the only review


the only review is clearly been written by the people involved in the making of the film. so pinch of salt people.

but saying that this is the sort of film i normally enjoy so i will be most likely be buying this when it comes out. it was made for 13.000 thats nothing i would very much like to see whats they have done.



















kirk out

reply

I wrote a review of "After the Dawn," submitted it, and was surprised it did not subsequently appear. So I revised the review, re-submitted it, and still it did not appear. Don't know why. Here's the gist of my review: "After the Dawn" is one of those post-apocalypse movies in which our heroine wanders across the bleak landscape of an America decimated by some sort of killer plague. She's searching for her brother. Along the way she picks up a young mute boy. Since there's not much impetus for conversation, we're given a lot of voice-over narration delivered by our heroine in a droning voice that's probably meant to be haunting or hypnotic but instead seems dull, dreary, and a tad pretentious. (For some reason the script mentions that our heroine was born in Liverpool which prompts a vague stab at a British accent.) There's not much action or excitement during this quest and the ending seems to try for a Twilight Zone kind of surrealism which proves muddled and unsatisfactory. The people who made this movie probably enjoyed the experience and should be commended for at least making the effort but their movie is, I fear, not worth watching.

reply

I have to concur a-east. I'm not exactly sure what I just watched, but it was missing a lot. The ending was one of the most disappointing in recent memory.

reply

Not really sure what I just watched. The Third act completely falls apart, a victim of trying to attempt to do too much to tell the story.
The result is a confusing, poorly administered finale.

reply