MovieChat Forums > The Angry Birds Movie (2016) Discussion > The elephant in the room: Is it a metaph...

The elephant in the room: Is it a metaphor for the refugee crisis?


Hello there.

First of all, i have not seen the movie, and i do not have any particular view on the immigration crisis of Europe as i do not live there.

However, i have heard that many people have said that this movie has lots of parallels with the german refugee crisis and its very critical about it. In your honest opinion, did you feel that this could be applied as such?

I know its just a animated movie, but i am actually curious if the parallels was so strong that people could not help to notice it or its just someone cooking on nails here?

reply

No. More like a microbe in the room.

reply

Instead of relying on what you heard maybe you should see the movie. That way you can make up your own mind about this movie and any metaphors it may contain.



Crazy is building your ark after the flood has already come.

reply

Didn't think of that at all but in retrospect it does run parallel to the immigration crisis in Europe. However though, I don't think they can really tell a story about pigs invading without something similar to that. Unless the pigs just went onto the attack right away.

reply

Thanks, thats all i wanted, a neutral opinion about it :)

reply

duden543 wrote:

Thanks, thats all i wanted, a neutral opinion about it :)


This film would then be saying that Muslim refugees are rapacious pigs. You think Rovio, Columbia Pictures, etc. would like that kind of controversy to cut into their profits?

reply

More parallels to the Euopean invasion of everywhere in the 16th-19th centuries.

reply

The elephant in the room: Is it a metaphor for the refugee crisis?


No.

reply

I haven't seen it yet, but from the trailers, the pigs come to the birds' home and make themselves look like good guys when they're not.

That to me seems more like the trope of when the swindlers comes to town. They promise good things, the townsfolk fall for it until it's nearly too late.

reply

The pigs doing the cowboy dance seems like a reference to Europeans taking over North America between 1492-1800. So, I guess there's a whole lot of ways this film's political message can be interpreted. May the loudest promoted view, with the most frothy-mouthed craziest fanbase "win" the "debate".

reply

Columbus landed in Central America and the Spaniards took over most of Central and South America. The Mexicans are the descendants of the conquistadors. About this movie, I don't think its about a specific event. It just shows why you need some angry birds to protect you from foreign invaders and why you can't just be nice to everyone.

reply

Yes, they created the game "Angry Birds" as a metaphor representing the peaceful, freedom-loving Christian pig nation and the angry invaders "refugees" (the birds) who destroy and terrorize the pigs (Americans/white people). Then they made a movie about it.

--
^Signature is below here
Americans have the right to burn the flag. πŸ”₯πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈπŸ”₯

reply

There are a number of things that do evoke Islam and the USA. The color of the pigs and Islam is green, the head pig has an Islamic beard (under chin). Note that Muslims would hardly like to be represented by pigs. The symbol of the birds is an American eagle, but it's gotten soft and flaccid and taking action is "up to the people". The visitors (from across the waters) also come with and eventually use explosives, and the birds retaliate against the visitors' island.

There are differences, the main one being that technology is associated with the aliens, not the locals, and the pigs' island is more civilized while the birds' is more rustic.

For the record, I found the movie to be long and tedious.

There's no way the producers of the film would be unaware of the parallels. It's quite a mind job to do on children. I've seen a number of feature-length cartoons with my goddaughter and you'd have to be extremely naive to think that they're devoid of propaganda and social engineering.

reply

This is so obvious to any European watcher. Also, it's obvious since they changed so many things from the original game: these changes are not pure coincidence. There were no bearded pigs in the game. The (green!) pigs were not invading. Why the addition if not for symbolism? What about the (American) eagle? And the village population who accuses Red of being angry because he's asking basic questions that no one else dares to ask...

What is funny is that it's not even supposed to be very cleverly suggested, but even with that level of obvious message, so many people deny there is a message there, which makes it a bit clever, at least for a naive adult audience.

I love a movie with many levels. A level for kids, a level for adults who get more jokes but are naive, and a level for people who get the message.

reply