Your analogy doesn't fit. If you are passing yourself off to the world as the real uncle of someone who is in fact not your uncle and the entire film is about your relationship which the whole world sees up to a certain point as uncle-nephew, then it is completely appropriate to depict the relationship as such until proven otherwise. If we knew from the film's beginning that you were merely a "kindly uncle" and not a real uncle, that would be different and I'm sure reviewers would acknowledge it as such.
That said, reviewers make real mistakes all the time. I've seen Ebert for example often mistakenly represent the relationships, saying someone is a boyfriend who is actually a husband or vice versa, or that someone is a sister-in-law who bears another relationship instead. You do have to recognize, as sloppy as it is on their part, that reviewers are for reasons that do baffle me often perhaps drifting off during some scenes they watch amid their overload of film-watching and getting some stuff wrong. But your chosen pique here is not such a case.
To the contrary, I was impressed that the reviewers held their tongues as well as they did in not spoiling the film (they too often do not). It is absolutely essential that a filmgoer enter the film taking their relationship precisely in the way they themselves present it to the world - and that is as siblings, not as an abstract "family of two" or anything else.
Personally, I learned long ago not to read reviews until after seeing a film, which does make for recognizing the prevalence of mistakes reviewers make - but at least those mistakes didn't spoil the film for me, that is, spoil my ability to enter the film and follow its revelations, its intentional misleads, etc., just as the director intended - and if the director was competent (along with screenplays and actors) in carrying out his intentions, then it will succeed in giving me the full emotional as well as sometimes intellectual experience that a reviewer should never pre-empt - unless it's a review intended for review by those who have already seen the film - which is how I view imdb board discussions.
reply
share