Opinions: which version is better?
[Potential SPOILERS Ahead]
I recently watched the 4.5 hour two-part international version at the NY Asian Film Festival - it was my first and only viewing of the film. For the most part I liked it. I thought the first part was really really good. Its exploration of the Seediq's religion, and the history of the formerly warring tribes, made the violence against the Japanese (especially Japanese civilians) very complicated and not at all glorious. The second part however did start to veer into jingoism and melodrama, as all the potentially sympathetic Japanese started turning bad and the Seediq's war becomes one purely of defense. Motivations for the characters' more extreme actions, although comprehensible, were difficult to sympathize with because of the way the movie unabashedly started glorifying almost everything that the Seediq do. It didn't exactly fall apart; I just felt like it didn't fulfill the promises of the first part.
So anyway, my question is, has anyone here seen BOTH version? If so, which do you prefer and why? Does the 2.5 hour U.S. version cut out exposition in favor of preserving the battle scenes, or does it actually cut out some of the fighting and long dramatic deaths of characters in order to preserve the complex story? I have a feeling it's the former, but I'd like to hear what you guys think. The 4.5 hour version gets exhausting towards the end - I'd kind of like to see something closer to 3.5 hours, but I still might pick the longer DVD release over the truncated one when they come out in August. Thoughts?
- Joe