Ruin it for me.


Since I know I'll never be near a theater playing the movie, can someone tell me the entire plot, including why the parents are so stupid?

reply

Obviously, this post has major spoilers.

SPOILERS SPOILERS SPOILERS IM SPOILING THE WHOLE FILM YOUVE BEEN WARNED

Basically, the guy impersonating their son was a 23-year-old from France, Frederic Bourdin, who had a history of stealing identities and passing himself off as other people, usually children so that he could have access to children's homes and orphanages and such. You find out at the end of the film that this man was wanted by INTERPOL for years for doing this dozens of times in dozens of countries in Europe.

In the beginning of the story, Frederic is found in a phone booth in Spain by police (who he himself called from the phone booth, pretending to be a tourist who found him) and taken to a children's home. He talks about how he knew how to act like a child and acted scared and so on and so on. In the children's home, no one can get a name off of him so they threaten to have him arrested/thrown out if he cant prove who he is. He says he's American and he was kidnapped and he convinces the heads of the home to let him "contact his family" on his own. Using the time they give him to do so, he calls different police departments in the U.S. asking about missing children, pretending to be the head of the children's home. He finally finds a missing child that sounds like he could fit (missing for a few years, about 17 now, etc). He has the department fax him a black and white picture and decides he looks enough like the kid to impersonate him, since he would be older and there's a lot of change in people between 14 and 17. He tells the department this is, indeed, the kid they've found in Spain. Then he contacts Nicholas Barclay's family, pretending to be the head of the children's home and tells Nicholas' sister that they've found her brother but he doesnt want to speak to anyone because he's very scared and doesnt seem to remember much.

A few days later, Frederic sees a full-color picture of Nicholas and freaks out because he has dark hair and eyes and Nicholas is blonde and blue-eyed. He begins to panic and thinks he wont be able to pull it off, which is right when he gets the news that Nicholas' sister is going to come to Spain to pick him up and bring him back to the U.S. He buys hair dye and colors his hair blonde, and gets an amateur tattoo artist living in the home to replicate Nicholas' few small tattoos. When the sister arrives he figures there's no escaping now and goes to meet her. He wears a hat, sunglasses, and covers the bottom half of his face with a scarf. The sister tells him she remembers his nose, and that it's his uncle's nose. He says she seemed so eager for it to be her brother that she believed it was even though he looked nothing like him. He doesnt speak much to her because he has a thick French accent, and she thinks he's traumatized because he cant remember anything and wont speak. She shows him a bunch of pictures, pointing things out and telling him about family members, trying to get him to remember. A government official in Spain tests him to see whether he really is Nicholas by showing him what happen to be several of those same pictures, so he passes that test based on pure luck. They send him to the U.S. and grant him U.S. citizenship because his own sister believes he is Nicholas, he speaks good English, and he knows who the family members are in the pictures and seems to remember the events of them, so they cant see a reason why they shouldnt grant him citizenship.

He gets to Texas where Nicholas' family lives and somehow, they too believe he is Nicholas. Even Frederic acknowledges that he's astounded that they believe him. The only person that seems skeptical is Nicholas' half-brother that lives across town, who Frederic says looks at him like he knows he is not Nicholas but doesnt say anything to any of the rest of the family. Frederic goes to high school as Nicholas and begins to acclimate to his new life, excited about having a fresh start and an opportunity to live a real childhood, which he says he never got. A woman who works for the FBI in kidnapping/missing persons wants to interview Nicholas because it's so rare that a child is found in this sort of case and they want to know what happened to him during the three years he was missing, how he was taken and how he escaped and where he was. She says that when she asked the family to interview Nicholas, on separate occasions the sister flat-out refused and the mother told her she couldnt make her bring Nicholas in and laid on the floor in protest. Both the mother and the sister claim to not remember doing this. Eventually she does end up interviewing him and he tells a tale of extreme abuse, how he was kept in a sex ring in Europe and was moved every couple of weeks, never knowing where he was. He says they had a solution that changed his eye color and beat his face every day so he'd be unrecognizable, and would torture all of the boys if they ever spoke English. He also claims he was raped on a regular basis and other specific details of the trauma he suffered. The agent says she believed him because he was so detailed and she couldnt believe anyone could be that good of an actor, that normal people cant just make up that kind of thing. He also had lots of cigarette burns and other scars consistent with the level of beating he described. The FBI begins an investigation into the sex ring. Contrary to the FBI's wishes, Frederic goes public with his story as Nicholas, giving an in-depth TV interview, which he says he did to make his version of Nicholas even more "real".

A Dallas lawyer (I think he was a lawyer... this is where the details get a little fuzzy for me), Charlie Parker, sees the interview while eating in a diner and feels there's something fishy about it, because the man in the interview doesnt look 17 and has a dark beard and dark eyes and always wears a hat and sunglasses. In the booth hes sitting in, there happens to be an old reward poster for Nicholas Barclay, and he looks at it as he's watching the interview and decides it absolutely cannot be the same kid. He says he learned somewhere that the one thing people cant change about themselves, and that never changes with puberty, is the shape of their ears. He pulls up a screenshot of the Nicholas interview and compares it to the Nicholas reward poster, zoomed in on the ears. Frederic has detached earlobes while Nicholas has attached ones, and Parker decides that's good enough proof that it's absolutely not Nicholas Barclay onscreen. He asks to have lunch with "Nicholas" and after talking for a while Frederic admits that they both know he is not Nicholas Barclay. Frederic says the family is so eager to accept him as Nicholas and he recounts how pushy the sister was in Spain, trying to force him to remember, remember, remember people and places and things. He tells Parker that he believes the family had a hand in Nicholas' death, and that's why they have turned a blind eye to the fact that he looks nothing like and is obviously not Nicholas. Parker considers this and begins interviewing neighbors of the Barclays, who say that there was a lot of abuse in the household and they would always hear yelling and screaming coming from the house. The neighbors also say Nicholas ran away several times and was actually somewhat of a violent and misbehaving child, contrary to the little angel the Barclays have painted for the press. Charlie Parker begins to believe that Nicholas' half-brother (whose name I cant remember, forgive me), who seemed to know Frederic was not Nicholas but accepted it anyway, actually killed Nicholas, and that his mother knew about it and helped hide the body. He goes to the half-brother's house and talks to him, and the half-brother turns up dead a few days later of an apparent suicide/drug overdose.

While this is going on, the FBI agent has also realized Frederic is full of it. She has him fingerprinted and they find the match for Frederic Bourdin, wanted by INTERPOL. He is arrested and sentenced to 6 years in jail. A case is opened against Nicholas' family, accusing them of hiding knowledge about Nicholas' death. The person who lives in the half-brother's old house agrees to let Charlie Parker dig in his backyard, where he believes Nicholas' body is buried. The guy living in the house says his dog always used to dig in one spot in the back corner under a large bush, and he looked back there and saw a piece of blue tarp but couldnt pull it up without breaking pieces off, and so forgot about it and left it alone. Parker is shown digging, but does not find the blue tarp the guy spoke of, or anything else. The epilogue states that Bourdin served his 6 years, still trying to impersonate missing children using the phone in his cell, and that he now has a wife and two or three children. The case against the Barclay family is closed due to lack of evidence, and they point out that no one should believe a word that comes out of Bourdin's mouth, but Bourdin swears he knows they killed Nicholas and he still believes it.

reply

Very good summary. Just two points of correction/clarification:

1. It wasn't the FBI interview that the sister/mother refused. It was having DNA testing done. This was after Bourdin had interviewed with a forensics doctor who told the FBI lady that there was no way a person raised in an English speaking household for that many years would now be unable to speak English without an accent, even if he hadn't been allowed to speak English for years. So the FBI lady flat out tells the sister this, yet she and the mother continue to act like they believe he's Nicolas.

2. Charlie Parker was a private investigator. No one hired him for this particular case though. He just became intrigued.

The film leaves it ambiguous. On the one hand, you can kind of see how a family would so desperately want to believe that Nicolas, who they thought was dead, has been found alive. Why would someone lie about that? So perhaps they were just blinded by what they wanted to believe.

On the other hand, it seems impossible that NO ONE questioned whether or not he was really Nicolas. The most telling point is that his eyes were a completely different color, and from what we know based on the film, Bourdin didn't even attempt to explain this until the FBI interview.

reply

Thanks for the corrections, I tried my best but it had been a few days since I saw it and a couple of details had slipped away. I'm surprised I did as well as I did.

reply

I just watched this tonight and was reading up on it. He did, in fact, have an explanation for his eyes being brown. Remember, he told his older sister that the men who had abducted him performed experiments on him. They poked his eyeballs with needles and injected solutions to his eyes, which in turn made them from blue to brown.


I don't even know if there IS such a thing as changing one's eye color with an injection, but that's what the guy said.

reply

Eyes can and are tattooed, but tattooing the iris convincingly I've not seen.

Indeed, something is very fishy and highly questionable about the family. There are too many issues in real life that would prevent such an impersonation from being successfully pulled off. Something is wrong with that family.

No two eyes are alike but there are many things that would have told the family this wasn't their son. Additionally, the glasses and the hat always on would have told the parents something is not right here and that the guy is a phony because he's hiding his appearance plus, as was said, there's no way he would have lost his ability to speak English as before. Plus, can you imagine a mother not knowing whether her son had attached or detached ear lobes? Don't mothers know their sons faces better than that?

Here's a link to examine of some tattooed eyes, but I saw nothing that would suggest changing the color of the iris to a believable color would be possible.

http://images.search.yahoo.com/search/images;_ylt=AwrB8o5XoFpURgsAltKJzbkF;_ylu=X3oDMTBsZ29xY3ZzBHNlYwNzZWFyY2gEc2xrA2J1dHRvbg--;_ylc=X1MDOTYwNjI4NTcEX3IDMgRiY2sDOHZybTI2aDlwdWJiaSUyNmIlM0Q0JTI2ZCUzREwuZll5WmxwWUVMdTY2bzk3UHYwOFEtLSUyNnMlM0Q4ZSUyNmklM0RBbjhnOEQudlpNY3piWWNzTlVsMgRmcgNjcm1hcwRncHJpZANCSmltcjlqS1NldVhFamhvdTVmT09BBG10ZXN0aWQDbnVsbARuX3N1Z2cDMQRvcmlnaW4DaW1hZ2VzLnNlYXJjaC55YWhvby5jb20EcG9zAzAEcHFzdHIDBHBxc3RybAMEcXN0cmwDMTYEcXVlcnkDdGF0b29pbmcgb2YgZXllcwR0X3N0bXADMTQxNTIyNTI2NgR2dGVzdGlkA0kyMjQ-?gprid=BJimr9jKSeuXEjhou5fOOA&pvid=EgZlMTY5LjGP7sI0U58tcgiLNzYuNgAAAADZGCJV&p=tatooing+of+eyes&fr=crmas&fr2=sb-top-images.search.yahoo.com&ei=UTF-8&n=60&x=wrt&y=Search

reply

Just to clarify Charlie Parker's role - he worked as an investigator for the tv show Hard Copy and was present in the home while the interview was being conducted. The camera's monitor happened to be right next to an old photo of Nicholas and he noticed the difference in their ears. He pocketed the photo for later comparison.

I don't recall Frederic admitting anything to Charlie but I could have missed it when I got up to stretch - my local screening room has these horrible conference chairs. Great film though.

reply

[deleted]

There was a scene later in the film where Charlie says that he took Frederic to a diner and asked him who he was and Frederic admitted who he was and that he was wanted by Interpol. Parker thought that this meant he must be some kind of master criminal "what has he DONE?" but obviously later learned that he was just a serial fraudster.

I used to want to change the world. Now I just want to leave the room with a little dignity.

reply

I wanna correct you!!! Actually Charlie says, "You made your mother mad" to Bourdin. And Bourdin says "You know shes not my mother", that sentence was a solid proof that charlie was right!!!

reply

Great summery! Thanks!

reply

Hey, Thanks a million, I don't think I could watch this cause it's just too mean of a thing to do to somebody. But I am very grateful to have read your summary. It's a very interesting story or case . I just would have been really pissed after watching it. Im glad I know about this case but glad I didn't watch it if that makes any sense. But I do not want anyone to keep from watching it just because I couldn't. Stories like this just get me so stressed It is better for me not to watch.
I wish I was made differently. But hey,what can I say. I am what I am and that ain't no popeye the sailor man.

reply

Yes what Bourdin did was truly dreadful, and the guy has some serious metal issues but who wouldn't after the childhood he had. After his six year prison sentence he was deported back to France where shortly after he was caught trying to impersonate a missing fourteen year old boy (at this time he would've been 28-29 years old). Just shows you how screwed up the guy is. He is married with three children of his own now...I'd love to be a fly on that wall for an afternoon.

But...

I think the family are guilty as Hell. Although I don't believe the mother or sister killed Nicholas, I do believe they know who did it. The whole family were lying through their teeth. Bourdin even stated the sister was appearing to coach him before they spoke to the authorities.

Yeah. Guilty as sin.

-----------------------------------------------
"...and don't point your fooking tenticles at me!"

reply

Indeed, I have 0 sympathy for the family. Their behavior was erratic and odd from the moment he appeared into their lives.

While, perhaps some of the family members were not involved in the nefarious scheme there are too many unanswered questions. No way in heck does a mother not recognize her child. A deaf/blind mother could still recognize her freaking boy.

reply

What was the story on the death of Nicholas? How and why do they think the family killed him?

reply

I 100% agree with you! You said it perfectly. I am the same way with movies & documentaries that present you with such detailed information that you become so entranced and immersed into the film. I get suckered in and at the end I feel annoyed. But you said it better. It is stressful and certainly brings on anxiety in me. I am a sensitive person so I stay away from movies that are, well for lack of a better term - depressing.

reply

Great summary. I didn't really feel like watching this movie but the story intrigued me and was curious what happened lol.

So thanks! =p

reply

Nice summary, thanks.

And thanks to the other person who added on the corrections.

reply

Not even a thankyou from the OP?


...then whoa, differences...

reply

Completely fascinating article about the case...

http://m.newyorker.com/reporting/2008/08/11/080811fa_fact_grann?currentPage=all

reply

[deleted]

Wow not even kidding _ that was an an amazing write up! Thanks for the link; That article reads like a short story or Hemingway.

(Fair warning to anyone else, it IS quite a bit lengthier than I was prepared for, so make sure you have time for a good sit down read. I was on a ting tablet screen that kept switching orientation on me. Not ideal, but once I started I just couldn't put it down so I dealt with it in the interest of muddling through the gripping tale. Better off making sure you're comfy before you start that one.)

Truth is stranger than fiction, it seems, or at least on par with some of the best of it anyway....

Fascinating, indeed.

reply

How come the family didn't notice difference in eye color is what bothers me.

reply

They did notice... They knew he wasn't their kid.

However they had KILLED their kid so they were OK to accept somebody to replace him and hide the evidence even further however it just blew up in their face badly (Eventually).

reply