He was filming this is england 88 In gleadles valley he Is a real nice guy
funny and respectful to his fans posing for pics and chatty
Pretty cool!
"No worries! Same difference! It's all good!" ~Pee-Wee Herman 2011
[deleted]
I was wondering the same thing. I guess we'll just give the original poster the benefit of the doubt that perhaps he forgot to take his meds that morning.
shareI think he did take his "meds".
Andrew Shims, Milky from This is England!
You say this as if we all should know who that is and that we all know what "This is England" is. IMDB is accessed worldwide. Shims isn't a name that people in the states know. You make it sound like he's a Tom Cruise or something!
share"IMDB is accessed worldwide"
And it is also the biggest database of film casts and actors. Would have taken you less than 5 seconds to click on the Airborne link at the top of the page and see who 'Andrew' was and who he played.
'You are receiving this broadcast as a dream.'
Guess what Sherlock? His name WASN'T listed when I first posted. Someone recently added it after the post. I wouldn't of posted that if it would've been listed, hence the whole Who is Andrew conversation, duh. I'd like to note, Andrew may be a good guy, but his fans are rather callow. The jokes on you, MarwoodWalks!
shareGuess What Columbo, YOU ARE LYING!!!!
I checked this film a while ago, he was listed then.
I am not a fan of his, i just pointed out your lazy stupidity.
You are a joke...and a liar.
'You are receiving this broadcast as a dream.'
So you're willing to testify that you checked before August 2nd that his name was definitely on the cast list?
--
"If I don't understand it, it's a plot-hole!"
-Typical Reviewer
You mean sept 3rd, which is when Cool wes first posted. Thats when he claims the name wasnt there. Yes, i can Testify to the great and revered court of IMDB that the name was there on September the 3rd.
Whats it got to do with you anyway?
'You are receiving this broadcast as a dream.'
Listen up keyboard warrior, my post would've never been done if the name was listed. Your argument is null & void because you didn't even enter the conversation until after the mentioned date. You have no proof, that's why it makes you look like the puerile chump. I'm sorry but when I come onto the internet, it's to look around - not to find priggish dolts like you to lie to. Trust me, I have FAR better things to do. If you're not even a fan then why do you even care? Lol! Since you think your such a IMDB detective, you should of seen that there was an additional user besides myself that picked up on the same idea, Who is Andrew? Why would 2 people post the same thing if it wasn't true? Don't bother answering, these are rhetorical questions to show how obtuse you are. Since I am in no way convinced that there is an organ between your ears, I am done wasting my time with you. You now have a shameful spot in my ignored users list, congrats!
shareJust a friendly tip: You used "would've" correctly as it means would + have. However, your use of "should of" is incorrect. Like would've, it is a combination of two words: should + have. Therefore, the correct use is "should've".
Hope that helps for the future!
If I want to hear the pitter patter of little feet, I'll put shoes on the dog.