MovieChat Forums > Crawlspace (2012) Discussion > Don't let the rating fool you.

Don't let the rating fool you.


I just watched this and it's very entertaining for a low budget romp. It's got decent acting...and for once...a good story. There's a big twist you absolutely cannot see coming that makes it all worth it. It's no way a 4.7.

I'd give it a solid 7 but I'm going to give it an 8 because the lead actress was so good in it. Music was solid, FX were decent...not the absolute best...but far better than some other low budget efforts.

http://www.youtube.com/user/alphazoom
http://www.vimeo.com/1986276

reply

there is no way its 4.7, bec its a 0.0

Werd 2 ur mudda, bruddafcker

reply

Go back to the Les Miserables board.... You seem to troll there more than other places.

http://www.youtube.com/user/alphazoom
https://soundcloud.com/#carjet-penhorn

reply

U have crap taste in moovies

Werd 2 ur mudda, bruddafcker

reply

No, this flick was sh !t .


reply

Have to agree. For a low budget, straight to DVD movie this was pretty awesome. Though I kinda picked the twist early. Even though, it was great way to spend some time on a rainy day.

I'm giving a solid 6/10. Not sure why it is rated so low, it is what it is!

reply

Also liked it. Not the best, but entertaining. Also went 6/10

reply

I totally agree. It was entertaining enough, despite the obvious low budget. Definitely worth a watch.

reply

I liked it, but I can't put over 4/10, because it was quite boring for me. I don't actually know, what was wrong with it... cool story, good CGI, actors are also pretty good. It's not a bad movie.

reply

What's wrong with it, basically, is that you've seen it all before. 'Crawlspace' "borrows" some of the more memorable bits and twists from other, mostly better movies and mixes them all together in an attempt to appear original, but it ultimately fails. It isn't really "I wish I had that hour and a half back" bad, but you wouldn't have been missing out if you'd never seen it.

reply

[deleted]

Watch the Film Aliens instead.

reply