Confusing interviews

Two girls and three boys in the 're-enactments'; two girls and two boys in the interviews. That was too much for me to get my head around, and I'm still not sure if the two actors per character were split between actor and interviewee or between actor/interviewee and viral-clip "real person". Were the grainy people in the 'viral clip' the same as the people in the interviews (which they should have been)?

If the interviewees were different people from the re-enactment actors, which they should have been (I just didn't notice), they should have been much more distinguishable from their respective counterparts. I would have been more likely to swallow the ruse instead of just being confused. Plus it would have been a more realistic mock-up of a real docudrama, where the real individuals behind an adventure are usually less attractive, less photogenic than the people acting out their story.

Plus the women weren't believable 'interviewees'.

Anyone else irritated by the interviews (..besides all the other defects)?