MovieChat Forums > A Haunting in Salem (2011) Discussion > A note from the ugly actor...

A note from the ugly actor...


Hey guys,

It's Harry Potter's Dobby here (the lead actor in this film.) I want to apologize for a truly horrible performance. So many reviews have said that I was not believable as a hero sheriff with a handsome family. They're right! Hell, I didn't believe it myself! That's why I sucked. Here's my mea culpa on the whole thing if anyone cares to read it:http://www.billoberst.com/2012/01/goodbye-normal/ I knew I was wrong for the role and I took it anyway. I let down fans of the genre I love the most (horror.) I take full blame and I'm sorry.

A guy with my face might do a little better as an ugly President - I'll be kicking zombie ass in Asylum's "Abraham Lincoln Vs. Zombies" release date May 22. Here's a first look pic of me as Abe, kinda more my style: http://www.imdb.com/media/rm4140217856/nm2454994

I'm with Lincoln who said, when he was accused of being two-faced, "If I had two faces do you think I'd be wearing this one?"

Thanks for a second chance. I promise not to let you down again.

Bill

Bill Oberst Jr.
http://www.imdb.com/name/nm2454994/
Email link: [email protected]

reply


Dude, don't sweat shallow small hearted people. Do your thing and keep entertaining us. Can't wait to see your Lincoln movie!


"Spock is the shiz-nit!"

reply

Don't feel bad about it Bill, besides from what I hear the director isn't really too concerned with who gets picked for what role, he's not even too concerned with the acting either, he just throws a film together and that's it, so just keep doing your thing its not like the people who wrote those negative comments are gonna stop you.

reply

[deleted]

@gjieuh Good advice! I thank you for it and I'll take it to heart.

I don't take reviews personally (I thought the Dobby comparison was funny) but I did suck badly in this movie and am glad I was honest about that. The audience is my boss, so I always want to be straight-up with them. I know what I did wrong in this particular film and how not to do it again, so all good. I'm a better film actor for the experience.

appreciate your note very much,

Bill

Bill Oberst Jr.
http://www.billoberst.com

reply

Don't let other people's comments bring you down. If they don't have any constructive criticism to give, they're not entitled to say anything!

About the movie. The main thing that bothered me wasn't a single actor's performance. It was the overall performance from every single actor/actress. It was like watching a crowded one-man show. I didn't feel any feelings from one family member to another. I just felt that every actor played the lead in their own little world, not interacting with one another. I could sense that everyone just met and not like a real family sharing lives the past 20 years. I don't know who I am supposed to blame, actors or the director (I assume he has a finger in the pie)

Oh, I have to point out. The too short police pants, they did really bug me. I just had to say that too.

I do hope you'll land better roles than this. I haven't seen anything else with you but I know that this movie didn't show your acting talent. But I know you did better than what I would have done.

I hope you understand what I mean. =)

xo

reply

@AttilaBreaux You must be in the business to have that much insight. And don't get me started on the grandpa pants. They were up to nipples. My fault. I should have said something. I like the phrase "a crowded one-man show," by the way. You should write film reviews, if you don't already.

This is why I love IMDb message boards. Where else can an actor talk straight to viewers like this? Wonderful. Honesty is what cinema is supposed to be about, so I try to stay open to everyone's opinions and learn from them.

Great to hear from you!

Bill

Bill Oberst Jr.
http://www.imdb.com/name/nm2454994
http://www.billoberst.com

reply

[deleted]

Hey Bill,

Your honesty and sincerity really touched me, but you shouldn't take so much on your shoulders re: this film. Casting is ultimately the responsibility of the casting director, not the actors. It's the most natural thing in the world for an experienced actor to want to do something different. I recall Denzel Washington in "Training Day". I just couldn't accept him as a very evil bad guy because he was always cast as the hero/good guy, but it must have really been fun for him to do something soooo different than the usual. Lawrence Olivier appeared in some horrendously bad films, playing something other than Hamlet. I'm sure it must have occurred to him that he was just not right to play a French Canadian trapper, but he took the part anyway.

I grew up in rural America, and I've never seen a sheriff who looked "beautiful". If anyone in this film was miscast, it was the tall model type chick cast as the sheriff's wife. ....And the teens who were pretty enough but just couldn't act....

Bill, you have the satisfaction of knowing that you are a good actor who is regularly employed making major motion pictures, while the jerks who tormented you as a child are a bunch of pathetic drunken losers today. People who make vicious personal attacks via this faceless medium are less than pathetic, they are spineless. It's easy to sit in a bedroom in Mommy's basement and criticize others anonymously, but how would these people measure up, their appearance and accomplishments subjected to similar scrutiny?

reply

You're not ugly dude. I much preferred you as Abe than Benjamin Walker. Keep up the good work.

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

Dear Bill,

It's good to try new material and types of roles. It's good to be able to assess yourself critically - a lack of hubris! Finally, it's refreshing that you're not a typically Hollywood-type pretty boy. From an audience point of view: It can get tedious to be faced with conventional notions of beauty all of the time, both in their masculine and feminine forms.

The movie had much wrong with it, but I do think that all of the actors did a good job with what they were given to work with. Yes, I could sense that you weren't 'feeling it', as you stated. On the other hand, maybe if they had made the father/hero character with a distinct dark side (besides a mention of PTSD) instead of being two-dimensional 'nice guy saviour', then perhaps it would have been a more interesting and believable role and you would have been more inspired? Also - what the heck was costuming doing to you? No favours!

This is my first IMDB post, but I feel like you shouldn't be so hard on yourself! Although, I imagine that it's difficult to be kind to oneself in a tough, image-driven industry.

reply

@thebeadbird-536-875364 I appreciate your post and your honesty! I think you put your finger on the problem(s) inherent in an actor like me taking a role like that. Low Budget filmmaking has enough challenges without adding an actor who is self-conscious about playing a role to the mix! I learned a good lesson and the movie actually did well, so no permanent harm done. And yet I did let the audience down and I did feel the need to say so in a public post. I'm glad I did (the second that is, not the first :D )

You are right about this being an image-driven industry. Once one figures out how to match roles with image and screen presence, life as a camera actor gets a little easier, as it has lately been doing for me. There is much to be said for knowing one's type.

yours with appreciation,

Bill

Bill Oberst Jr.
http://www.imdb.com/name/nm2454994

reply

Hi Bill,

First, your willingness to admit that perhaps you weren't suited to the role is admirable, but I think you're taking on too much responsibility for the final product, which is the result of the efforts of all the actors and production staff. I'm just in the middle of watching it now and I'm not seeing any work from you that is making me roll my eyes or think that you can't act, as often happens with films produced by Asylum. (And I've seen many, I do love cheesy horror flicks. Though I confess that I don't know how a ghost that I think will end up being from the 1600's understands instant messaging. LOL)

Actually, I just passed the point where your character's wife was going to head to the hotel and I genuinely buy his irritation with the deputy and his concern for the family.

I haven't seen any of your other live action work and it may be true that your performances are stronger in more quirky roles, but we're all allowed to try new things once in a while and many actors have taken on roles that weren't entirely suitable.

I also think you're being overly critical of your appearance, though I admit that the hairstyle and pants probably weren't great choices on the part of the make up and wardrobe department. :)

I'm definitely going to check out Abraham Lincon vs. Zombies (Love Zombie movies), and I thank you for mentioning it. Also, you did Dobby? Awesome. But you made me cry in the "Deathly Hallows" movie. Awfully mean of you. :D

reply

@whitestar1912:

Thank you for the note. I also wondered about the computer savvy of a 400 year-old ghost but I chalked it up to the omniscience of the dead, a great cinematic tradition which accounts for, among other things, the fact that the dead narrator of Desperate Housewives had intimate knowledge not only of the lives of the neighbors she had actually known in life, but also of the lives of those who had moved in long after she died. Best not to question too deeply, I guess :)

Perhaps I was taking too much responsibility as you said, but I had rather err on the side of too much than not enough. I think actors do have a responsibility to balance our need for money and validation of the insane career path we have chosen with the fact that people expect to be entertained when they watch us work. In the madness of a low-budget shoot, it's easy to forget that someone is going to turn on a computer or TV and watch the finished product with tired and unforgiving eyes after a long day at work. I never want to forget that again.

Hairstyle and pants aside, I could have done better and they could have done better with another actor, but I'm glad for the experience and am (I hope) a stronger actor for it.

I hope you do check out Abraham Lincoln Vs. Zombies and here's the trailer for my latest:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CW_FRa5HhNE[url]

very best regards,
Bill

Bill Oberst Jr.
[url]http://www.imdb.com/name/nm2454994

reply

With everything you've said here, you have definitely earned my respect, and I do want to say thank you on behalf of those who enjoy being entertained at the end of the day, be it with high or low budget projects. There are many performers who are not as concerned about their audience and it is refreshing to see this. It shows a great deal of artistic integrity.

Now off to watch Lincoln kick some Zombie butt. :D

ETA: The new trailer has a very strong sense of menace about it. Kudos!

reply

[deleted]