MovieChat Forums > Sisters (2015) Discussion > So movie's about 1st-world problems?

So movie's about 1st-world problems?


Hi folks, I saw this movie a little while ago and though I love Amy and Tina I couldn't get over the premise of the movie. Let me start off by saying that the movie's supposedly set in Orlando, Florida, but according to the shooting location the movie was primarily filmed in New York. However, within the reality of the movie and judging by the neighborhood these characters were raised in I'd say my best guess is that they lived in an upper-class community outside of Orlando City. You can tell the setting's implied to be just outside Orlando City, since the beginning aerial shot shows Lake Eola, which is in the heart of what we call "City Beautiful." There are two possible communities they could belong to that'd fit with their proximity to the city: 1) Dr. Phillips or 2) Windermere.

Why I titled my post "First-World Problems" is because the size and décor of the house, the large backyard with impressive tree lines/foliage and varied luxury cars spell out to me that the characters grew up in Windermere. Generally speaking, Windermere, Florida, is basically the focal point of affluence in Orlando. Dr. Phillips is also opulent, but Windermere is known for historical, quaint homes. Needless to say, the characters didn't experience an upbringing where money was a question.

So when I see two rich Caucasian women complaining about their childhood home being sold, I can't help but wonder why we should care about their first-world problems. Their parents are likely multi-millionaires and, based on the dialogue, spared no expense (no pun intended) on keeping their daughters out of trouble. If anything, the characters are hard to relate to or sympathize with BECAUSE they're spoiled rich brats. I think the movie could've been improved by making them middle-class women who return to their family home after their parents died to sell the home, whereupon they decide to celebrate old memories with one last hurrah. But that's just me.

reply

It's ok to have a movie that isn't about the problems of middle class or poor people.

Sometimes people that are well off have problems too, and although their problems may not be financial in nature, they are still real problems to them.

It's very judgmental of you to characterize other people's troubles as "1st-World problems".

People go to the movies to escape from reality. A movie that just reminds of their own trouble-filled life isn't much of an escape.

reply

You should've titled your post "I'm going to bitch now because I can't relate". Not everything is going to be written by people that lived the same life as you. I wasn't raised the same as most characters, but I can relate to their feelings. Maybe you shouldn't be so caught up in money and you would be alot happier.

reply

God you're a douche.

reply

God I really hate when people write back stupid *beep* like "wahh not all movies have to be the same. wahhh not everyone has to be struggling. it can be about other people wahh." Yeah no *beep* sherlock, but also not everyone has to like it. And whoever said movies are for escaping needs to study film a bit more. That may have been the case 30-100 years ago but these days the movies that are taking home awards are biopics, or movies that people can relate to (Living with alzheimers, coming of age stories, tragedies, etc.). SO that argument is out that window completely. Not that it is totally untrue but most people don't go to a comedy to laugh at a flying spaghetti monster wreaking havoc on an alien planet. They are for the most part, relatable, which makes humor such a strong bonding thing.

Omnificent. I actually completely agree with you, and couldn't get over the whole "These women are in their 40's bitching about their parents selling their family home. Meanwhile people can't even afford to buy homes anymore. Meanwhile one of them can't even provide a home for her kid." It must be nice. If not being able to relate to that makes me sound stupid then I guess I am stupid. There are a million other reasons they could have been brought back to the house for a party, that would make you hate the characters less. I think it really got in the way of finding the humor funny because you just wanted to slap both of them and tell them to wake the *beep* up. It seemed like a rush job and a quick way to get to the bulk of the movie without really hashing out an entire story.

SO YES everyone replying, you're right, NOT ALL MOVIES HAVE TO BE ABOUT POOR PEOPLE, which is not even what the OP was trying to say but okay? but YES OP, I agree it made the story line seem LAZY and not well thought out.

reply

I really couldn't give less of a *beep* about what part of Florida Irs supposed to be.

reply

I hate post like the OP's here. He takes a disinterest in the film's premise and tries to cover it with political window dressing. What nonsense. It is a fact that "first world" people have their own problems. Are then going to try and rank them downward for some political reason?

I mean really, what nonsense.

reply

"First World Problems."
No matter where you are or what socio-economic status you're in, these kinds of aggravations will arise. People don't just focus on bigger issues all the time.

reply

Lol

reply

You sound like a fun person to be around.

reply