Clients feeling sick to their stomach after they notice temp changes in rooms, people being pushed down stairs, thrown to the floor, objects moving, objects missing, pets ending up dead under strange circumstances, people's marriages being destroyed by unexplained anger after moving into haunted homes, etc., etc.
Your sleep paralysis theory doesn't even cover 95% of what people are reporting to have occurred before contacting the team.
True, but all those experiences aren't the ones targeted to be explained by sleep paralysis.
The textbook sleep paralysis experiences described on the show (inability to move, perceiving figures approaching the bed or standing over you, creatures/figures interacting with you or putting pressure on your chest/throat, any hypnagogic/hypnapompic hallucinations really) can be explained by sleep paralysis.
Not everyone who suffers from a parasomnia is haunted. The clients of Dead Files are assumed to be, of course. That doesn't automatically mean that their textbook parasomnia experience should be attributed to their paranormal activity.
If a simple and straightforward explanation is available, why assign it to the haunting? That's a form of confirmation bias. It undermines the credibility. Why does it undermine the credibility? Because that one part of their joint paranormal experience that CAN be attributed to something much more common, is not addressed for what it is. They could have said something like: "after we moved onto this property, I started experiencing sleep paralysis, and I've never had that before we moved here". That would be an acknowledgment of a phenomenon that exists outside the paranormal (something many people out there can identify with, even), without invalidating any of the other experiences they have that CAN'T be explained.
Does that make sense?
Huh, signature? What's going on with that signature? This thing broken...?
reply
share