When big productions have tiny roles for actors (walk-ons, featured extras, under-fives, one-liners, etc.), the director often just glosses over what is expected of the character and the actor usually has to do the bit part in one or two takes. It's really hard to imbue any sort of "character" into a bit part because of the lack of time and space (in the story, that is, not actual physical space) to develop any sort of characterization or humanity in the part.
Film shorts are sort of like that, too. Because the scenes are so limited, it's really hard to develop a character arc, so even very good actors can come off as wooden and stiff or over-the-top. Budgets tend to be smaller so there's not the luxury of doing multiple takes and then editing together the best parts of each scene. Rehearsal time is probably very limited as well - lines of dialogue just don't flow as easily when the actors haven't had enough time to work out the timing.
I saw all three sets of webisodes and thought the acting was good, considering the limitations they worked with. There were spots where some of the acting was overwrought or unnatural or where a lack of rehearsal showed, but all in all, I thought they all did a good job.
neat . . . sweet . . . petite
reply
share