MovieChat Forums > Deepwater Horizon (2016) Discussion > Failure to properly audit.

Failure to properly audit.


I found the first half of this movie most interesting as it deals with the characters, their lives, how they traveled back and forth, how they interacted on the job, the depiction of the disagreements on well readiness. Having worked in the oil refining industry I found the type of interactions and banter very realistic.

Most of the second half is the disaster and as such it becomes the somewhat typical disaster movie, showing the explosions, the falling rigs, the injuries, the escapes. All well made but nothing that we haven't seen before except we know this was a real event.

It is an example of what can happen when proper auditing is bypassed.

..*.. TxMike ..*..

reply

It is an example of what can happen when proper auditing is bypassed.

I am not sure how you are using "auditing" in that context but I think you are on exactly the right track.

I would say it's an example of what happens when established procedures aren't followed.

reply

It all comes back to auditing ... an independent systematic examination of records to verify that all procedures are being followed and, when an error occurs, systematic corrective action is taken. When auditing is not part of the culture then it results in people making arbitrary decisions against procedure which in time result in errors. Or disasters in the worst cases.

..*.. TxMike ..*..

reply

It all comes back to auditing ... an independent systematic examination of records to verify that all procedures are being followed and, when an error occurs, systematic corrective action is taken. When auditing is not part of the culture then it results in people making arbitrary decisions against procedure which in time result in errors. Or disasters in the worst cases.

Fair enough.

reply

I'm just afraid it can happen again, ever since a recent executive order practically demands from the EPA to drop any actual and valid concerns in favor national productivity.

I live in the Gordius Apartment Complex, my interior designer was M.C. Escher.

reply

The EPA is not the oversight agency for offshore drilling.

reply

I'm aware of that, but it's the first domino in killing systemic oversight.

I live in the Gordius Apartment Complex, my interior designer was M.C. Escher.

reply

I'm aware of that, but it's the first domino in killing systemic oversight.

Perhaps you're right. But the system was evidently broken before the Macondo disaster, which is one of the reasons the MMS (Minerals Management Service) was effectively dismantled and broken into three agencies afterwards.

I am not wise enough to know if anything happening with the EPA now is going to make things worse than the way MMS was running things or not.

I guess we will need to wait and see, but if another disaster occurs it will be bad.

On a hopeful note I would point out this isn't the worst oil spill in the Gulf and the Gulf did recover from that worse one so it will (or has) recovered from this one. But we absolutely don't need new spills.

And I don't know if it makes anyone feel better but BP's stock is still in the dumper.

reply

There's a small village in my birth country, that's for intents and purposes is an offshore paradise for companies, especially those, who set up shop before the EU ended derogation on establishing new companies. For one fiscal year, shortly before the tragedy, one such company was listed there, which owned Deepwater Horizon, it was a Triton company, a daughter of Transocean. In that fiscal year, they made 462 million dollars from leasing out the rig.

Mike is right, several oversights were made, some even years before the tragedy. Actually the very reason to relocate the intellectual license from my motherland to Switzerland was because the rig was on its way out, and it had it last 3 years lease with a new operator. It doesn't lessen BP's blame, but it should have diverted attention toward American companies being owned offshore to avoid taxation and liability.

The reason I'm less hopeful is because I've seen the effects of discarding environmental protection and landmark protection in favor of expedited construction, and especially in the oil business I remember Palin's pledge to drill for oil everywhere. This disaster halted it for a while, and by while I mean 5 years. Meanwhile in the both Dakotas there are like 8 environmental agents who oversee oil drillings, and let's just say, they're very lenient with the danger factors to human life and the environment. Heck, them being just 8 people is also because of the oil industry, even if they're the most pristine guardians, it's physically impossible to track all, so most accidents are settled out of court.

I live in the Gordius Apartment Complex, my interior designer was M.C. Escher.

reply