If ratings determined a shows quality Big Bang Theory and NCIS would be the best shows on television.
Quality is a completely subjective measurement that has no bearing whatsoever on whether or not a show is canceled. Television is a business. Everything about these shows involves the making of money. There is no such thing as a show that is made to be good.
There are some, of course, where the showrunners and creators have other things on their minds than just cold, hard cash and want to make a good (according to their criteria) show, tell a good story, but when they pitch it to a studio or network exec, it's *all* about how that new show could make the studio or network money.
And there are people who enjoy Big Bang Theory and NCIS. I don't like Big Bang Theory and I no longer watch NCIS, but I don't see any reason to insult those who do.
As for Grimm, it did reasonably well in the ratings on Fridays, enough to last six seasons, which makes it a success in TV Land. Unfortunately, it didn't hit very big in syndication the way Supernatural and Bones did, and its ratings declined.
One can speculate why (too much Juliette, blatantly repetitive storylines, turning Adalind good in a Heel-Face Turn without proper build-up, constantly resetting Nick's powers, inconsistent development of the cool mytharc stuff), but it's ultimately a numbers game. After season six, they would have to renew cast contracts or let people go. The ratings didn't quite justify that process, so they did a final half-season and sayonara. It happens to most shows that make it this far.
Innsmouth Free Press
http://www.innsmouthfreepress.com
reply
share