Stewart Copeland is brilliant. I don't think I've ever heard a decent musician say otherwise.
The greatest? I don't live in such places. Anyways, I'm also with you on the "Neil Peart is God" crap. I wouldn't be surprised it drives Peart crazy.
I like Rush, have owned most of their catalogue (up to the mid 80's anyway), and have seen them multiple times, most recently less than a year ago. Peart and Lee, no question, are basically the marquee 'frontmen' in the band, even though Lifeson functions very well as 'lead guitarist'. The thing about Rush that is both good and bad? It's all written. All the spots, note for note. Which is great, and their fans love it. I think the closest thing they ever get to true improv is possibly when Lee is singing, either the verse or chorus, but I'll call it 'the vamp'.
Make no mistake....they are highly competent, world class musicians. But? They are more like an orchestra, playing note for note every night.
Baker is from the improv school, particularly jazz. He's doing something different out there every night.
As far as Bonham and Moon? I think Baker stated it well. Bonham had solid 'technique', Moon not so much.
But Moon was fast and an electrifying performer, and like his friend Ringo Starr, was the perfect fit for his band.
I'll never forget the first time I truly noticed Baker. I had been a Zep fan from 9 years old on. I was familiar with "Moby Dick" and thought Bonham was 'bar none', the best. Somehow I got my hands on "Fresh Cream", probably 7-8 years after it came out. When I heard "Toad" I thought, "this guy did everything Bonham did, only earlier". And one other thing. Baker played next to Jack Bruce, a very unique and challenging musician. Jack Bruce is what I call an 'out player'. His muse is not the common muse. The fact Baker fit so well with him (in spite of what he says), is remarkable.
reply
share