So she shoots one of the intruders and then tells the other (while pointing a gun at him) 'get out of my house'. why in the blanket blank didn't she shoot him. She lets him go so he could possibly come back or rob another house? Stupid stupid stupid
Depending upon which state she lived in, if she had shot the second guy the authorities would have been all over her for it as he was not threatening her (these are usually Northeastern or Pacific coast states). In other states, he'd be dog meat.
Hold him for the cops. Chasing him off leads to the scenario followed by the vengeful girlfriend - the Bad Guys know where YOU live, you don't know where they are.
Some people find it very difficult emotionally to have to shoot someone. Maybe she just could not stand shooting another person. And the detective did tell her that he has never heard of an accomplice coming back.
"Do All Things For God's Glory"-1 Corinthians 10:31 I try doing this with my posts