MovieChat Forums > Love and Honor (2013) Discussion > Doesnt quite look like the 1960s

Doesnt quite look like the 1960s


Is it like whenever Hollywood is making a movie set in the 1960s aimed at a teen audience, it still looks like the modern day (as in anytime between the late 90s and 2013), in terms of styling? X Men First Class also had this problem.

I may not have been alive in the 60s, but other modern shows and movies set in that period at least go for authenticity and are a good indicator for what it must have been like. Mad Men certainly submerses you into the 60s feel with intricate details and even the new Star Trek 'reboot', in order to maintain continuity with the original TV show, still has a late 60s feel in terms of styling.

Based on the trailer, the only obvious thing that says that Love and Honor is in the 60s is the Vietnam war reference. Maybe the movie is better.

http://www.1971-reviewae.com One Nine Seven One

reply

well since Vietnam war ended in 1975 it could be set in the early 70's maybe?















reply

well since Vietnam war ended in 1975 it could be set in the early 70's maybe?


The war ended in 1975, but 99% of American troops were removed by 1973. 1975 is when the South Vietnamese army collapsed when we left them on their own to fight the North.

Either way, the OP is right. Not even CLOSE to any time frame of the 1970s. It is utterly ridiculous.


Dr. Kila Marr was right. Kill the Crystalline Entity.

reply

[deleted]

We know exactly when it is: the moon landing, July 1969.

_________

Boba Fett survived the Sarlaac Pit and married a woman named Smur.

reply

The movie is set in 1969. During the time of moon landing.

reply

I agree, the trailer looked like it was set in modern times, it didn't have a '60s/'70s feel at all. Particularly the colour photograph he has--I know they had colour photos then, but this one looked so clear; practically difital!

reply

Growing up in the 1960's I'm often accused by my kids of being way too critical pointing out inaccuracies in movies set in that time period.
I haven't seen this movie yet but another poster said it was set in 1969 and that looks like a 1969 Mustang they are driving in the trailer. (All us teenagers drove around in brand new cars in the '60's LOL)
Anyway, the thing that stood out to me was the guy in the Che t-shirt. Che had only been dead a year or so and I'm quite sure he hadn't made it to t-shirt status yet. Personally, in 1969 I wouldn't have had a clue who he was.
Plus, if anyone does a search of photographs taken in the 1960's, student protests, Woodstock, concerts etc. it's very doubtful you will see anybody wearing printed t shirts. Tie died maybe, printed no. I don't think concert t-shirts were even sold until the 1970's. The only printed t-shirts I can remember were ones with school logos on them.
Anyway, as usual I'm sure I'll pick it apart more when I actually watch it.

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

I was seriously expecting at any moment for there to be a scene set in a Starbucks or for one of them to pull out an iPhone. It looks like what teenagers THINK the 60s/early 70s was like.

reply

I couldnt agree more, Im watching it right now and it looks completely modern. I didnt even know it was supposed to be set in the 60s until I saw the Vietnam Protestors. They tried to add the word groovy in the dialogue, but very few things in this movie make it believable as a 60/70s era movie.

reply

I also agree it didn't feel like the 60's at all.

I believe it was supposed to be 1969 to be exact because they was plenty of talk about the first moon land which we all know took place in 69.


I also felt much of the dialog and mannerisms were to "modern".

It became a typical millennial movie lots of pretty faces, average acting and so-so story telling.



and that's my opinion not fact.

reply

About the modern dialogue, the "go f#ck yourself" line really threw me off. Did they say that in the late '60s?

"What world are you living in? I don't need friends. I need fans."

reply

yes those expressions have been around for a while

reply

[deleted]

I grew up in Ann Arbor, and knew the areas shown very well. I think this movie did as well or better that any I have seen that try to recreate it. It is hard to fix the lamp poles and street signs to look that old, but otherwise it worked — including the street festival with papier mache costumes, which happens every year in this town in mid July.

reply

I didn't notice these issues per se while watching the movie.

But in retrospect and comparing it with another movie set in that very same period - "A Walk on the Moon" in upstate NY around the Woodstock area and including a scene AT Woodstock - then perhaps there is some basis to the criticism. OTOH - I have also recently rewatched the documentary "Woodstock" and what really stands out now is how poor the actual video technology was back in 1969 compared to now.

My phone makes clearer videos now that very high end ($$$) video equipment did in '69. ;-)

reply