Basically a rip off...


...of "Whose Line is it Anyway?", but I find it very funny.
Regards,
James

reply

Yeah I hate how they copied the use of improvised comedy. Oh wait no, I'm not pedantic.


I eat Lions

reply

In fairness it is by the same producers as 'Whose Line is it Anyway'.

I like the improvisation sketches but some of the one liner rounds need a lot of work.

reply

Hugh Dennis does say at the start of the show that it takes the ideas of other shows and brings them all together..
I think its an awesome show. especially the interpretative dance from David Armand

You might be a king or a little street sweeper, but sooner or later you dance with the reaper

reply

Its a rip off but it can be surprisingly funny at times.








Elvira mistress of the dark is the coolest woman ever.
DCI Gene Hunt (UK) coolest man ever.

reply

Yeah, well we don't have Whose Line Is It Anyway? anymore. Isn't that a bit like claiming Diagnosis Murder is a rip-off of Sherlock Holmes because they're both detective series?

Whose Line and F&L are of the same genre. Nothing more. Sure, Dan Patterson might've wanted to return to improv after the revived interest in WLiiA? a few years ago (which I still think is a missed opportunity) but F&L seems to be a very different show in subtle ways. Even if it's just something as simple as the players' one-liners between games and the fact that there's six of them. All the activities are games rather than scenes too (even the ones that seem to be scene-based tend to be about fun more than improv, such as "Right Way, Wrong Way" and the lying-down game that I can't remember the name of right now). So if there's any similarity to Whose Line, it's only in the same way that all improvisational comedy bears a resemblance to Whose Line, in that it's the most famous improv show and therefore the yardstick.

---
"Kick her in the balls!"

reply