MovieChat Forums > Would You Rather (2019) Discussion > Ugh....iris you stupid bitch.

Ugh....iris you stupid bitch.


I would've chosen both of us walking out of there with no hesitation. And then we'd both tell the whole world about the sick games that the lambrick family was doing.

You can ALWAYS find other options for yourself and your brother. the guy had THREE sisters waiting for him!!! you only had your brother you selfish bitch! ugh the ending made me soooo mad. and then she starts crying like she was forced to shoot him.

...Checking how many f#cks will be given today... Sorry, no f#cks will be given today.

reply

I'm so relieved I am not the only one on this board who wouldn't kill an innocent person no matter what. Kudos to you, Santana.



Intolerance of intolerance should be applauded.

reply

Don't you see? Iris was just LIKE YOU at the beginning of the game. She chose to rather electrocute herself than inflict pain on someone else. She CHANGED throughout the night and you know what? You might as well. It's easy for you to sit there in the comfort of your own home, nice and cozy in your computer chair, but you DON'T KNOW how you would react unless in that situation. Iris did NOT start out as a brutal murderer. Quite the opposite actually. She BECAME ONE, and to the OP, I believe if Iris had not killed the innocent guy, her brother would have still been alive. What goes around, comes around.

reply

But you would be killing an innocent person, you're brother. It wasn't a choice between money and Lucas's life, it was a choice between Lucas's life and her brother's life. So the real question is, would you rather kill your most beloved family member, or kill a nice guy you just met one hour ago?

reply

I'm not killing my brother. The host and the cancer is. And the question is, am I to play God and take another person's life or am I to see my brother's cancer as God's will. Maybe greater things await him in the afterlife?


False: all conservatives are stupid people;
True: most stupid people are conservative

reply

I think if you're contemplating WWJD after having just gone through what she did then you're as crazy as the Lambricks. "Why did God in his infinite wisdom choose to trap me in a hellish game of murder and suicide? Does heaven have no bowling alleys or pay-per view?"

reply

God didn't trap me in anything. My free will did.


False: all conservatives are stupid people;
True: most stupid people are conservative

reply

Why did God in his infinite wisdom choose to trap me in a hellish game of murder and suicide? Does heaven have no bowling alleys or pay-per view?"

Her choices put her there.

reply

I know family naturally comes first to pretty much all of us, however, you have to also feel quite guilty knowing that strings would be pulled to move your brother up to the top of the waiting list, thus putting others at risk of dying as well.

reply

If you would have chosen the walk free option, then he would need to make that choice as well, hence the "first one got advantage" instead of "first one decides everything". He would ahve shot you. congratulations, you just killed yourself.

---------------------------------------------
Applied Science? All science is applied. Eventually.

reply

My thoughts precisely
Also, what leverage would the sadistic game makers have on the remaining players? None.

reply

If you would have chosen the walk free option, then he would need to make that choice as well, hence the "first one got advantage" instead of "first one decides everything". He would ahve shot you. congratulations, you just killed yourself.


I would kill myself before killing an innocent person. I could never live with that guilt.

reply

Nah, realistically if both of the contestants chose "walk free" then the host and his mercenary staff would have executed them both. That's like leaving two loose ends unaccounted for, which you don't do if you're an evil mastermind. It's simple villainy 101 - so even though it was a dick move to shoot Lucas, the other option was essentially suicide (in this circumstance).


Now that I finished typing that, I think if I was in that situation and given the option to "shoot first" - I think I'd be pissed off enough to take the dueling pistol and try and use my one shot to kill the host. If the only "honorable" exit from the game is to be overwhelmed by mercenaries, than I at least want to make the head guy pay before I go.

________________________
"I...declare...BANKRUPTCYYYYYYY!!!"

reply

The host had never betrayed a promise before, there's no reason to think he would then. But, as others have pointed out, the other player also gets to choose to kill you and keep the money or walk away. That makes Iris' choice much harder.

reply

Lambick didn't promise they'd get to leave if Iris chose to. We can't be sure if Lucas would have been given the same two options, and I doubt he would have been.

__ __ __
Gentlemen, you can't fight in here! This is the War Room!"--Pres. Merkin Muffley

reply

no. one loose end is as bad as two. either they both choose to leave and perhaps they are allowed to or choose to kill the other person. you could not know if you will be allowed to leave or be killed. it just depends how honourable the host is

reply

They didn't kill Iris which disproves your assertion.

reply

That disproves nothing. Iris is now a murderer, so if she went to the police, she would also be confessing to her own crime, which she choose to do for money. The law would not protect someone who killed another when offered the opportunity to leave. She was not being forced to kill. If both of them choose not to kill, they would remain victims and therefore could go to the police without fear of repercussion, which Lambrick couldn't allow. So, therefore, Lambrick would have to kill them to prevent either one of them from exposing the crimes committed at this dinner. He would have no reason to kill Iris, because she is no longer merely a victim.

reply

She could probably plead temporary insanity, after the kind of night she had.

reply

I agree "TheMasterPlan"; I noticed that there was no gun on her at the time, so I thought she might shoot the host also. By shooting Lucas in the heart though, she did the right thing, really, because he died fast and also, if she had given up, then that would have meant that all the crap she already went thru would have been for nothing... and yes, they probably both would have been executed anyway. Good movie, but I knew how it was going to end; just KNEW it!! LOL

Poyzunus 1

reply

Um, no. What would have happened was Shep would have given the other guy the same option once Iris said no. I was rooting for Iris to shot the guy, not for the money, but for survival. Because, you can't trust the other guy to also take the freedom option.

reply

We don't dont that the second player is allowed to make a decision. The host did allow players to ask questions throughout the game. So I would ask him if the second players has to choose to leave as well and make my decision based on that.

reply

Lambrick said in the beginning of the round that the person who gets to go first has a "much better advantage"... I think Lucas would have been able to choose if Iris chose to walk away.

reply

> I would've chosen both of us walking out of there with no hesitation. And then we'd both tell the whole world about the sick games that the lambrick family was doing.

Yeah, like Lambrick would really let the two of you walk away empty handed. He'd have no power over you to keep you from going to the cops. I mean, he made you get stabbed and cut your eye. He has no hesitation in killing an 82-year old lady, he'll certainly have no problem killing both of you.

And remember, Mr. Lambrick said that this final round almost never went past the first question. That implies that if the first person chooses that they both go free with nothing, there is another question. Most likely, the second person is then given the exact same choice.

--
What Would Jesus Do For A Klondike Bar (WWJDFAKB)?

reply

I completely agree!

reply


I do wonder if the other player would have gotten the same chance after Iris would have turned down shooting him. By that time you have already went through so much and are SO close to the money, it would be hard for a lot of people to turn down, whether they freely admit it or not.


Haters gonna hate

reply

I think Lucas would have gotten the chance to chose. In the beginning of teh round, Lambirck says the person who goes first has a "much better advantage"

reply

Some of you people are really slow. You guys are wrong in thinking Lucas would get the same question (or any question) if she chose for them to walk. The host clearly said "You both walk and END THE GAME.. but with no money."

He said the game ends if she chose that option.
If she chose for them to both walk, the choice would require them to both walk free to be fulfilled.
Moving on to Lucas for another question would totally nullify her choice in two ways. The game didn't end and they both didn't walk.

reply

Lucas was fighting for her. if it wasnt for him she would have never made it that far in the game. He was so happy when she didnt drown. when she got stabbed he was there to hold her, and her wound. He introduced himself and told her all about the players in the game when she first came. Him and Cal. He made her feel so comfy when she could have felt ackward and gave her insight.He was the reason she almost ESCAPED! All he did, and that's how she repays him?!!! What if that was her and the tables were turned?! What if Iris brother didnt commit suicide and Lucas decided to shot her. Iris brother would have not only been left alone to really fend for himself but he would have never know what happened to her!Thats enough to drive someone insane. Did Iris ever think that Lucas sisters received that?!! How are they dealing with their brother never coming home and never knowing where he was at?!

reply