I don't agree at all--if you lost both your legs, do you think you'd feel very desirable, especially if you were a beautiful woman like Stephanie? I'm a nurse and had a patient just the other day who stared at his freshly amputated stump (covered by a dressing) and said, "This is so disgusting". My heart just broke for him. It changes your whole identity, especially how you see yourself as a sexual being...and she lost both legs. So I think it was important to show how gaining back her sexuality was part of Stephanie coming back to life. Think of how he found her in her apartment for the first time. Dirty, depressed, flat affect; she had pretty much given up already. And she was different to him and than the other girls he used for a quick screw--he was doing something for her too. He and Stephanie were really friends, as much as he could be. In his Neanderthal way, she really meant something to him--he just was incapable of showing it emotionally very much. Look how he treated his son and sister...he couldn't show any emotion except anger. That's why it was also important to show that the accident at the end jolted him into realizing that he loved and needed her, and it was implied he was able to be a better father. He didn't just run every time the going got tough as he had before.
reply
share