MovieChat Forums > Spotlight (2015) Discussion > Coming from Hollywood, this is laughable

Coming from Hollywood, this is laughable


The Catholic Church deserved every bit of criticism that it got in the aftermath of the child molestation scandal.

However...

For Hollywood to be playing holier-than-thou is just ridiculous, as they're the child molestation capital of the United States, if not the world. Elijah Wood and Corey Haim have already gone on record discussing the culture of pedophilia that exists in the industry, and now those same guys want to condemn others? Get the hell out of here.

reply

This film didn't condemn anyone, it told a story of an investigative team and what they found. If only holy and innocent groups were allowed to make movies then there would be none at all.

..*.. TxMike ..*..

reply

The point of the film was clearly to portray what the RCC did was bad. Ergo: condemn.

And the RCC deserved it.

You're missing the point: the point is that Hollywood of all places isn't the institution to point fingers. They embrace pedophilia to a far greater extent than the RCC ever did.

reply

LOL! Where are the thousands of victims of "Hollywood pedophilia"?

reply

There doesn't have to be thousands of victims. Hollywood is a very small town. Even if a movie were made about hundreds of cases of paedophilia in Tinseltown it would bring awareness to the public and could help alter the situation.

England is not a big country, but it has an inordinate amount of paedophile scandals within its Church of England hierarchy, BBC and government. Again, a film would bring awareness and put parents and children on their guard.

A film bringing awareness about the 6% of Catholic priests who are paedophiles is just as worthwhile as a film about small towns like Hollywood and small countries like England where paedophiles continue conducting heinous acts. After all, a child is a child and a paedophile is a paedophile no matter where.

reply

"LOL! Where are the thousands of victims of "Hollywood pedophilia"? "

Are you suggesting that because you haven't heard from the victims, it isn't happening?

Here I am, stuck in the middle with you.

reply

Hollywood isn't a person, Eddie. Just face facts, your church, that you love so much, is a horrible excuse for religion. To even try to turn it around on that s%$thole Hollywood is laughable. "Yeah, but what about them? They were worse than us".

Yeah, that's how the catholic church heals things, instead of taking responsibility, try to blame other folks.

reply

ANYBODY who points fingers is a good thing... The more people who point fingers, the less it can happen.

I'm sure the innocent actors know that this is a problem in Hollywood, so if they're innocent, then all the more reason to shine a light on it to show that this can happen within any organisation (including their own, which they are connected to but not a part of).






"Your mother puts license plates in your underwear? How do you sit?!"

reply

How then would you rather this had gone down? Should Hollywood be cleansed first of it's past sins in the same way the Boston Globe did to the church in this film, before being allowed to tell such a tale?

You speak of Hollywood as if it's an single, self-contained entity, no part of which deserves to tell this tale because of the transgressions of some of its parts.

It's akin to you judging and condemning all individual members of the Catholic church for the pedophilia of some of its priests.

Instead you should be applauding that this film was made, had the right people at the top, hired some serious talent to portray, etc. etc. all in Hollywood. Yes, 'those people' made this film and it is not "ridiculous", nor are they trying to be "holier-than-thou". It seems to me they did nothing more than the right thing.

Commenting on your point about Hollywood's similar problems, without asking for citations that show how it is the "child molestation capital of the United States, if not the world", I'll say this:

Pedophilia exists all over the world. There are many places where people with these tendencies get placed in positions of being able to act on these urges. But few to none compare to these despicable acts occurring in a place as reverent as the Catholic Church. I won't expound on the varied power it has (or had), because you've already seen this film.

Be sure to proof your posts to see if you any words out

reply

From what I've read, 6% of Catholic priests are paedophiles. Britain has been having a shocking amount of Protestant paedophile scandals within its Church of England hierarchy. Also, Britain is having an inordinate amount of paedophile scandals within its BBC and its government. It's too bad people in the US have been kept ignorant regarding these British scandals. It gives people in the US an artificial comfort zone.

Hollywood mogul paedophilia has been around for a long time. I've listened to a Howard Stern radio interview with former-child star Billy Gray (of TV's "Father Knows Best") on YouTube. Billy had made films at major studios such as MGM and Warner Bros. when he was a child. He said he was often approached by paedophiles in Hollywood (this would have been during the 1940s and 1950s).

Corey Feldman's story is sad, but not new. It might be safe to say 6% of Protestant clerics, rabbis and Hollywood moguls are paedophiles. Let's face it, Hollywood moguls have had the reputation of being lecherous lowlifes for ages. Those moguls will chew one up and spit them out. I haven't trusted Hollywood moguls since I found out how they got poor Judy Garland addicted to pills.

reply

Not disputing anything you say, I wonder how you feel about it being appropriate for Hollywood to have created this film.

Is it laughable to you? (See the subject line.)

Does your figure of 6% Hollywood moguls somehow render Hollywood as being ineffectual in producing this film?

Be sure to proof your posts to see if you any words out

reply

No, to your first question. To your second question...obviously Hollywood moguls were not ineffectual at producing the film as it's already been produced.

Two questions for you:

Should people in the US be kept in artificial comfort zones?

Should Hollywood moguls produce a film about their own paedophilia?

reply

Should people in the US be kept in artificial comfort zones?

No.

Should Hollywood moguls produce a film about their own paedophilia?

Logical fallacy.

Be sure to proof your posts to see if you any words out

reply

Your response to the second question comes across as being simultaneously defensive and bizarre. How curious.

reply

Not in the least. Your question asks me to supply an answer that is not logical, nor fair to the number of people in Hollywood that would not condone pedophilia.

Be sure to proof your posts to see if you any words out

reply

I wasn't talking about the Hollywood moguls that would not condone paedophilia as being subjects, themselves, of a film. I was talking about Hollywood moguls in general making a film about paedophilia within the Hollywood mogul community. This filmmaking would include moguls that don't condone the paedophilia in Hollywood along with the lecherous two-faced ones that seemingly do.

reply

If you were to reword your question like this:

"Should Hollywood moguls produce a film about paedophilia?"

(not "their own paedophilia")

My answer would be "yes".

Be sure to proof your posts to see if you any words out

reply

My question is worded perfectly. I wouldn't be rewording it as "Should Hollywood moguls produce a film about paedophilia?" because Hollywood moguls already have by making "Spotlight" which isn't a film about paedophilia within the Hollywood mogul community. "Spotlight" is a film about the Catholic's own paedophilia. It doesn't imply that all Catholic priests are paedophiles. Ergo, Hollywood moguls should make a film about their own paedophilia (there seems to be enough of it!) Oh, BTW...glad your answer would be "yes".

reply

Oh, BTW...glad your answer would be "yes".

*sigh*

Be sure to proof your posts to see if you any words out

reply

The fact that you're carrying water for Hollywood is a little weird.

You ARE aware of the culture of pedophilia that exists in the industry, right?

reply

The fact that you're carrying water for Hollywood is a little weird.

Your response is entirely weird. What is it with all if these binary, broad-brush responses to a very simple subject?

I am simply saying that there is nothing laughable about THIS FILM, nor do I believe by releasing this film that 'Hollywood' (<== broad brush) was attempting to be "holier than thou" (<== direct quote from the OP).

Not defending Hollywood as a whole, especially not their pedophilia. This much should be clear to anyone actually all of this thread.

You ARE aware of the culture of pedophilia that exists in the industry, right?

No, REALLY?!??

Please read through the thread again.

Be sure to proof your posts to see if you any words out

reply

If you truly don't think that Hollywood was trying to be holier than thou, then there's nothing I can do for you. If Hollywood had prefaced the film by saying that they have their own very serious pedophilia problem, then you would have a leg to stand on, but they didn't.

Ergo, holier-than-thou.

And yes, I'm aware that I said that in the OP. I don't need you to spell that fact out for me, big guy.

reply

I'm curious, have you actually seen this film?

Be sure to proof your posts to see if you any words out

reply

The fact you keep enabling the worse pedophilia scandal in the HISTORY OF THE WORLD is very disturbing. Hollywood is a horrible place and we all know it. We almost expect it from them, but the f^&king catholic church?

Come on. This is supposed to be the place and the people you go to for sanctuary, not to be molested by holy people and then systematically f%^ked again by the same "holy" institution. Something is not right with you "father". When were you defrocked?

reply

LOL ^this idiot.

reply

How pathetic. You laugh at your own comment. And then start with name calling. But then you say this and it disqualifies anything else you say:

You're missing the point: the point is that Hollywood of all places isn't the institution to point fingers. They embrace pedophilia to a far greater extent than the RCC ever did.



Again I will say Hollywood is a scummy den of drugs and whores (figurative and literal) while the RCC is a place where people go to worship, not to be molested by holy men (and women) and then to be f%$ked again by the authorities in the church as they let these pedophiles keep molesting children. Where are all these victims from Hollywood you keep rattling on about? The church has almost 100,000 victims in the US alone. Not to mention how many have committed suicide. Your argument is like you, sad and pathetic.

reply

The first part of your comment implies that the RCC and Hollywood should be held to different moral standards. That's *beep* Pedophilia is obviously wrong no matter who you are.

As for the rest, about where all the victims are, I've already stated that the cops and the media refuse to pursue the story.

Keep in mind, that it took an awful long time for the scandal on the RCC to break. Why is that? For the same reason that the scandal in Hollywood has broken out (yet): shame on the part of the victims, the belief that no one will believe them, and refusal of outside sources to look into the story.

I'm not pathetic; you're in *beep* denial.

reply

As for the rest, about where all the victims are, I've already stated that the cops and the media refuse to pursue the story.

If that were true, how did YOU hear about this stuff?

Are you an abused child actor or close to one? If not then you got the information about this problem from....yep....the media.

The Roman Catholic Church and Hollywood aren't only held to different standards, they follow different standards. Since the 60's/70's there have been occasional movies made and arrests made which address the pedophilia problem in Hollywood.

In fact, even you have glossed over half the problem. Far more underaged girls are abused in Hollywood than underage boys. You know that. You've always known that but you don't mention it, preferring to dwell on the supposedly more lurid and perverse issue of molesting young boys.

I saw no shortage of coverage of Michael Jackson's Hollywood abusive liberties taken with young boys. Jackson avoided prison but many other Hollywood molestors did not.

Anyone who has looked into it knows that many, if not most of the most famous Hollywood actresses experienced sexual abuse at a young age, from Judy Garland to Rita Hayworth to Marilyn Monroe, etc. etc. Then there was Roman Polanski's victims, for which he still cannot return to the USA for fear of prosecution. And in music, who doesn't know about the 13 year old girlfriends of Jerry Lee Lewis and members of the Rolling Stones and Led Zeppelin and others? I'm not a Hollywood insider. How do I know about this stuff?

In addition to attention from the Hollywood media and law enforcement officials, there have been some movies made which address this issue, long before the current documentary which addresses this issue was made. Boogie Nights and Mulholland Dr. come to mind, but I know there are more movies addressing this issue.

It remains a problem, but "Hollywood" cannot be compared to the Roman Catholic Church in regard to institutionalized cover-up of child molestation. For over 50 years, Hollywood has and continues to put this issue out there, exposing it whenever possible.

It's not like I have any personal sense of loyalty to "Hollywood" or reason to defend it in any way. This is just how things have been for my entire life. Hollywood exposes its own secrets. The Catholic Church, even under Pope Francis, not so much.

reply

I've already stated how I know about Hollywood's culture of pedophilia. Read my posts again if comprehension is that difficult for you.

reply

I've already stated how I know about Hollywood's culture of pedophilia. Read my posts again if comprehension is that difficult for you.

You were very clear.

You got your information about Hollywood pedophilia from the media.

This does not logically jibe with your assertion that the media is in collaboration with Hollywood to keep the issue hidden.

reply

Loud sound of mic dropping as bsharporflat-50959 walks away. :-)

reply

Loud sound of mic dropping as bsharporflat-50959 walks away. :-)

I'm not sure what this means. "Sexual chocolate!" by Randy Watson?

If you are interested in knowing about more victims of sexual abuse in Hollywood, you should consider the movie and TV stars who have disclosed their victimization as the tip of the iceberg.

And the rest of the iceberg? Hollywood isn't only the center of the universe of mainstream movies. It is also the world capital of porn. The porn industry, where failed actors so often end up. Estimates are that porn stars have a rate of child sexual victimization pushing 100%

reply

It means me, and others on this post argued until we were blue in the face with OP, medwards287, and he would not retreat until you shut him down with facts. We all tried and he kept coming regardless of truth, or his version of the truth

A "mic drop" is the rap/comedy parallel to spiking a football. It says, "My performance was so definitive that there's nothing more to say."

reply

It means me, and others on this post argued until we were blue in the face with OP, medwards287, and he would not retreat until you shut him down with facts. We all tried and he kept coming regardless of truth, or his version of the truth

A "mic drop" is the rap/comedy parallel to spiking a football. It says, "My performance was so definitive that there's nothing more to say."

Ah, got it! Thanks. And apologies for me being dense and not following who was responding to whom.

reply

LOL at all of this. You guys actually think you won?

Regarding the fact that I got this from the media: yes, some media sources reported what Elijah Wood and Corey Haim said. That doesn't change the fact that the media IN GENERAL has ignored the story.

There's no inherent contradiction.

The reason that you're so eager to 'celebrate victory' is because you know deep down that I have a point and you don't like considering the fact that your heroes may largely be a bunch of degenerates and people who condone degenerates.

reply

And by the way, here's an update from Twitter that I think you idiots will find interesting:

https://twitter.com/wesearchr/status/776126715055607808

reply

The only point you do make is that you are a bully who calls people names. You have no clear argument and b sharp proved that. You try and try and yet still provided no proof other than your Donald Trump" style of truth. It truth, because "medwards287" says it is truth and that is all that matters to you. Good luck with your meds, you need to stay on them.

Meanwhile, your precious RCC has been guilty of molestation and worse. Either provide proof of your allegations or shut the f%%% up.

reply

mia-beach, the precious Protestant Church of England has been guilty of molestation and worse. If you don't believe it, try googling "Church of England sex scandal" and you'll see in the on-line editions of British newspapers the shocking articles of Protestant priests, bishops, and archbishops who have been imprisoned, lost their jobs, and have resigned over the paedophilic goings on and cover-ups within the Church of England's hierarchy.

Tellingly, even Britain's ex-archbishop, Lord Hope, resigned in 2014 embarrassed over all the paedophile sex scandals happening within Britain (where clerics can marry unlike celibate priests!) Archbishop is the highest rank in the Church of England (like the Pope is in Rome). Lord Hope's resignation made headlines worldwide, but was hushed in the USA by its news media.

Yankee Protestants love a witch hunt. But when it has to do with Mother England they avoid a witch hunt by censoring the stories to keep USA citizens ignorant to bad press. Speaks volumes! Especially since Britain's government, its famous BBC and its Church of England are guilty of a multitude of child sex scandals. Noteworthy is many of the paedophile Catholic priests who offended young boys and whose superiors covered up the crimes have British surnames.

reply

Ugh, DJH, this doesn't surprise me. I wasn't aware of it and it's horrifying to read, but not surprising. And all in the name of the "god". Harry Shearer does a great job of exposing the religious phonies (England included) on his weekly show, Le Show.

They all (religions) seem to be some of the most *beep* up institutions we have claiming to help us.

reply

mia-beach, I'm not surprised you weren't aware of this. These Church of England sex scandals made news worldwide, but got censored in the USA by its own news media. The WASPs in the USA have that special love for Mother England. So, they like giving the USA and the UK an automatic A+ in everything (even if it means major and massive cover-ups and foul play). WASPs in the USA would still be Church of England members if it weren't for a paltry number of the USA's states getting "freedom" from Britain due to that so-called American Revolution.

Two of the most heinous Church of England's paedophile sex scandals that come to mind are those of Priest Robert Waddington and Ex-Bishop Peter Ball. Priest Robert Waddington sexually molested male youths for 5 decades which the Church of England's hierarchy habitually covered up while shuttling him throughout parishes in London, York, Manchester, Carlisle and finally hiding him away in Australia where he naturally continued molesting male youths...

Ex-Bishop Peter Ball is somewhat more shocking because of his background...a long time friend of Britain's Prince Charles and a frequent visitor to Buckingham Palace. This fiend sexually molested male youths for over 3 decades which the Church of England's hierarchy again habitually covered up. Now, he's served 32 months in prison and is a registered sex offender. He's on Wikipedia for goodness sake! One wonders how Yankees are so ignorant to this.

The Boston Globe uncovered Catholic Church sex scandals and cover-ups 4 decades ago. Many responsible for paedophila and cover-ups in the Catholic Church have surnames from the British Isles. I've noticed Latino surnamed clerics are the minorities (I'm using "Latino" in its Old World Roman usage to define Italians, French, Spanish, Portuguese, Romanians, Maltese, Corsicans, et al. Not the recent rival USA usage claiming it's short for a Latin American who specifically comes to live in the USA). Polish Catholic cleric offenders are practically non-existent.

Harry Shearer is the son of Jewish immigrants. One wonders if he'd dare expose the multitude of Church of England sex scandals and the innordinate amount of Catholic priests with British Isle surnames on "Le Show" for pampered WASPs in the USA to cringe at. After all, with WASPs on the USA dollar (for the moment) and normally commander in chief in the White House (this will change with the lively Latin American population growing so rapidly in the USA), would he double-cross WASP Yankees by exposing British church misdeeds to such an extent? It remains to be seen.

reply

LOL at your last sentence.

#Triggered

And Corey Haim's testimony (and also that of Corey Feldman) is proof enough, given that they're eyewitnesses.

And you're crying about being bullied? Grow a set and quit whining.

On top of that, you're deflecting anyway, since I pointed out there was no contradiction in my argument and now you're trying to change the subject to what a naughty boy I am.

You leftists really are pathetic. You worship a disgusting, degenerate industry and squeal like stuck pigs when someone points that out.

reply

Still not one trace of proof, other than the "Corey's". Two coked up 80s hasbeens (one dead) and that is your proof. Yet, you ignore the biggest pedophile scandal in history of the world. The pathetic one stares back at you every morning.

reply

By the way, you look like a cuck. Not surprising. Leftist males are the softest and most pathetic males on earth.

Anyway, between the testimonies of Corey Haim, Corey Feldman, and Elijah Wood (which is proof in itself, idiot), there is more than enough justification for the LAPD to start an investigation, which would undoubtedly turn up even more proof. But you don't even want an investigation, because deep down you know what the LAPD will find.

And by the way, in my OP I specifically stated that the RCC is guilty as hell, so I'm not 'ignoring' anything. Nice try, liar.

reply

If the Roman Catholic Church and Protestant denominations banned British Isles surnamed clerics the paedophilia problems in churches would decline noticeably. 6% of Roman Catholic Church clerics are paedophiles and the vast majority of the offending clerics have British Isles surnames. The rash of Church of England paedophiles regarding Protestant priests, bishops, and archbishops who have been imprisoned, lost their cleric positions and have resigned due to the decades and decades of sex scandals and cover-ups speaks for itself. Ex-Archishop Lord David Hope resigned in 2014 at the top of the church's hierarchy embarrassed over Britain's ill-handling of these fiends.

reply

Ah, the typical closeted poster. Checking me out like the latent homosexual you really are. It all makes sense now. It's 2016, let your true feelings out and stop letting it ruin your failed marriage. Be honest with your wife and stop destroying her life.

reply

So, zero response to what I just wrote, which is the following:

"Anyway, between the testimonies of Corey Haim, Corey Feldman, and Elijah Wood (which is proof in itself, idiot), there is more than enough justification for the LAPD to start an investigation, which would undoubtedly turn up even more proof. But you don't even want an investigation, because deep down you know what the LAPD will find.

And by the way, in my OP I specifically stated that the RCC is guilty as hell, so I'm not 'ignoring' anything. Nice try, liar."

You ignored this^ because you know you can't rebut it.

And your attempt at reframing the discussion by accusing me of homosexuality was weak. Seeing your profile pic (that you uploaded) is not the same thing as 'checking you out.'

Even more interestingly, you didn't deny that you looked like a cuck, nor did you deny that leftist males are the biggest pussies on earth. Again, it's because you know I'm right.

You're a pathetic, embarrassing excuse for a man. Go jack off in the corner while a bull rails on your wife, cuck.

reply

"And by the way, in my OP I specifically stated that the RCC is guilty as hell..."

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------


medwards287, while I'm totally against paedophilia, I wish you'd put things in their proper perspectives. Are there paedophiles clerics in the Roman Catholic Church? Yes, 6% of its clerics are paedophiles. Are they mostly British Isles surnamed? Yes. Are there paedophile clerics in the Protestant Church of England? Yes, an unknown percent. Are they mostly British Isles surnamed? Yes.

As a Latino person, who is an evolutionist, I find it offensive that British Isles surnamed people love to attack the Roman Catholic Church, which is largely Latino, when the majority of the paedophiles in the Roman Catholic Church are not Latino surnamed (Italian, French, Spanish, Portuguese, Romanian, Maltese, Monégasque, Corsican, Croatian, etc.). Nor, are they non-Latino surnamed such as the Polish, Lithuanians, German Catholics, etc. It's the British Isles surnamed clerics that are the majority of the paedophiles.

When a British Isles surnamed cleric sexually offends a male youth 3,000 miles from Rome, as in Boston, and has another British Isles surnamed cleric cover the crime up, you simply can't blame the Vatican for British Isles surnamed clerics heinous behavior in the US. British Isles people love a good witch hunt. Yet, the British Isles surnamed people are the very ones who are the major paedophiles in the Roman Catholic Church.

"Spotlight" about British Isles surnamed paedophile Father John Geoghan.

"Mea Maxima Culpa: Silence in the House of God" about British Isles surnamed paedophile Father Lawrence Murphy.

"Deliver Us from Evil" about British Isles surnamed paedophile Father Oliver O'Grady.

Now, you are of the opinion that the Roman Catholic Church is guilty as hell. Well, it's not. It's the British Isles surnamed ones that are doing most of the offending not the Latino surnamed ones. A few bad apples don't spoil the whole bunch. British Isles sunamed clerics have succeeded in spoiling the Protestant Church of England with the shocking abundance of paedophilia, cover-ups and the shuttling of paedophile clerics within Britain and Australia.

Honestly, British Isles surnamed people are great ones at covering things up. The US presidents have been mostly British Isles surnamed. And, all of the horrific paedophile scandals happening within the Church of England have been censored in US news so WASPs in the US can live in an artificial comfort zone.

The ex-Archbishop of the Church of England, Lord David Hope, resigned in 2014 (while "Spotlight" was filming) embarrassed over the Church of England's paedophiles, cover-ups and shuttling paedophile clerics around. In the Church of England's hierarchy, Archbishop is the equivalent of the Pope. Lord David Hope's resignation made headlines everywhere except in the US. Foolish, you say?



reply

I'm arguing with the cuck right now, Hoffman. Piss off.

reply

You and your cuck mama piss off, headwards287!

reply

I am sending you a huge kiss, sweet eddie. Now stop cruising the Macy's bathroom and head over to the parish. Your priest is waiting for his holiday head job from
you.

reply

Touché, mia-beach! Sweet Heady can't get enough of Macy's and various priests. Those British Isles surnamed priests want Sweet Heady to stop changing the color of his lipstick due to the odd rainbow poles it's been creating.

reply

Exactly Doctor. Never seen such a self-hatred loser as he. Though he sure loves his "Coreys" doesn't he.

reply

^The response of a man who's lost and knows it. LOL.

Enjoy your fantasizing about other men getting it on with your wife, little sub.

reply

And yet another troubled sign of a "pathetic loser". Laughing at your own comment. Poor little Eddie.

reply

mia-beach, Heady sleeps with his lipstick on. (He shoplifts it at Macy's!) He never knows when he'll be getting a midnight call to go into his routine. Sometimes he doesn't even get a call. He just sleepwalks over to local parishes.

reply

You are so right Doctor. That is why he is adamant on his "cuck" calling. He is classic.

reply

The way it should have gone down is the director and actors do an expose on Hollywood and then, after that, go over what the RCC did.

reply

Hollywood is not a centralised institution. There is no Pope of Hollywood. There is not a singular leadership that can collectively speak for the entirety of Hollywood..

In short, this film is the best you're going to get, and you should not be complaining about its existence. Don't deny that you are complaining either, because according your, they didn't do it right.

You should be ashamed for deriding an important and very well done film on this subject.

Be sure to proof your posts to see if you any words out

reply

Any of the other studios could have called out Paramount for the hypocrisy, but they all stayed silent. Therefore, they were complicit in said hypocrisy. Nice try.

reply

<yawn> You've mentioned all of 2 "Hollywood" victims. Who are all the others you allude to? So far, sounds like you're just a troll blathering about something for which you have no evidence.

reply

Actually, those guys talked about a culture of pedophilia in the industry, and because the media and cops don't investigate Hollywood (for obvious reasons), the number of documented victims is pretty low.

I'm not troll, but you are definitely carrying water for Hollywood.

reply

So the fact is that you don't know of any other victims of your so-called pervasive "Hollywood pedophilia" other than the 2 you mentioned.

reply

Oh, there are more. I'm not going to give you an exhaustive list.

And I notice that you didn't address the fact that these guys said this sort of thing is common in Hollywood (which makes them whistleblowers), and neither did you talk about the fact that the cops and the media refuse to investigate this issue fully since it's Hollywood (hence the lack of documented victims compared to those of the RCC).

And you're still carrying water for them. You must really love these guys, eh? HAHA.

reply

With another pathetic answer like this:

Oh, there are more. I'm not going to give you an exhaustive list.


I am officially labeling you a troll. Back under the bridge for you. Enjoy your sad derisory life.

reply

LOL! Well said, Mia. And a none-too-bright troll at that.

reply

Former-child star Billy Gray ("Father Knows Best") outed people in Hollywood being paedophiles during a Howard Stern radio interview I heard on YouTube. Billy worked at major film studios such as MGM and Warner Bros. According to him, paedophilia was rampant when he worked at those studios as a kid in the 1940s and 1950s.

reply

Name-calling won't change the truth of what I said.

First of all, I don't owe you an exhaustive list. You're free to do your own research. Refusing to do your own work for you doesn't make me a troll.

Secondly, you still haven't addressed the fact that the cops and media absolutely refuse to go after Hollywood in a systematic fashion even though more than a few actors have brought up their culture of pedophilia.

You're calling me a troll because you don't want to face the facts about one of your favorite industries.

reply

Eddie, you are such a sad, lonely soul. I hope you get the reprisal you feel you are deserved with your initial trolling post. Life is way too short to waste any more time with you. Good luck with all.

reply

^In other words, you can't rebut what I said and so now you're running away. That's fine.

reply

I am officially labeling you a troll. Back under the bridge for you. Enjoy your sad derisory life.
🐭

reply

LOL, any kind of derision to get your mind off of the logic of what I wrote, right?

I know. It's tough having your biases challenged. But you'll be ok.

reply

This is beyond dumb logic. Not every Catholic priest is a paedophile or condones it, they have the freedom of thought to speak against it. That same logic applies to filmakers. It would of been worse if Hollywood decided not to make it because they have there own sorid past.

reply

You're overgeneralizing though.

reply

Agreed... but not EVERYBODY in Hollywood or even working on the film will have been involved in abuse... so they deserve to be able to speak out without being tainted by a conspiracy of silence that undoubtedly exists.






&#x22;Your mother puts license plates in your underwear? How do you sit?!&#x22;

reply

What proof do you have that the filmmakers of Spotlight have been involved with pedophilia? Or because someone in Hollywood is a pedophile then everyone in the industry is a pedophile? Your post is illogical and a bit moronic.

reply

Or because someone in Hollywood is a pedophile then everyone in the industry is a pedophile?
Similar to not every priest is a pedophile.

reply

You missed the point entirely. My argument is that the people who made Spotlight should be investigating their own industry before going after the RCC.

reply

Please. First of all, do you really equate the role of priests in the lives of the devout with the role of Hollywood executives?

Secondly, where's your proof of widespread, systemic child sexual abuse on their part? And what trusted Hollywood authority figures are engineering the cover-up?

reply

Corey Feldman once said that Hollywood's biggest problem is pedophila.

God, you're ignorant.

All those who hate Katherine Heigl can eat s-t and die!!!

reply

Your "proof" is the word of ONE actor? And a very troubled one at that? LOL!

reply

Corey Feldman
Corey Haim
Elijah Wood
Billy Gray

All of these actors have experienced molestation at the hands of Hollywood, or acknowledge that pedophilia is a problem in Hollwood. Directors like Bryan Singer have been investigated over allegations of pedophilia. There has even been a documentary made about the subject: www.imdb.com/title/tt3677412/?ref_=nv_sr_1. But you act as if that isn't a thing in Hollywood.

That's good. Keep your head stuck up your ass.



All those who hate Katherine Heigl can eat s-t and die!!!

reply

Ribelin2000,

The Billy Gray interview is on YouTube as "Howard Stern Interviews Billy Gray". I've listened to the interview. I must say, I believe Billy Gray. He comes across as a remarkably honest and sincere person. He was open about so many things in that interview. I doubt he would lie about those lecherous Hollywood paedophiles. I've heard in the 1930s, if Hollywood moguls wanted a child to cry on-screen, they used to smack the child hard, enough times, to make the child really cry (for a pittance of a salary!) Regardless of salaries...leave kids alone!!!

I really don't know what to think about Jew these days. As an Evolutionist, I find the fanciful, self-important Jewish claim that God created the first Jewish man, Adam, from dust, and created the first Jewish woman, Eve, from Adam's rib ridiculous. Then, a fallen angel (created by God, and almost as powerful as God) turned himself into a snake and tempted Eve with an apple so God could go ballistic on Adam and Eve. How silly!

Later, people made God go ballistic again so he destroyed the entire human population of this planet except for Jewish Noah and his family who were allowed to hide in an arc. After the flood, Noah and his family, by way of incest, were able to produce the Blacks, the Chinese, the Indians, the Arabs, the Nordics, etc. It's utterely absurd in this enlightebned age of DNA. People are right in embracing evolution and the Cradle of Mankind being Africa.

Jewish people claimed their God would deliver a savior...a Messiah...to save man from God's wrath. (WTF?!) Allegedly, a group of Jews brought a Jewish man, who claimed to be the Messiah, to Rome and insisted he was an imposter. The Jews wanted him crucified like thousands of criminals had been. Upon the cross, they taunted him and threw rocks at him. What they didn't see coming was people, ultimately, accepted him as the savior which is not what the Jews wanted. Seemingly, the Jews didn't like losing the fear factor manipulation of God's wrath they had on people who suddenly accepted Christ as the savior. Jews are still awaiting their Messiah 2,000 years later. Ho-hum!

Inadvertently, the Jewish people are responsible for the Holocaust, themselves. They got people to believe in the creation of Man in the Garden of Eden. Then promised a Messiah. When a Jew claimed to be him, the Jews didn't accept him. This caused a divide between those who accepted him and those who didn't. Hence, the Holocaust. Due to the Jewish people's self-important, mean-spirited scripture, gays who were embraced and considered normal in Ancient Greece, Rome and China (and were allowed same sex marriages) became victims of the Holocaust as well.

As a heterosexual woman, I've never seen anything wrong with same sex partners. Many straight men have told me their first "experiences" were with other boys in their childhood. I guess this happens because girls are taught by their mothers to be demure. (You know, don't let a boy do this 'n that to you.) However, I see nothing wrong with a man having another man as a husband (or a woman having a wife). Since it was acceptable before Judaism/Christianity, it's a good thing this planet has wisened up and reaccpted it.

There is a woman on these message boards who tried to explain away the Jewish scripture's mean-spiritness towards gays as happening because in Jewish culture family is everything and gays don't reproduce. Yeah, right! The heterosexual Ancient Greeks, Romans, and Chinese reproduced superbly without being mean-spirited to gay people. I believe it's time for people to become secular and drop all the fanciful spiritual Jewish BS.

reply

Wow!! What an uneducated, ridiculous load of idiocy!! I won't bother to expand on the MANY things wrong with what you said but here's a little tidbit: The human race wouldn't exist without incest.

reply

medwards287,

Jewish Hollywood moguls have been known to be lecherous paedophile low-lifes from the 1930s right up to the present. It's a case where money talks. Young actors have been sexually molested by paedophile Hollywood moguls ever since the Great Depression and the molesters have been getting away with it because fame and fortune is seemingly a rewarding goal for the abused. Hush money paid without problem.

As I've said before, the Protestants in the Church of England have been getting away with rancid paedophile scandals in the US's news media because of the US's Anglomania for England. Such a dreadful shame. Especially since the Church of England has a top of its hierarchy, archbishop, like Rome has its pope. (And Protestant clerics aren't celibate and are mostly married men.)

In the Church of England, ex-Anglican priest Robert Waddington had sexually abused young males for 5 decades which the Church of England allowed and covered-up. He was shuttled throughout different parishes in London, York, Manchester, Carlisle and was finally hidden away in Australia where he continued his paedophile misdeeds.

Prince Charles's buddy (and frequent visitor to Buckingham Palace) ex-Anglican bishop Peter Ball had sexually molested young males for 3 decades which the Church of England again allowed and covered-up. Peter Ball has now served 32 months in prison and is a registered sex offender.

Ex-Anglican bishop Michael Perham had young male sex offense accusations made against him and quit the clergy even before his cases went to court.

Most telling is ex-Anglican archbishop Lord Hope (the height of the hierarchy) who, two years ago in 2014, resigned over the ill-handling and "systemic failures" of the heinous paedophile goings-on and cover-ups within the Protestant Church.

Noteworthy is that while these shocking scandals made headlines in the UK and were translated into Italian, French, Spanish and Portuguese for the foreign-language news media of Latin Europe and Latin America, not a word was said in the US's news media. Puritains love a good witch hunt and Jew-run Hollywood loves catering to them...as long as it's not about their own Protsetant/Jewish scandals. Disgraceful!

reply

For Hollywood to be playing holier-than-thou is just ridiculous, as they're the child molestation capital of the United States, if not the world. Elijah Wood and Corey Haim have already gone on record discussing the culture of pedophilia that exists in the industry
I wonder when an all star cast movie about the pedophiles in their own industry will be made then receive Oscar nominations?

reply

[deleted]