MovieChat Forums > Michael (2012) Discussion > The perfect ending. *spoilers obviously*

The perfect ending. *spoilers obviously*


I was kind of frustrated at the abrupt end to the film but in hindsight it was perfect. We all wanted to see the young boy alive but that would have been a bit too Hollywood for this deeply disturbing film.

Leaving it open in this way was far more in keeping with the tone. Although elsewhere on these boards it's stated that the director has said there was no ambiguity but the abused boy was indeed alive.


Stunning piece of cinema but so hard and heart-breaking to watch at times.


Never been so relieved when the main character of a film dies.

reply

[deleted]

i dont think the kid would have died. he had food and water, could have survived at least a month.

reply

he's alive I reckon, just cause the mum didn't have the immediate reaction of putrefied cadaver smell when she opens the door

reply

I found the end rather disappointing. It was a fascinating film throughout, until Michael dies out of nowhere, then we don't even get to see any kind of conclusion. It was too bad they went that route in the end.

reply

I don't think it's "out of nowhere". The boy finally decides to try to escape and injures him. The car crash is not a "deus ex machina", but a result of the attack: we can see that Michael's face is burnt, so his vision is likely to be affected too, and the accident happened at night.

The only thing I found unrealistic was the "prison" door, which was easily recognisable as such, and right next to the stairs. Why didn't he hide it better? What did he say when the gas/electricity man came to check the meter and asked "what did you lock in there"?

reply

I didn't doubt for a second the boy was alive. You're right though, about the non-Hollywood ending. How disturbing to imagine what would unfold in that mom's heart and head in those next ten seconds had the movie continued...

reply

My problem with the ending is that it seems like a pretty sadistic little joke to play on the audience, to make it wait and wait, knowing the boy is locked up in his cell alone day after day. We can't be sure if his "pantry" had been recently stocked or not--It could have recently run dry and the boy could be going hungry.

From the dialog, we learn that Michael's funeral is on a Tuesday (which would have been at least four days after he died.) After that his mother says she will go to Michael's house to clean it out the next "weekend," tick, tick, tick... They get there sometime that next weekend, do all sorts of stuff before the mother goes to the basement... Then she LEAVES the basement without opening the door to the boy's "cell". The director keeps up with the slow paced scenes of the brother and mother cleaning out the house even after that before she finally goes back down and finally opens the door.

We, as audience members become more and more upset throughout this last 15 minutes of the film at the thought of the boy going hungry, at least I did. It's very Hitchcockian, actually--slyly humorous in a droll, black comedy sort of way But for a movie that seemed to be very serious minded about confronting "evil" itself to end with such a cheap, sadistic little waiting game being pulled on us, and then not giving us proof one way or the other about the boy's fate, was really disappointing to me. I would have given this very troubling, well-made movie an 8 or a 9 on a ten point scale, but after that sophomoric ending, I dropped it to a 7. Just my opinion.

reply

I completely agree with everything u said.

But instead i was gonna give it a 6 and maybe a 7 depending on the ending but when the ending fell incomplete so too did my desire to raise the stars past a 4/10.

Disappointing, and now that u point it out Sadistic as well.

reply


I agree saltsan. I had a feeling there would be no resolution at the end and sure enough, there wasn't. I still think it's a good movie though.

The boy may have gone hungry but he would survive as long as he had water, humans can go a surprisingly long time without food.

reply

Showing reunion with the family would have been too sappy. And it seems like Americans are suckers for sappy endings.

reply

It was a perfect ending. Actually when that car flipped and if the credits had rolled I would have been satisfied. Why? Because my assumption would be everyone would go over to house to gather up stuff or clean and find the boy. I could have that as my imagination.

At any rate, we saw several times that he spent time away from the house. When he was hit by the car (God was only practicing) and when he had his skiing holiday. There was a sink, kitchen, bed, lights, food, and water. We can live without food (and there have been cases of months without it), but without water for only three days. The boy had water. Why anyone would think he was not alive when she opened door I do not know. The director is already letting us know that there will be retribution and catharsis - again, when the car smacks him out of nowhere, when the kid burns his eyes, and when, halleluia, he is killed. Then the director lets us in on his funeral where we are the only ones in on his nasty little secret as every mourns (but would be screaming if they only knew).

And finally we can believe that he is alive when she opens that door and we can use our imagination as to how happy mum will be to get her little boy back. Remember the boy did not know what happened. He was left alone before.

And finally the end credits. Sunny, yesterday, my life was full of pain, but today my life.....no that kid was alive and reunited with his family.

reply

Yes, I was disappointed for the ending too, the first hour was slow and boring and plain to me, the last half was interesting, the last second was quite a failure, it is like a unfinished job, too hasty to end. Leave us imagination? then we don't have to watch any movie, no Harry Potter or such.

Better to end it with any result, good or bad, it is a duty of the filmmaker, at least to some of the audiences, my $0.02.

reply