on their hapless friends and family members, and even on random strangers.

And after all that, they did a movie version, and it flopped.

Not a good omen for Hunted, which does not inspire anything close to the same level of devotion. But maybe that makes it MORE attractive to Cinemax. That kind of fanbase can be more trouble than it's worth.



reply

Cyclons- Do I know you? LMAO, You described what I did to a tee, except, out of 20 people I loaned or gave the dvd's to, only 2 people didn't like the show, even people who said they hate sci-fi ended up loving the show.

reply

Ah, I see the problem, you liked Buffy the Vampire Slayer. Firefly requires some level of maturity which most 12 year old girls just don't have.

reply

[deleted]

Personally, I'm sorry it's been axed as it was a pretty good show and alot worst junk goes on for years. Shows are axed now without really having a chance. It really deserved a second series to give it a chance to improve

reply

I agree with you - I'm not sure why people aren't tuning in. To be honest I don't think it got enough hype on the UK and whilst Melissa George appeared on Jonathan Ross it was quite late into the series. I've caught up with the episodes on iPlayer. Shame because there isn't a lot else like it on TV and I've really enjoyed it. George is in her element here and I really hope she gets the opportunity to reprise the character.

I actually really enjoyed the US remake of Prime Suspect too, and that got axed.

I think British audiences are addicted to reality-pap shows like I'm a Celebrity, Strictly Come Dancing and X-Factor, and genuinely engaging drama series are falling by the wayside.

It's too cerebral! We're trying to make a movie here, not a film!

reply

It's actually one of the better shows I've seen on the BBC for awhile. The money they waste on reality shows could be used for good dramas that we don't see anymore. I read that the BBC spent £22 million of the license fee on The Voice UK when they could have used that money for new series of Spooks, Waking the Dead, Hustle, Lark Rise to Candleford, etc, or new dramas instead of that reality show

reply

There's no end of scripted television to watch. More than anyone has TIME to watch. They can't keep every show on the air until you personally are tired of watching it.

Hunted has no redeeming social value whatsoever, it was badly reviewed, and its audience was declining so quickly that the only possible explanation is that most people who watched it didn't like it.

We all watch shows that are bad and we like them anyway.

This was one of yours.



reply

The show requires one to think a bit.. and that's a problem for mass appeal. I like the style and the acting is very good for the most part.. plus George is smokin hot..

To each his own..

reply

I would say that to enjoy Hunted you have to switch off your brain and admire the view. Otherwise you start thinking about all the plot holes, the offenses to realism, the endless use of cliches, and the god awful script. If you switch off your brain you can admire her pouty face, the chases, the guns and blood, etc. It's mindless crap, but to each their own...

reply

Calling Hunted "too cerebral" is like calling My Family "Too innovative". Hunted really is not cerebral. Only someone who found the "riddles" in The Da Vinci Code challenging, would think so.

But you know what? It really doesn't have to be cerebral in order to be compelling. There is plenty of compelling drama that isn't cerebral. This show could very well have found its audience if the protagonist had been more interesting (not the actor's fault) or the story had relied less on a body count that is getting ludicrous and more on character driven drama. And believable characters. Also, I could have done with less of the Inferred Abilities and Mary-Sueing.

So far Sam makes every mistake in the book, like, for example, lingering for ever over her friend's file instead of just grabbing it - to make sure there will be a line of Expendable Bad Guys politely waiting their turn to get beat up - she is constantly getting caught, being found out and drinking poison as if she failed Spying for Dummies. And _still_ all the other characters keep referring to her as "the best in the field" etc. It reads like bad Harry Potter fanfic, with spies instead of wizards.

Basically, the characters are not very well developed which in turn makes the body count meaningless. If you make human life cheap and people uninteresting and expendable, you remove all sense of urgency or peril. "Oh, there goes another red shirted crew man."

You can't replace compelling intrigue with ultra violence and you can't cover up undeveloped writing by applying blue filter. Ultra violence and blue filters are something you add once you already have a script worth filming.

The script is clumsy. It makes clumsy use of tired tropes (Tropes are not bad in themselves, it is all in the execution. And some tropes are overused and should be avoided until they feel fresh again. This script went for all of the most tired tropes like a pig to truffles.) and the execution is also clumsy. If this had been a web series made by semi amateurs, I would have been _deeply_ impressed but it isn't. There is no kinder way of saying it. I'm not blaming the actors (much) and in fact, I'm not blaming the writers either. There's a base note that could have become something but the original script should probably have been developed more (like, involving a couple of writers who have actually met humans to help develop the characters)

This is producer fail.

And, in case you are wondering, as people tend to, why I'm even here if I hated it - I didn't hate it. I just didn't like it much either. I'm here because I was hoping to find spoilers for the few things that I wish to know - like, who the blank faced man is - because if I can find that out here, I won't have to watch any more episodes. And that goes back to my contention. There is something here - a single character that could have developed to something interesting, or a plot point that I actually care about having cleared up - that says that this could have been good. But now it isn't.

I do hope that the Huntedverse gets a reboot but I don't think Sam Hunter is interesting enough to be its hub, she would need a MAJOR rewrite for that to work. As the character is now, it is nigh on "My Immortal"-worthy.

I can see it as a web series centering on some other character. With a couple new writers attached. And without the bluefilter.

reply

Great post--probably better than the show deserves.

It's not 100% sure that there'll be a reboot--there's going to be at least an attempt at one--but based on what Spotnitz is saying, it would have Sam Hunter as the central character--possibly none of the other characters will cross over with her--and they will dump the continuing storylines. How would that work? I have no idea. But maybe the idea is that since the majority of people who watch the show at all are 'timeshifting' it (and IMO, fast-forwarding their way through it), an episodic series that can be watched in pretty much any order you please makes more sense.

But it really doesn't make any sense to think that Spotnitz can make this work. He's never made ANYTHING work. You really have to hand it to the guy--he sucks at virtually everything that a showrunner has to do--except the politics. And that makes him a survivor. For now.




reply

"It's too cerebral! We're trying to make a movie here, not a film!" - that's my signature - it's on all my posts. It's from Bowfinger :D

Yes, Hunted has plotholes that you could drive buses through. For example I don't believe that there are no CCTV cameras outside the National Gallery, and considering the ridiculous amount of tourists around there all year round anyone waving a gun about would attract attention. But I quite enjoy the action scenes - they are real and performed by the actors themselves. I watch a lot of great TV: Homeland, Dexter to name a couple - and they are slick, original and definitely compelling. Hunted might not tick all those boxes but it has a slight cliched-hokiness that I really like. I'm looking forward to the final ep, finding out the big secret about why Sam is protected and who the blank-faced man really is. I understand WHY people don't like it and all your points are valid, but to those who actually like our little weekly slice of Hunted we'll miss it when it's gone.

It's too cerebral! We're trying to make a movie here, not a film!

reply

Perfectly fair. As I keep saying, anybody can enjoy a bad TV show, which is what this is, but so what?

So we don't usually get to enjoy them very long, that's so what.

reply

I don't have a problem with that post either, but the British television scene is apparently much different than the US one. There are certainly series that do not meet everyone's taste, but truly bad series, such as this one, are really quite rare. Secondly, many of the somewhat better series stay around for a long time. The Bill, for example, certainly had some very good episodes, but it also had some long stretches of mediocrity. It was broadcast for 26 years. Taggart, another police show, lasted 27 years, but was mostly better than The Bill. I could go on, but I think you get the point.

reply

I do, but I don't agree. British TV certainly has been better than American TV at some points in time, but at the present time, I just don't find any of it terribly compelling, and between BBC America, PBS, and other outlets, we get quite a lot of it, and generally the most popular stuff.

They aren't as different as they used to be, either--because they cross-influence each other, and the increasing number of channels and demand for entertainment means that audiences on both sides of the puddle see more and more of what the other side sees.

However, my favorite show of the moment, "Game of Thrones", could be called a collaborative U.S./UK effort.

I think you greatly underestimate just how good American TV has been at its best, and I just don't share your enthusiasm for much of the current UK product.

So we'll have to stick to agreeing about Hunted, which combines the WORST of both worlds, instead of the best.

reply

BBC dropped off Game of Thrones early on, I was mildly worried back when it happened. Thankfully HBO carried on and they got a great cast, many of which are from the UK and NI has worked out amazingly well for locations and filming in the Paint Hall.

Just bringing this up as I agree with you about much of what we get funneled from the BBC, but the BBC isn't necessarily good representation of what the UK or even GB has to offer.

reply

Taggart, another police show, lasted 27 years, but was mostly better than The Bill.


Yes, the British TV scene is different. For one thing, while Taggart did indeed last 27 years, how many actual episodes were made and shown?

Just over 100.

An average of 4 per year.

US shows typically run 22 episodes per season, these days. a US show that ran 27 years would have been almost 600 episodes.

Naturally the UK watchers didn't get tired of it, they only saw it an average of 4 times a year!

Let's at leat try to compare apples with apples, shall we?


reply

I'm going to miss the show every week. It's an interesting story - except maybe the Turner story has dragged abit - had and good actors. I'm sorry people didn't like it, but, alot did. I hope we get proper answers in the final episode. Melissa George said she saw the last scene and thought "Wow! You're not really doing that / or going there" (can't remember exactly) so I'm not hopeful for a good ending

reply

I'm sorry to say that you'll probably be disappointed. I imagine that episode was done with a second series in mind, so there may well be a lot of holes left open.

reply

Cme on mate whilst I argee with nearly all your post, the fact you came here hoping to read spoliers so you wouldnt have to watch the show lets you down. There's no way the people who wrote this show know what is going on, they are making it up as they go alone, im glad they have cancelled this-I was punishing myself watching this in the hope the story picked up or something meaty came up but obviously its not going to happen.

reply

I've just finished watching episode 2 on The Movie Network in Canada and I don't understand why it got low ratings in the UK. It's very interesting and I'm definitely hooked. Going to keep watching for sure!

reply

To each their own. Personally, I thought it was terrible. A word of warning: Don't expect too much from the final episode... they thought they were getting a second series, and of course, they didn't.

reply

I totally agree. I don´t live in England so I don´t know about the ratings, but I started watching and I got instantly hooked.
Granted some of the things were far fetched, but it has interesting characters, good acting all around, a good story in general, suspense.
I liked that it was dark and intense. Too bad it got axed and I hope to see Melissa George back on the screen soon.


"You really must be needing love...those cookies are from the Eisenhower administration"

reply

Loved this series, looking forward to season 2 even if itll be a different story at least the actress is staying

reply

bbc has renewed it, and has been confirmed for a 2nd season on the bbc also starring melissa so its not a reboot

reply

You are perfectly entitled to your opinion.
However, I liked this programme. Liked it a lot.
I wish there was going to be a 2nd series on BBC1.
Spooks it wasn't and I loved every inch of Spooks.
But Hunted had loads of oomph, good acting and interesting story.
I truly don't see much wrong with it.
Alas





reply

For the most part I liked it. Melissa George and that scottish bird aside I liked the action but then I also love anything to do with espionage.

I did cringe in the episode when the whole Illuminati-like tin foil hat conspiracy thing was revealed but they didn't go too far down that route. I'm also a bit pissed off we'll never get any answers to certain questions.

Bit gutted it has been axed but oh well.

reply

First off, to all those who've hated Hunted: who on Earth was holding a gun to your head? After the first half hour you should have twigged it wasn't up your street and so moved on. There are plenty of thrillers-by-numbers out there to watch.

In my view it was a great journey. Unfortunatley we're not there yet and the train's stuck in a tunnel. There are more questions now than there were at the beginning. And that ending was a bit Bunuel - I keep thinking back to Belle de jour...

reply

It's a shame it's not coming back but not entirely unexpected tbh. As others have said this certainly was no Spooks or even Waking the Dead. 8 episodes was far too long, should have and could easily have been trimmed to 6 weeks and the action pepped up just that little bit.

Also, and this is an ongoing fault of BBC, it's no good leaving an episode on the cliffhanger of what is going to happen to someone, only to trail next week's episode showing them fit and heathy and leaping around. This is a practise which the Beeb must kill NOW imho.

Again shame it's gone but wife, son and I all looked at each other at the end saying "Wtf was all that about ? Did anyone really care about any of the characters".

reply

sttarted of liking it but very quickly came to find it annoying and stupid glad my tv license pounds aint financing the next series of it to many stupid/dumb ass moments so much wasted potential and was it just me but did her fake american accent just vanish half way through

reply

Hunter was the Hunted and now the Hunt is over.

reply

Usually when an American writer comes to work for the BBC they tend to see it as a mark of honour, here the writer seemed to be slumming it!

Its that man again!!

reply

I'm sad that it has been canceled, it's not a bad show, but clearly it wasn't anything that the they were saying and what Spotnitz made us believe. The plot was very simple... Sam Hunter being hunted. But then things came to be completely different, like lost on the screenplay. The show should have been called BYZANTIUM instead. Bad for Melissa, who did a incredible job, but the story is very bad.

reply

Why did you write "it's not a bad show" and then write "the story is very bad".

If the story is very bad, and I completely agree with you that it is, why is it not then a bad show? I thought Melissa did a terrible job (just look at some of the threads here), so bad story + bad actress = bad show.

reply

What I meant was that the idea was interesting, but then the story was bad developed. Also, its technical qualities were good: great direction, edition and image quality, and no invasive soundtracks pushing you hard for the drama or any other situation... And for me those are enough qualities to call it "not bad show", and very relevant when you compare it to any other TV pattern like NBC or ABC's, even the way they edit the episodes seems the same in every single show, and the score seems just reused all the time.

For me Melissa still did an amazing job, the problem is that Spotnitz didn't developed the character as he should.

That's why TV shows need more than just great actors and technical qualities, they need a good story.

Hope I did my point of view clear now.

reply

That's why TV shows need more than just great actors and technical qualities, they need a good story.


It was a good story but the script, and imho also most of the actors. were not good enough. I think a good TV show above all need two things:
a. good script/good writers
b. really good actors



reply

I'm glad they were able to give it a proper ending. For that reason alone, I feel a sense of completion with this series.

reply

cmother1 said:-
Axed! Thank God.

Oh no, not again. Bugger.

reply

[deleted]

So people shouldn't criticise things they don't like? You do realise how stupid that sounds don't you?

reply

[deleted]

I agree. I really enjoy this series and think that it's only a few people who are bashing it who hate it so much but think there are many fans of this series and really happy that they are continuing it!

reply

It was cancelled because it was crap. I'm with the millions of others who turned off their TV sets.

Smithangela, you should realise that no-one has agreed to continue with Hunted. There is a possibility that a spin-off will be made. This wouldn't be a second series, and it's not confirmed yet either.

Also, could you tell spaccygirl, hi from me ;)

reply

[deleted]

Hey, troll, speaking of brains, why don't you understand what "cancelled" means?

reply

[deleted]

You are the retarded one because you are too dumb to understand what cancelled means. Clear now, dummy?

reply

[deleted]

Yes we get it, you're a troll. You're a bit late with your comments though. We've seen it all before. Hunted was cancelled, end of story. So having a go at people who criticise this show is like having a go at all the people who turned off their TV sets to this crap.

reply

Oh good grief Andrew Paquette ( and your other sock filmflamfilm) haven't you got over the dismal failure of your wee Harsh Realm comic yet? How many years has that been? Is it fifteen? And yet here you are hiding behind these jimthechin / filmflamfilm troll socks to attack the television programme of a man you hate just because he worked for a company that didn't launch you in to the enormous Hollywood career you thought you'd have.

Oh well keep dreaming Andrew, may be one day you'll finally taste success. And happy New Year!

reply

Who is Andrew Paquette? What is Harsh Realm? Who am i supposed to hate, and what company is he supposed to work for? You seem to have me confused with someone else.

You are claiming I'm a "sock". If you think this is true, report me to IMDB and let them check my IP. This is the only account I have. You're also claiming I'm a failed writer. I find this defamatory and the very definition of libel.

This has been going on for months. It's persistent trolling and defamation. My patience has run out.

reply

Hunted required no brain activity whatsoever. It was poorly written, juvenile crap for 14 year olds who've played one too many video games.

reply

Anyone with half a brain cell could see through the million plot holes and sorry excuse for a story in this lame show.

reply

[deleted]

Hello troll, don't let the door hit you on the way out.

reply

[deleted]

You're right, you're not a troll, you're a clown. Trolls succeed at annoying people, but you're just making me laugh.

reply

[deleted]