Even with 13 shills for the producer giving it a 10, and three shills giving it a nine, this film STILL has the lowest score I believe I've ever seen here. Gawd, it must be awful. DVRing it later. Will share my two-cents.
shareMy two-cents: beautiful people; great fashion; glitzy sets (esp the architect's apt); relentless, brainless, loud soundtrack; earnest but mediocre acting; mostly poor writing, with flashes of originality. In sum, typical Lifetime chick flick. Better than 3.4.
(I wonder if some people involved in the production of this film turned against the producers and retaliated with those really low scores. Just saying.)
The score is given by people on here. It's at the top of the page. Anyone can vote. I voted and gave it a 10 which brought it up to 3.5. It deserves a higher rating.
shareI haven't posted here in ages but had to log in to defend this movie when I saw the low score. I'm an hour 20 minutes out of the 2 into it and haven't changed the Chanel once whereas I usually get bored quickly with movies and Chanel surf. I would give it a solid 8 stars out of 10. It's better than most movies I've watched in theaters lately.
shareDecent film with a great surprise ending, I gave it a 7. I definitely think that this film has been underrated here, or perhaps sabotaged by trolls.
shareI give it a 6. It was really good until the end, which was kinda bad, but the movie definitely held my attention.
share