My interpretation


The ending of this film left you guessing as to what happened, My thoughts were that he did drown and perhaps it was the hand or god reaching out to him,

reply

That never occurred to me, but then I'm an atheist. With the film's title in mind, I simply thought of the old saying, "Sometimes you have to lose everything in order to gain anything." But I'm sure that resonates with many people's religious beliefs, as well.

I expect you'll get a lot of argument in this thread, for and against your theory. I doubt anyone will win the argument. It just comes down to what each person believes.

reply

Well as the film was ending I think it left a lot of people wondering what happened and very puzzled,

Like you said everyone will have their own interpretation.

I don't mean to appear ignorant but what is "Spoiler"

reply

Actually, I like your interpretation. He seemed to sink too deep into the ocean to be rescued, then he saw a white light, he went to the light and a hand reached out for him.... it's all evocative of death and heavenly salvation. That interpretation didn't occur to me simply because I don't think about god(s) much. But I wouldn't be surprised if the filmmaker purposely filmed the ending that way to spark discussions like the one you and I are having.

The Spoiler button let's you hide plot-revealing text which other people might not want to read until after they've watched the film. They can choose to read the spoiler text, if they want, by hovering their mouse over the black bar. Just click the button and you'll see where to put the text that you want to hide.

reply

The ending in the DVD version seems to have been edited to be more upbeat. He is not under water as long, and the flash of white as he is pulled out is much shorter than in the theatrical version. I preferred the new ending.

reply

Well as the film was ending I think it left a lot of people wondering what happened and very puzzled,

Well actually no.
What was shown was what happened.
Another boat-something came, he saw the light, set his life raft on fire (fully by accident) to get their attention and they noticed (unnoticed by him, he gave up) and came to investigate and picked him up. End of story.

Of course you are free to interpret different things into that and make all those things a metaphor for something else.

But you know, sometimes a cookie is just a cookie.

---
Lincoln Lee: I lost a partner.
Peter Bishop: I lost a universe!

reply

So you think it was just a film showing the events that transpired between the sinking of a man's sailboat and his eventual rescue, nothing more? Why would somebody make a movie like that unless it were a docu-drama or otherwise based on a true story?

I'm atheist and never feel the need to apply a religious or supernatural meaning to anything in life, least of all a movie, but I thought the concept of this film was pretty clearly illustrated. This thing was pure allegory, in a very Christian way. You don't have to be religious or even tolerant of religion to see that.

Of course you are free to interpret...

reply

"Atheist". Nope, you're just a whiny little bitch. A real atheist does not bother mentioning it like that. You're just a wannabe little kid who thinks atheism = antitheism. A real atheist doesn't care either way. Consider yourself schooled, bitch.

Hama cheez ba-Beer behtar meshawad!

reply

You have it completely wrong. The ending is explained at the beginning of the film: he is rescued by a very small raft, and they also are lost at sea. A few days later they die, and they die earlier than planned because they rescuded him. This is why he keeps saying "I'm sorry".

reply

I can't remember exactly what was said in the beginning of the film but I know he said "All is lost".

What makes you so sure he was rescued by someone and that they died later.

reply

The film starts with the container floating in the ocean?? Then we skip back 8 days. He isn't rescued by a small boat? Not till the end anyway. He is reading from the journal he wrote when he thought all was lost, the one he burned to attract the ship. He was leaving a message for his family. Well, that's my take on it.

reply

great answer... 100%

reply

He is reading out the message that he put in that glass jar and dropped overboard from the raft.

reply

This.

reply

In the ending I saw, when he went to drown himself and the light etc appeared, there was very clearly a hand reaching out to him and the outline of a boat above him. So unless God uses a small boat then I think he was rescused.

reply

he was rescued.. yes..

reply

I also thought he was rescued. The reason I think this is that I thought we were inside of his head, and seeing his perspective, which was influenced by his state of mind.

So, even though we (the audience) saw a visual depiction of him sinking fast in the end (much faster than I would expect), I think he was just telling himself he was rapidly sinking with the raft on fire 25-50 feet above him. He had given up, having lost everything, and probably thought the boat in the distance didn't see him, just like he had been passed up before, by passing ships. Instead of that fast sinking, he was probably just below the surface and the search light from the small boat easily found him, he could see it, and someone reached down to him.

As a point of comparison in another part of the film, he caught a fish but a shark snagged the fish he caught before he could bring it on board. This startled him and he began staring into the water -- and he literally saw just one shark swim by. But the camera angle suddenly shifts and we are deep in the ocean looking up at the raft and we see dozens of sharks swimming around his raft. I think this is his mind imagining and exaggerating this threat of one shark. There may have been more than one, but I don't think all those sharks were reality. Just as the depth of his sinking was not reality.

At least that's how I interpreted those scenes.

reply

I thought the same thing, also, what were the 2 snapping or clicking type sounds you hear as the screen fades to black? I thought possibly it was the sound of 'flares' being set off, not sure though. Ending was definitely meant to keep us wondering, maybe there is a directors voice over version on a DVD version.

if there is an elephant in the room, I like to charge for rides

reply

When the raft was accidentally set afire, the light attracted the boat that rescued him. Someone on the boat reached out to him. He was saved.

reply

Yes, that's what we saw, but the way it was edited (fading to white) made me think it was actually him crossing to the other side, and the rescue part was after his death. How would the rescuer know exactly where he was? as the hand was already there, reaching down as he came to the surface, but it was night time, you wouldn't see someone under the water, the light from the fire would make it even harder to see under water. Seemed a little to perfect if you know what I mean. I think the director said it was left up to interpretation, hate it when they do that, I much prefer a definitive ending.

if there is an elephant in the room, I like to charge for rides

reply

The fire was still going strong. The people on the boat looked around with their flash light, saw the man's bubbles rising to the surface of the water, then saw him coming up, so they reached out their hand.

Now, how the man can still have air left in him, I don't know. If he did, how did he sink, I don't know. Anyone who knows how to swim would know that when the ocean is that still, there's no way he could sink at all with air in his body. I think it is more coincidental that this happened to conveniently point people to religious theories. I personally think it's a goof, like many other goofs in this movie.

Also I probably wouldn't reach my hand out right away for a human coming at me from deep of the dark ocean but maybe that's just me...

reply

I don't think the whole scene was a goof. Light above the water like the ambient light from the fire would not help you see below the water, it would inhibit it. Also, the churning of the water in the middle of the ocean at night would inhibit the ability to see bubbles surfacing, they wouldn't have known exactly where he was to navigate the boat to the exact spot, reach down and grab him as he surfaced, that's a million to one shot, I have experience with boats and they are hard to control to that kinda accuracy. I think the director was adding a false ending to the movie, where he actually died, but at the same time was rescued spiritually in the next life. Just a suggestion, I'm guessing, be interested in the directors thoughts, only he knows really.

if there is an elephant in the room, I like to charge for rides

reply

I think it's clear he died. The white light at the end...

reply

Exactly, that was the light and him reaching for god, that's how I see it......

reply

The ending of this film left you guessing as to what happened, My thoughts were that he did drown and perhaps it was the hand or god reaching out to him...

`````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````

I thought the same exact thing. Good ol' symbolism.

Decent movie but overrated. Grade: B-.

reply

Maybe he imagined all he saw on the ocean; the first ship, the second, which came so close, and the light in the sky which he tried to signal by lighting his water container on fire. And he didn't accidentally set his raft on fire. The water container was plastic; he had to know it was going to burn through and sink the raft. But he was desperate and knew he was doomed anyway if the light didn't find him. He'd already said in the note that he had a half day's ration and we know he had no water.

If he imagined both ships and the final light, then he did, indeed, die. If they were real, then I think he was rescued. It's ambiguous enough that the audience can write their own ending, should they choose.

reply

HE WAS JUST HALLUCINATING BEING RESCUED. I THINK THAT WAS PRETTY OBVIOUS. OR THERE WAS ACTUALLY A BOAT. HAND OF GOD? SURE, IF YOU'D LIKE.

IF YOU THINK ABOUT IT FOR A MOMENT, THERE COULD BE NO SMALL BOAT, BECAUSE WHERE DID IT SUDDENLY COME FROM? ALL THERE WAS AS FAR AS THE EYE COULD SEE WAS A SHIP AND THAT WAS MILES AWAY, SO WHERE DID A SMALL RESCUE BOAT APPEAR FROM?

HE HALLUCINATED THIS BECAUSE BASICALLY THE WHOLE SECOND HALF OF THE MOVIE HE IS THINKING ABOUT BEING RESCUED, OR HOPING FOR IT, SO IT WAS HIS LAST MIND FLASH BEFORE HE DIED.

AND ANOTHER THING, IF IT WAS GOD REACHING OUT TO HIM, WHY DOES GOD NEED A FLASHLIGHT? HAHA JUST KIDDING, BUT SERIOUSLY, WHY IS THIS A BIG DISCUSSION?

reply

I agree that he drowned and it was the bright light and the hand of god reaching out to him; also, I thought that perhaps his setting the raft on fire was not necessarily that he was trying to make himself visible to potential rescuers, but that it was kind of like what I have heard called a Viking funeral, because he knew he was going to die, thus the title “All is Lost.”

reply

As others have pointed out, the film seemed to have a spiritual eloquence to it that made it a little bit more engaging.

The idea of a man, late in life, being forced to slowly strip himself of material and physical possessions, until he is finally left with only his body. It is only then that he can be in touch with "the other side."


Limit of the Willing Suspension of Disbelief: directly proportional to its awesomeness.

reply